Summary
denying motion for conditional certification based on lack of common policy and the individual issues predominating in an off-the-clock case
Summary of this case from Vondriska v. Premier Mortgage Funding, Inc.Opinion
Civil No. 05-2525 (DWF/RLE).
July 10, 2006
Donald H. Nichols, Esq., Jill M. Novak, Esq., Michele R. Risher, Esq., Paul J. Lukas, Esq., Rachhana T. Srey, Esq., and Sarah M. Fleegel, Esq., Nichols Kaster Anderson, counsel for Plaintiffs.
David P. Pearson, Esq., Laura A. Pfeiffer, Esq., and William A. McNab, Esq., counsel for Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson, and after an independent review of the files, records and proceedings in the above-titled matter, IT IS ORDERED:
1. That the Plaintiffs' Motion for Conditional Certification, Judicial Notice, and to Compel (Doc. No. 29) is DENIED.
2. That the Defendants' informal Motion to Stay Consideration of the Plaintiffs' Motion for Conditional Certification, Judicial Notice, and to Compel (Doc. No. 34) is DENIED, as moot.
3. That the Defendants' Motion to Strike Interrogatory Answers (Doc. No. 57) is DENIED, as moot.