From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wescott v. Stephens

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 27, 2019
Case No. 18-cv-07407-HSG (N.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 18-cv-07407-HSG

03-27-2019

CARL ALEXANDER WESCOTT, Plaintiff, v. MONETTE STEPHENS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING DISMISSAL WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND

Docket No. 9

The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Ryu's Report and Recommendation Re Dismissal without Leave to Amend. The time for objections has passed and none were filed. The Court finds the Report correct, well-reasoned and thorough, and adopts it in every respect. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed without leave to amend. The Clerk is directed to close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 27, 2019

/s/_________

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Wescott v. Stephens

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 27, 2019
Case No. 18-cv-07407-HSG (N.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2019)
Case details for

Wescott v. Stephens

Case Details

Full title:CARL ALEXANDER WESCOTT, Plaintiff, v. MONETTE STEPHENS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 27, 2019

Citations

Case No. 18-cv-07407-HSG (N.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2019)

Citing Cases

Kepperling v. Kepperling

Doc. 1 at PageID 8. Thus, the only facts pleaded against Magistrate McNamee "relate to [his] actions as [a]…