From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wesolowski v. Richard Donahue

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 29, 2007
45 A.D.3d 1224 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 502174.

November 29, 2007.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Southport Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Robert Wesolowski, Comstock, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Patrick Bennett-Mulligan of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur.


Following a tier II disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of providing unauthorized legal assistance. The determination was affirmed on administrative appeal and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, corroborating hearing testimony from the correction officer who authored it and the handwriting sample constitute substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Santana v Selsky, 23 AD3d 722, 723). Petitioner's denial of the charge created a credibility issue for resolution by the Hearing Officer ( see Matter of Callender v Selsky, 41 AD3d 1065, 1066).

Petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claims that he was not afforded an impartial hearing and the misbehavior report was fatally deficient and issued as a means of retaliation, have been examined and found to be unavailing.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Wesolowski v. Richard Donahue

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 29, 2007
45 A.D.3d 1224 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Wesolowski v. Richard Donahue

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROBERT WESOLOWSKI, Petitioner, v. RICHARD DONAHUE, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 29, 2007

Citations

45 A.D.3d 1224 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 9472
845 N.Y.S.2d 764

Citing Cases

Williams v. Selsky

We confirm. To the extent that the petition can be construed as raising a substantial evidence question, we…