Opinion
March 4, 1985
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Young, J.).
Judgments affirmed, with one bill of costs to respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
Plaintiff claims that the trial court erred in excluding from evidence certain articles of clothing and gear worn by him on the day of the alleged incident. The admission or exclusion of real or demonstrative evidence rests largely within the discretion of the trial court ( Riddle v. Memorial Hosp., 43 A.D.2d 750). Upon review of the record, we find no abuse of discretion.
Plaintiff's further claims of error in the jury charge are without merit. Lazer, J.P., Mangano, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.