From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

A.W. v. Bd. of Educ. Wallkill Cent. Sch. Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 26, 2015
1:14-CV-1583 (DNH/RFT) (N.D.N.Y. May. 26, 2015)

Opinion

1:14-CV-1583 (DNH/RFT)

05-26-2015

A. W. and N.W., individually and on behalf of B. W., a student with a disability, Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION WALLKILL CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant.

APPEARANCES: OFFICE OF BENJAMIN J. HINERFELD Attorney for Plaintiffs 2 Penn Center, Suite 1020 1500 JFK Boulevard Philadelphia, PA 19102 GINA DECRESCENZO P.C. Attorney for Plaintiffs 180 South Broadway, Suite 302 White Plains, NY 10605 THOMAS, DROHAN, WAXMAN, PETIGROW & MAYLE, LLP Attorneys for Defendant 2517 Route 52 Hopewell Junction, NY 12533 OF COUNSEL: BENJAMIN J. HINERFELD, ESQ GINA M. DECRESCENZO, ESQ. NEELANJAN CHOUDHURY, ESQ.


APPEARANCES: OFFICE OF BENJAMIN J. HINERFELD
Attorney for Plaintiffs
2 Penn Center, Suite 1020
1500 JFK Boulevard
Philadelphia, PA 19102
GINA DECRESCENZO P.C.
Attorney for Plaintiffs
180 South Broadway, Suite 302
White Plains, NY 10605
THOMAS, DROHAN, WAXMAN, PETIGROW

& MAYLE, LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
2517 Route 52
Hopewell Junction, NY 12533
OF COUNSEL: BENJAMIN J. HINERFELD, ESQ GINA M. DECRESCENZO, ESQ. NEELANJAN CHOUDHURY, ESQ. DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER

Plaintiffs bring this action, pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education

Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1415(i)(2)(A), as well as other federal and statutory provisions, seeking a review of the final administrative decision rendered by the New York State Review Officer on September 19, 2014. On April 21, 2015, the Honorable Randolph F. Treece, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that plaintiffs' stay put motion be denied. No objections to the Report-Recommendation were filed.

Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Therefore, it is

ORDERED that

Plaintiffs' stay put motion is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/_________

United States District Judge
Dated: May 26, 2015

Utica, New York.


Summaries of

A.W. v. Bd. of Educ. Wallkill Cent. Sch. Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 26, 2015
1:14-CV-1583 (DNH/RFT) (N.D.N.Y. May. 26, 2015)
Case details for

A.W. v. Bd. of Educ. Wallkill Cent. Sch. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:A. W. and N.W., individually and on behalf of B. W., a student with a…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: May 26, 2015

Citations

1:14-CV-1583 (DNH/RFT) (N.D.N.Y. May. 26, 2015)

Citing Cases

Avaras v. Clarkstown Cent. Sch. Dist.

(See Plf. Reply at 12.) The District Defendants argue, relying on A.W. v. Bd. of Educ. Wallkill Cent. Sch.…