From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wesch v. Hunt

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, S.D
May 18, 1992
785 F. Supp. 1491 (S.D. Ala. 1992)

Summary

In Wesch the plaintiffs attacked the then existing congressional districting scheme on the grounds that it violated the United States Constitution and section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.

Summary of this case from Wesch v. Folsom

Opinion

Civ. A. No. 91-0787.

March 9, 1992. Judgment Affirmed May 18, 1992. See 112 S.Ct. 1926.

David A. Boyett, III and Ferrell S. Anders, Mobile, Ala., for plaintiff.

Ronnie L. Williams, Mobile, Ala. and John H. England, Jr., Tuscaloosa, Ala., for intervenors-plaintiffs.

Algert S. Agricola, Jr., Mark Montiel, Montgomery, Ala., Michael A. Carvin, Washington, D.C., Ronald C. Forehand, Asst. Atty. Gen., Robert M. Givhan, Walter S. Turner, Office of Atty. Gen., Montgomery, Ala., James C. Wood, Mobile, Ala., Taylor D. Wilkins, Jr., Bay Minette, Ala., Jack Booker Weaver, Windell C. Owens, Monroeville, Ala., George W. Fendley, III, Camden, Ala., Bruce N. Wilson, Grove Hill, Ala. and Michael Onderdonk, Chatom, Ala., for defendants.

Devon Wiggins, pro se.

Gregory B. Stein, Henry Brewster, Mobile, Ala.

Jack Drake, Tuscaloosa, Ala.

Before COX, Circuit Judge, HAND, Senior District Judge, and ALBRITTON, District Judge.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


BY THE COURT.

INTRODUCTION

On September 23, 1991, Plaintiff Paul Charles Wesch brought this action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against the Governor of Alabama, as well as other state officials, contending, inter alia, that the present State law defining congressional districts in the State of Alabama violates Art. I, § 2 of the Constitution. Based on 1990 census data, Wesch specifically alleges that if the 1992 congressional elections were to be held under the present districting plan, it would violate his right to the constitutionally mandated "one-person, one-vote" scheme of representation.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2284(a), this three-judge court was convened. On December 9, 1991, Michael Figures and others, who assert a claim under the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1973 et seq., were granted leave to intervene. A two day trial was held.

Having considered the evidence and the post-trial submissions of the parties, the court enters the following findings of fact and conclusions of law.

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. The Plaintiff Paul Charles Wesch is a citizen of the United States and is a resident and registered voter in the First Congressional District of Alabama as presently configured.

2. The Intervenor-Plaintiffs, Michael Figures and others, are African-American citizens of the United States and the State of Alabama. They have been allowed to intervene in this litigation both on their own behalf and on behalf of all African-American citizens of the State of Alabama.

3. It was agreed by all parties, including the Plaintiff-Intervenors, that the complaint of intervention would proceed on an allegation that § 2 of the Voting Rights Act has been violated, insofar as the class represented by the intervenors had been denied meaningful access to the voting process that would allow them to elect candidates of their choice.

4. The court notes that the original complaint was filed in September, a fact known to the Plaintiff-Intervenors who chose not to intervene until December 4, 1991. Therefore, the Plaintiff-Intervenors were permitted to intervene only after they agreed to comply with all procedures and deadlines in place.

5. The Defendant Guy Hunt is the Governor of Alabama. The Defendant Billy Joe Camp is the Secretary of State of Alabama. The Defendants Lionel W. Noonan, Harry D'Olive, Devon Wiggins, Otha Lee Biggs, Jerry Bogan, Clarence Watters, and Tom W. Turner are the Probate Judges of the seven counties which presently comprise the First Congressional District of Alabama. All Defendants are sued both in their individual and official capacities. All Defendants have significant duties in the administration of congressional elections in Alabama.

6. This court advised the parties of its intent to employ Professor Harold W. Stanley as the court's expert to assist in considering any and all plans for redistricting that might be submitted, and to advise the court on the statistical issues in regard to any possible redistricting. The court extended to the parties the opportunity to state if there were any objections to the court's selection of this expert. No objections were filed. After the trial, the parties were also given the opportunity to object to the statistical information relied on by Professor Stanley, the same information underlying this order. No objections were filed.

7. In 1981, the Alabama Legislature enacted the current version of Ala. Code § 17-20-1 (1987), which divided the state into seven congressional districts. During 1990, the Bureau of the Census of the United States Department of Commerce conducted a census of the United States, including the State of Alabama, pursuant to constitutional authority. On January 16, 1991, the Clerk of the United States House of Representatives notified Governor Hunt that Alabama would retain seven seats in the House of Representatives following the 1990 census. (Statement of Agreed Facts and Exhibit A thereto.)

8. According to the 1990 census, Alabama's total population is 4,040,587 persons. In order to achieve exact population equality among each of Alabama's seven congressional districts, the ideal population of each district would be 577,227 persons. (Statement of Agreed Facts and Exhibit B thereto.)

9. Alabama's most populous congressional district is District 5, which has 603,726 persons. Accordingly, District 5 varies from the "ideal" population by 26,499 persons, or 4.59%. Alabama's least populous congressional district is District 6, which has 532,748 persons. Accordingly, District 6 varies from the "ideal" population by 44,479 persons, or 7.71%. The difference between the populations of the most populous and least populous districts is 70,978 persons, which constitutes a relative overall variance from the ideal population of 12.3%. (Statement of Agreed Facts, Exhibit B.)

10. African-Americans do not constitute a majority in any of Alabama's existing congressional districts. (Statement of Agreed Facts, Exhibit C.) However, according to the 1990 census data, the African-American population in Alabama is sufficiently compact and contiguous to permit the creation of a congressional district in which 65% or more of the residents are African-Americans. The parties agree that such a district should be created. (Supplemental Stipulation filed January 3, 1992.)

11. On February 8, 1991, the Alabama Legislature received the 1990 census data on magnetic tape from the Bureau of Census, and this information was loaded, as received, into the computer system maintained by the Alabama Legislature's Permanent Joint Legislative Committee on Reapportionment ("Reapportionment Committee"). The population data in the Reapportionment Committee's computer data base is the official 1990 census data compiled and released by the Bureau of the Census and is accurate and reliable information for redistricting purposes. (Statement of Agreed Facts.) On July 15, 1991, the Secretary of Commerce advised that there would be no adjustment to the 1990 census figures as originally transmitted to the Alabama Legislature.

12. The total population of each existing congressional district is reflected in Appendix A to this opinion. The total population of each existing congressional district by race is reflected in Appendix B; the total population by race of each of Alabama's 67 counties is reflected in Appendix C; and the voting age population by race of each of the 67 counties is reflected in Appendix D. The names, dates when first elected, and home addresses of Alabama's incumbent congressmen are reflected in Appendix E.

13. On April 2, 1991, the Reapportionment Committee adopted a set of guidelines for redistricting. (Plaintiff's Exhibit 1; deposition of Marilyn Terry, pp. 24-25.) The Guidelines set forth a fair set of criteria for congressional redistricting. In addition to mandating compliance with population equality or the "one-person, one-vote" rule and the requirements of the Voting Rights Act, these guidelines included the following criteria:

3. All legislative and congressional districts will be composed of contiguous and reasonably compact geography.
4. Where possible, legislative and congressional districts should attempt to preserve communities of interest, including without limitation municipalities and concentrations of blacks and other ethnic minorities, where such efforts do not violate the other stated criteria.
5. Counties should be used as district building blocks where possible, and to the extent consistent with other aspects of these criteria.
a. Where county lines cannot be maintained, district boundaries should follow as closely as practicable the local voting precinct boundary lines in order to minimize voter confusion and cost of election administration.
b. Where voting precinct boundary lines cannot be followed and also meet the geographic guidelines as stated in this section, district lines must follow census block geography in order to maintain the integrity of the statistical analysis.
6. Efforts will be made to preserve cores of existing districts where such efforts are consistent with and do not violate the other criteria stated herein.

14. The Alabama Legislature adjourned its 1991 regular session on July 29, 1991, without enacting a congressional redistricting plan. (Statement of Agreed Facts, Paragraph 13.) It was argued that the Legislature might delay the primaries for congressional elections, allowing it time to adopt and have precleared a constitutional redistricting plan. If that were done, two primaries would have to be held, entailing added cost to the taxpayers.

15. By statute, Alabama's congressional primaries will be held June 2, 1992. The qualifying deadline for candidates is sixty days prior to the primary, or April 3, 1992. In order for a legislatively-enacted congressional redistricting plan to receive the "pre-clearance" from the Justice Department required by § 5 of the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1973c, in time for the April 3 qualifying deadline, such a plan should have been submitted to the Justice Department no later than February 3, 1992.

Ala. Code §§ 17-16-6 to -11 (Supp. 1990).

16. Under Alabama law, the calling of special sessions of the Legislature is a discretionary call on the part of the Governor. Ala. Const. Art. V, § 122. The Governor's answer filed on October 29, 1991, indicated that the Governor did not plan to call a special session of the Legislature for the purposes of redistricting.

17. At the time this case was filed, this court considered it highly unlikely that the legislative process could produce a congressional redistricting plan and have it precleared in time for the 1992 congressional primaries to be held as scheduled. Nothing was presented to this court to indicate that the Legislature would convene for the purpose of adopting a plan of redistricting in time to be precleared for these elections. Nothing was presented to indicate that even if a special session was called for the purpose of considering redistricting, that a successful effort would follow, or that even if the Legislature was allowed to consider the matter after the regular term commenced on February 4, 1992, that a plan would be forthcoming, and if forthcoming, there would be time to have such plan precleared. The court considered this case on a fast track in light of the impending primary. All parties participating in this case were put on notice of this fact.

18. Consequently, the court finds that the only means by which Alabama's 1992 congressional primaries may be held in a timely manner (other than under the current districting scheme which, for reasons enumerated in the Conclusions of Law, the court rejects) is pursuant to an interim redistricting plan ordered by this court.

19. The parties have submitted six proposed redistricting plans to the court for its consideration: (1) the "Reed Plan," Plaintiff's Exhibits 3 and 7; (2) the "Sam Pierce Zero Plan," Plaintiff's Exhibits 2 and 6 (hereafter the "Pierce Plan"); (3) the "Hilliard Plan," Intervenors' Exhibits 3 and 3A; (4) the "Unity Plan," Intervenors' Exhibits 1 and 1A; (5) the "Modified Unity Plan," Intervenors' Exhibits 2 and 2A; and (6) the "CD25 Plan," Intervenors' Exhibits 4 and 4A.

20. Of the six plans submitted, only the Reed Plan was considered in its final form by the Reapportionment Committee. The Pierce Plan, however, is a modification of a plan called the "Larry Dixon Plan" which was considered by the Reapportionment Committee. The Pierce Plan modified the Larry Dixon Plan to some extent, but the basic format is similar. The Legislature of the State of Alabama created an Interim Task Force on Reapportionment by Act # 87-356. By Act $ 90-388 that task force became the staff to the Permanent Committee on Reapportionment of the Alabama Legislature. The task force scheduled a series of public hearings in regard to redistricting matters, and under the instructions given to the Reapportionment Committee, as set forth in the Guidelines for Legislative and Congressional Redistricting, the Reapportionment Committee meetings and public hearings were open to the public and all plans presented to the Reapportionment Committee were to be made available to the public for its input. These public meetings were held in accordance with the schedule outlined in the appendix to the motion to dissolve filed by Evans (Tab $ 14). Among those plans considered by the Reapportionment Committee, and one that apparently was to be presented to the Legislature, was the Larry Dixon Plan.

The Reapportionment Committee conducting the hearings was made up both African-Americans and Whites. Public input to the Reapportionment Committee in regard to the respective plans was from both African-Americans and Whites.

21. Neither The Pierce Plan nor the Larry Dixon Plan was adopted by the Alabama Legislature.

22. We take judicial notice of the fact that the Legislature has since adopted a plan which substantially differs from any plan that was submitted to this court. We also note the fact that the adopted Plan has neither been precleared by the Justice Department nor approved by the District Court for the District of Columbia.

23. Only two of the plans submitted — the Pierce Plan and the Reed Plan — achieve population equality among the districts. Under the Pierce Plan two districts contain one person less than the ideal district population of 577,227. Under the Reed Plan, one district has two fewer voters than the ideal. The Hilliard Plan has a total deviation of .71% and an average deviation of .63%. The Modified Unity Plan shows a deviation of 1.6% with an average of .52%. The Unity Plan exhibits a total deviation of 1.15% and an average of .27%. Finally, the CD25 Plan has a deviation of .02%. Deviations in all these plans are not justified by any particular goal or interest.

24. Both the Pierce and Reed Plans contain a district with more than 65% African-American population. Under the Pierce Plan, District 7 contains an African-American population comprising 67.69% of the total residents of that District and 63.58% of that District's voting age residents. These percentages slightly exceed those in the majority African-American district (District 4) created by the Reed Plan: 66.69% total population and 62.93% voting age population. (Plaintiff's Exhibits 2 and 3; TR 15-16.) More significantly, as of December 1990, the African-American percentage of registered voters in the Pierce Plan's District 7 was 55.55%, which is 3% greater than the African-American percentage of registered voters in the Reed Plan's District 4.

25. Both the Reed Plan and the Pierce Plan provide African-Americans in Alabama with a substantial majority so as to permit them an opportunity to elect a candidate of their choice. The district in the Pierce Plan is slightly more weighted because it includes higher percentages of African-Americans in total population, voting age population and registered voter population.

26. The Hilliard Plan includes two majority African-American districts, with an African-American population of 59.33% and 61.98% respectively. Although this plan was submitted by the intervenors, they took the position that the Hilliard Plan probably provided obstacles of sufficient nature to cast doubt on their opportunity to elect candidates of their choice in these districts.

27. There are significant differences between the Pierce Plan and the Reed Plan in terms of compactness of their districts. District 1 of the Pierce Plan includes six closely contiguous counties in southwest Alabama, whereas District 1 under the Reed Plan includes Mobile County to the south and Tuscaloosa County to the north. District 2 under the Pierce Plan is largely composed of counties in the southeast corner of the state, while the Reed Plan's District 2 stretches from Mobile County, in the extreme southwest corner of the State, to Lee County, in east central Alabama. The Pierce Plan is superior to the Reed Plan in terms of compactness.

The Reock Test indicates that the Reed Plan contains a district which is the least compact of any of the 35 districts analyzed by the Reapportionment Office. The Reed Plan's District 1 has a Reock Test measurement with less than 0.2 and by comparison, the average of the Pierce districts under the Reock Test is 0.41.
The Reock Test is a relatively simple method of measuring the relationship between the area of the district and the area of the smallest possible circumscribing circle. The resulting measure is a number between 1 to 0, with numbers closer to one being more compact. See Kracher v. Dagget, 462 U.S. 725, 756-57, 103 S.Ct. 2653, 2673-74, 77 L.Ed.2d 133 (1983).

28. The Pierce Plan maintains the integrity of individual voting precincts to a far greater degree than does the Reed Plan. The Pierce Plan splits only 10 voting precincts statewide, whereas the Reed Plan splits at least 57. (Plaintiff's Exhibits 2 and 3.) A redistricting plan should minimize precinct splitting when possible because of administrative problems encountered in the conduct of elections when precincts are split.

Furthermore, it is possible to construct a majority African-American district in Alabama using precincts as building blocks.

29. The Pierce Plan splits seven counties. The Reed Plan splits eight counties. The Hilliard Plan splits thirty-one counties.

30. The Pierce Plan also maintains the cores of existing districts to a much greater extent than the Reed Plan. Again, the most striking differences between the plans in this regard are apparent in Districts 1 and 2. There are also significant differences in District 3. The following table reflects the percentage of residents of existing Districts 1, 2, and 3 who remain in those districts under the Pierce and Reed Plans:

District Pierce Reed

1 97.2 64.3 2 86.7 57.0 3 85.2 75.0

31. As a consequence of its apparent disregard for maintaining the cores of existing Districts 1 and 2, the Reed Plan would also separate the incumbent congressmen in those districts from a large percentage of their current constituents. Under the Reed Plan, Congressman Callahan, the incumbent in the present District 1, would be placed in District 2. (Plaintiff's Exhibit 20.) District 2 under the Reed Plan contains only 25.6% of Congressman Callahan's existing constituents. Likewise, the Reed Plan would place Congressman Dickinson, the present incumbent in District 2, in District 3 against District 3's incumbent, Congressman Browder. (Plaintiff's Exhibit 20.) 75.0% of the current residents of District 3 — Congressman Browder's present constituents — are included in the Reed Plan's District 3. However, only 19.0% of Congressman Dickinson's present constituents are included in that District.

32. Another consequence of the Reed Plan's distortion of Districts 1 and 2 is that the Pierce Plan better preserves the communities of interests in those two districts.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

33. The court has jurisdiction pursuant to the authority contained in 28 U.S.C. § 1331, 1343, 2284 and 42 U.S.C. § 1971 et seq.

34. Congressional redistricting is primarily and foremost a state legislative responsibility. It is therefore with great reluctance that we order an interim plan to become effective for the upcoming 1992 elections. It is out of deference to the Legislature that we have delayed our ruling until this time. In fact, we have afforded it every opportunity to fashion its own plan in order that it could fulfil its responsibility under the Constitution.

It was argued that the Legislature was unable to fulfill its obligation to redistrict because the census information it received in February 1991 might be subject to correction. This argument fails because the Supreme Court has previously indicated that the fact that the latest correction of the census is not available at the time the problem is addressed is of no moment to that effort. Karcher v. Dagget, 462 U.S. 725, 729, 103 S.Ct. 2653, 2657-58, 77 L.Ed.2d 133 (1983).

35. Unfortunately, the Legislature has not yet precleared its adopted plan so that it can be in place for the impending elections, and we are bound by the Constitution not to permit these elections under the present districts.

The Alabama law establishes the qualifying date for upcoming primary elections at April 3, 1992, and as noted supra, the ability of the Legislature to preclear its newly adopted plan appears illusory. Those who may desire to seek congressional office, and who must qualify by April 3, 1992, are left in a quandary as to what will be their district, when they are to qualify, when will the primaries actually be conducted, and potentially, whether an election will be held at all. In addition to candidates being left in such a quandary, certain requirements of the law impact on the election officials, including the Probate judges and others, who must conduct these elections. Lastly, the voters are impacted by the effect of potential delays as it affects the quality of their representation in the national legislature. For these reasons, this court finds that there is an emergency that requires judicial attention under the law in order to provide adequate relief for all affected, including the plaintiff. Since this is so, it becomes necessary for the court to consider an appropriate plan in light of the judicial standards imposed in drafting such plans as against those that might be considered by a legislature. Chapman v. Meier, 420 U.S. 1, 95 S.Ct. 751, 42 L.Ed.2d 766 (1975); Connor v. Finch, 431 U.S. 407, 97 S.Ct. 1828, 52 L.Ed.2d 465 (1977).

36. First and foremost, any court ordered redistricting plan must achieve precise population equality among its districts. Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1, 84 S.Ct. 526, 11 L.Ed.2d 481 (1964); Kirkpatrick v. Preisler, 394 U.S. 526, 89 S.Ct. 1225, 22 L.Ed.2d 519 (1969). This is to ensure that "as nearly as is practicable one man's vote in a congressional election will be worth as much as another's." Wesberry, 376 U.S. at 7-8, 84 S.Ct. at 530. Put another way, Art. I, § 2 prohibits any population deviations among districts in a congressional redistricting plan without proper justification. Kirkpatrick, 394 U.S. at 531, 89 S.Ct. at 1229.

37. Among the plans submitted, only two meet this rigorous standard — the Pierce Plan and the Reed Plan. All the other plans which were submitted have unacceptable deviations. Further, none of the proponents of these plans provide an adequate justification for the deviation and we have "no authority to depart from the constitutional mandate of perfect equality in order to achieve some non-constitutional policy" that we believe will serve the public good. Connor, 431 U.S. at 417, 97 S.Ct. at 1835.

Precise population equality is a demanding standard requiring the states to "justify each variance no matter how small." Karcher, 462 U.S. at 730, 103 S.Ct. at 2658 (quoting Kirkpatrick, 394 U.S. at 530-31, 89 S.Ct. at 1229 (citations omitted)). See Hastert v. State Bd. of Elections, 777 F. Supp. 634 (N.D.Ill.1991) (rejecting a plan with a .00297% population deviation because the plan's porponent could not justify its equality inferiority in comparison with another submitted plan with a .00017% deviation).

Some of these parties argue that the population deviations in their plans can be zeroed out easily. This may be so, but we remind the parties that this type of computatioan is notthis court's responsibility. If a party wishes to propose a plan for adoption by a court, then it is incumbent upon party to fashion a plan that comports with the law.

38. If it is possible under constitutional restrictions, a court should consider expressed state policies and preferences. The Reapportionment Committee established guidelines by which to measure a proposed apportionment plan. These guidelines reflect constitutional considerations established by case and statutory law. Any redistricting plan should take into consideration: compactness/contiguity; preservation of political subdivisions; maintenance of communities of interest; and preservation of the core areas of existing districts.

39. Compactness addresses the geographic shape of districts. The most compact district is the district that is configured in the smallest possible area. See Karcher, 462 U.S. at 756-57, 103 S.Ct. at 2673-74. Preservation of political subdivisions promotes efficient representation, empowers a constituency's ability to organize productively, and serves as a deterrent to partisan gerrymandering. Burton v. Hobbie, 561 F. Supp. 1029, 1035 (M.D.Ala. 1983); Ely v. Klahr, 403 U.S. 108, 91 S.Ct. 1803, 29 L.Ed.2d 352 (1971). Protecting communities of interest is meant to keep intact "distinctive units which share common concerns with respect to one or more identifiable features such as geography, demography, ethnicity, culture, socio-economic status or trade." Carstens v. Lamm, 543 F. Supp. 68 (D.C.Colo. 1982). Preserving cores of existing congressional districts prevents needless modifications and avoids pitting two incumbent congressmen against one another. Karcher, 462 U.S. at 740, 103 S.Ct. at 2663. Based on the findings made above, we conclude that the Pierce Plan better satisfies the above criteria than does the Reed Plan, or any of the other plans.

40. With regard to the majority African-American district, the parties entered into the following stipulation:

According to 1990 data compiled and released by the United States Bureau of the Census, the African American population in the State of Alabama is sufficiently compact and contiguous to comprise a single member significant majority (65% or more) African American Congressional district. Consequently, all parties agree that a significant majority African American Congressional district should be created.

(Supplemental Stipulation dated January 3, 1992.) This stipulation avoided the necessity of the court considering prolonged testimony regarding whether § 2 of the Voting Rights Act requires the creation of such a district under the circumstances present in this case. This court will honor the stipulation, and accordingly, will not make an independent determination of whether § 2 of the Voting Rights Act requires the creation of a majority African-American congressional district in Alabama at this time. The court has found that the Pierce Plan creates a majority African-American district that provides African-Americans a reasonable opportunity to elect a candidate of their choice, and does so without the need for extensive gerrymandering. The court deems it inappropriate to make a judicial determination relative to what § 2 requires under the circumstances present in this case in light of the stipulation; the parties do not contest the matter and therefore it would be imprudent for the court to address it. This case does not require this court to decide whether the creation of a majority African-American district is mandated by either § 2 or the Constitution and as a matter of judicial restraint we do not undertake to do so.

41. Therefore, having followed the mandate in Karcher, while keeping in mind the desirability of preserving compactness, cores of all districts, communities of interest, and political subdivisions, we adopt the Pierce Plan except to the extent mentioned below.

When no plan submitted to a court fully comports with objectives and criteria that should be incorporated in a judicially approved plan, a court should fashion its own plan to satisfy relevant legal criteria and incorporate the most desirable aspects of the plans presented to the court. Carstens v. Lamm, 543 F. Supp. 68 (D.C.Colo.1982).

First, we have discovered no justifiable basis for the fact that the Pierce Plan places Congressman Erdreich and Congressman Harris in the same district. The Supreme Court has recognized the policy of "avoiding contests between incumbent representatives" as a legitimate objective. Karcher, 462 U.S. at 740, 103 S.Ct. at 2663. See also Burton v. Hobbie, 561 F. Supp. at 1035. Accordingly, we have modified the Pierce Plan so that the two congressmen will not be in the same district. Second, in working to achieve zero population deviation and redesign Districts 6 and 7, the affected districts were made marginally more compact in Jefferson and Tuscaloosa counties.

42. The court adopts a redistricting plan to be used in the conduct of congressional elections for the State of Alabama (to be called "The 1992 Alabama Redistricting Plan") in the event the Alabama Legislature fails to have precleared a redistricting plan in time for the conduct of those elections without delay under applicable state and federal laws. The plan is verbally described in Appendix A to Professor Stanley's report dated January 22, 1992. ( See Order, Doc. # 97). Appendix B to that report is a map depicting the plan. The map is appended simply to illustrate the plan, and Appendix A shall control in the event of any conflict between it and Appendix B. Appendix C to that report includes certain statistical data which the court finds to be accurate, none of the parties having posed objections to that data in response to this court's order.

43. A motion pending seeks a stay of any order by this court adopting a plan pending preclearance. We have reserved ruling on the motion until now. We conclude that there is no requirement that the plan which we now adopt be precleared before it becomes operative.

Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. sec; 1973c, requires a governmental body to obtain preclearance of a porposed plan either by securing a declaratory judgment from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia or by submitting the change to the Attorney General of the United States. As long as the Attorney General has not interposed an objection within sixty days after such submission, the state may enforce the change.

44. First, the plan that we now adopt is a "court decreed" plan. Connor v. Johnson, 402 U.S. 690, 91 S.Ct. 1760, 29 L.Ed.2d 268 (1971). It is clear that a plan must be precleared only if it is a "legislative plan." McDaniel v. Sanchez, 452 U.S. 130, 137, 101 S.Ct. 2224, 2229-30, 68 L.Ed.2d 724 (1981). "[T]he essential characteristic of a legislative plan is the exercise of legislative judgment . . . [that is], a proposal reflecting the policy choices of the elected representatives of the people. . . ." Id. at 152-53, 101 S.Ct. at 2238. See also 28 C.F.R. § 51.18 (1991) (stating that, in general, "changes affecting voting that are ordered by a federal court are subject to the preclearance requirements of section 5 to the extent that they reflect the policy choices of the submitting authority.").

The plan which this court adopts today is substantially the same as the plan offered by Plaintiff Wesch. Neither he, nor the party he is affiliated with, can claim to be exercising legislative judgment. We are certain that the Pierce Plan does not reflect the policy choices of the elected representative of the people. Cf. McDaniel v. Sanchez, 452 U.S. 130, 101 S.Ct. 2224, 68 L.Ed.2d 724 (1981) (holding that a reapportionment plan submitted to a court by the legislative body of a covered jurisdiction was a legislative plan); Campos v. City of Baytown, Texas, 840 F.2d 1240 (5th Cir. 1988) (holding that plan proposed by the city was a legislative plan), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 905, 109 S.Ct. 3213, 106 L.Ed.2d 564 (1989); Farnum v. Burns, 561 F. Supp. 83, 92 (D.R.I. 1983) (holding that plan drafted by a legislative consultant under the direction of the legislative body reflected the policy choices of the elected representative and was therefore a legislative plan).

45. Alternatively, it appears that the Legislature will not have a plan precleared in time to be in place for the April 3, 1992 qualifying deadline. For that reason, the situation calls for emergency action by this court. The Supreme Court acknowledged this exception to preclearance in Upham v. Seamon, 456 U.S. 37, 44, 102 S.Ct. 1518, 1522-23, 71 L.Ed.2d 725 (1982):

It is true that we have authorized District Courts to order or to permit elections to be held pursuant to apportionment plans that do not in all respects measure up to the legal requirements, even constitutional requirements. Necessity has been the motivating factor in these situations. (citations omitted).

The Court later reaffirmed this exception in McDaniel v. Sanchez, 452 U.S. 130, 153 n. 35, 101 S.Ct. 2224, 2238 n. 35, 68 L.Ed.2d 724 (1981), noting the ample power of the district courts to fashion interim plans. See also Burton v. Hobbie, 561 F. Supp. at 1036 (recognizing the authority of a court to implement an interim plan so that an election can be held); 28 C.F.R. § 51.18(c) (1991) (acknowledging a federal court's authority to approve a plan without preclearance: "A federal court's authorization of the emergency interim use without preclearance of a voting change does not exempt from section 5 review any use of the practice not explicitly authorized by the court.").

For the foregoing reasons, the Motion is Denied.

46. We find that, at a minimum, district lines should become fixed one week prior to the April 3, 1992 qualifying date for candidates to allow both candidates and election officials the necessary time to evaluate them and choose their future conduct accordingly.

CONCLUSION

Congressional redistricting is a state legislature's fundamental task, but it becomes a judicial duty when a legislature fails to adopt and preclear a plan after having adequate opportunity to do so.

At the time this opinion is released, it is reported, although evidence of such is not before the court, that the Alabama legislature has passed a redistricting plan. It is also reported that the plan has not received preclearance by the Attorney General of the United States under § 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

Since this court recognizes that congressional redistricting is properly a matter to be determined by the legislature and that the federal courts should intervene only if the legislature fails to act in a constitutional manner, the question arises: Why should the court not consider the legislature's belatedly adopted plan and, if it is found by the court to comply with constitutional and legal requirements, adopt this expression of the legislative will as the court's plan and order it into effect immediately? The answer is that this court has no legal authority to do so.

Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act requires a legislative plan to be submitted to the Attorney General for approval before it can be put into effect. The Attorney General has a period of 60 days to study the plan and express any objections he might have to it or to any of its provisions.

The Supreme Court has made clear that this requirement of the Voting Rights Act cannot be put aside by having a legislative plan approved by a federal district court (other than the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia). McDaniel v. Sanchez, 452 U.S. at 130, 101 S.Ct. at 2224; United States v. Board of Supervisors, 429 U.S. 642, 97 S.Ct. 833, 51 L.Ed.2d 106 (1977).

Thus, if we adopted the reported legislative plan, it would still be subject to the preclearance requirement, which might well require postponement of the primaries. This we are unwilling to do.

It should be clearly understood that this court does not wish to compete with the state legislature as to where congressional district lines should be drawn. It is, however, our responsibility to ensure that the voters of this state have the opportunity to choose their members of Congress from constitutionally drawn districts when elections are held at the time set by state law.

If the plan reportedly adopted by the legislature should be precleared by some expedited method no later than 12:00 noon, Central Time, March 27, 1992, one week before the statutory deadline for candidates to qualify to run, as set out herein, then that plan will take effect and those will be the congressional districts for the 1992 election. Otherwise, the legislature will have defaulted in its obligation to the people of the state and the plan described herein will take effect.

The plan adopted by this court shall become operative and controlling for the 1992 congressional elections. Additionally, it shall govern the conduct of congressional elections after 1992 unless and until the Legislature for the State of Alabama adopts a plan and has it precleared in time for such elections to proceed without delay under applicable law.

The court will by separate document enter judgment consistent with this opinion.

FINAL JUDGMENT

It is ordered, adjudged, and decreed as follows:

1. It is declared that Ala. Code § 17-20-1 (1987), as it read prior to its amendment in 1992, if applied to congressional elections in 1992, violates Art. I, § 2 of the United States Constitution.

2. The defendants, individually, and their successors, agents, employees, attorneys, and those persons otherwise acting in concert or in participation with them who receive actual notice of this order, are ENJOINED from:

(a) conducting congressional elections in the State of Alabama under the districting plan heretofore established by Ala. Code § 17-20-1 (1987) as that section read prior to its 1992 amendment;

(b) failing to conduct congressional elections in 1992 in accordance with a redistricting plan adopted by this court and called "The 1992 Alabama Redistricting Plan," which is verbally described in Appendix A to this order. [Page 1512.] Appendix B to this order is a map depicting the plan. [Page 1582.] (The map is appended simply to illustrate the plan, and Appendix A shall control in the event of any conflict between it and Appendix B). Provided, however, that the injunction contained in this paragraph (b) shall not be effective if the Alabama Legislature duly enacts a redistricting plan for the conduct of congressional elections in 1992 and has the same precleared no later than 12:00 noon, Central Time, March 27, 1992; and

(c) failing to conduct congressional elections in calendar years after 1992 in accordance with the 1992 Alabama Redistricting Plan described in paragraph (b) above. Provided, however, that the injunction contained in this paragraph (c) shall not be effective in the event the Alabama Legislature duly enacts a redistricting plan and has the same precleared in accordance with federal law in time for congressional elections to proceed without delay under then applicable state and federal law.

All the Judges concur.

The advancement of information porcessing technologies in the last decade since Karcher have raised the deciation standard to an "absolute population equality," giving greater authority to the Court's 1983 statement that "rapid advances in computer technology and education during the last two decades make it relatively simple to draw contiguous districts of equal population and at the same time to further whatever secondary goals the state has." Karcher, 462 U.S. at 732, 103 S.Ct. at 2659.

APPENDIX A DB: ALABAMA District Statistics Date: 11/21/91 Total Populations, All Ages Time: 12:11 p.m. Plan Cong. Districts Gumby Page: 1 Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS District Number Total Ideal District % District Name Members Population Population Variance Variance ---- ------- ----------- ---------- --------- -------- District 1 1 593,911 577,227 16,684 2.89% District 2 1 569,423 577,227 -7,804 -1.35% District 3 1 565,135 577,227 -12,092 -2.09% District 4 1 573,868 577,227 -3,359 -0.58% District 5 1 603,726 577,227 26,499 4.59% District 6 1 532,748 577,227 -44,479 -7.71% District 7 1 601,776 577,227 24,549 4.25% Total 7 4,040,587 4,040,589 -2 0.00% PLANWIDE STATISTICS: Range of populations: 532,748 to 603.726 Ratio range: 1.1332 Absolute range: -44,479 to 26,499 Absolute overall range: 70,978 Relative range: -7.71 to 4.59% Relative overall range: 12.30% Absolute mean deviation: 19352.29 Absolute mean deviation: 3.35% Standard deviation: 23237.8677 APPENDIX B DB: ALABAMA District Summary Date: 11/21/91 Total Populations. All Ages Time: 12:12 p.m. Plan: Cong. Districts Gumby Page: 1 Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS District Total Total Total Total Total Total Name Pop. White Black Am. Ind. Asian/PI Other ---- ---- ----- ----- -------- -------- ----- District 1 593,911 408,778 175,531 4,951 3,786 865 100.00% 68.83% 29.56% 0.83% 0.64% 0.15% District 2 569,423 381,279 182,021 1,593 3,285 1,245 100.00% 66.96% 31.97% 0.28% 0.58% 0.22% District 3 565,135 403,218 156,724 1,133 3,132 928 100.00% 71.35% 27.73% 0.20% 0.55% 0.16% District 4 573,868 530,503 40,004 1,647 1,063 651 100.00% 92.44% 6.97% 0.29% 0.19% 0.11% District 5 603,726 503,616 88,353 5,505 5,158 1,094 100.00% 83.42% 14.63% 0.91% 0.85% 0.18% District 6 532,748 331,711 196,872 730 2,936 499 100.00% 62.26% 36.95% 0.14% 0.55% 0.09% District 7 601,776 416,692 181,200 947 2,437 500 100.00% 69.24% 30.11% 0.16% 0.40% 0.08% Total 4,040,587 2,975,797 1,020,705 16,506 21,797 5,782 100.00% 73.65% 25.26% 0.41% 0.54% 0.14% District Summary DB: ALABAMA Total Populations, All Ages Plan: Cong. Districts Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS District Total Total Total Total Total Total Name Pop. White Black Am. Ind. Asian/PI Other ---- ------ ----- ----- -------- -------- ----- District 1 593,911 408,778 175,531 4,951 3,786 865 District 2 569,423 381,279 182,021 1,593 3,285 1,245 District 3 565,135 403,218 156,724 1,133 3,132 928 District 4 573,868 530,503 40,004 1,647 1,063 651 District 5 603,726 503,616 88,353 5,505 5,158 1,094 District 6 532,748 331,711 196,872 730 2,936 499 District 7 601,776 416,692 181,200 947 2,437 500 APPENDIX C REAPPORTIONMENT OFFICE 11 SOUTH UNION, ROOM 811 MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36130 (205) 242-7941 DB: ALABAMA Attributes of Census Units Date: 6/11/91 Within Alabama Time: 9:53 a.m. Total Populations, All Ages Page: 1 Census Total Total Total Total Total Total Unit Pop. White Black Am. Ind. Asian/PI Other ---- ---- ----- ----- -------- -------- ----- Autauga County 34,222 27,144 6,845 71 120 42 100.00% 79.32% 20.00% 0.21% 0.35% 0.12% Baldwin County 98,280 84,565 12,640 630 221 224 100.00% 86.04% 12.86% 0.64% 0.22% 0.23% Barbour County 25,417 14,118 11,194 46 44 15 100.00% 55.55% 44.04% 0.18% 0.17% 0.06% Bibb County 16,576 13,052 3,478 25 11 10 100.00% 78.74% 20.98% 0.15% 0.07% 0.06% Blount County 39,248 38,397 521 133 33 164 100.00% 97.83% 1.33% 0.34% 0.08% 0.42% Bullock County 11,042 3,036 7,986 8 10 2 100.00% 27.50% 72.32% 0.07% 0.09% 0.02% Butler County 21,892 13,049 8,798 24 19 2 100.00% 59.61% 40.19% 0.11% 0.09% 0.01% Calhoun County 116,034 92,873 21,578 296 869 418 100.00% 80.04% 18.60% 0.26% 0.75% 0.36% Chambers County 36,876 23,575 13,221 41 13 26 100.00% 63.93% 35.85% 0.11% 0.04% 0.07% Cherokee County 19,543 18,154 1,291 51 24 23 100.00% 92.89% 6.61% 0.26% 0.12% 0.12% Chilton County 32,458 28,647 3,674 63 38 36 100.00% 88.26% 11.32% 0.19% 0.12% 0.11% Choctaw County 16,018 8,913 7,077 10 12 6 100.00% 55.64% 44.18% 0.06% 0.07% 0.04% Clarke County 27,240 15,527 11,625 45 35 8 100.00% 57.00% 42.68% 0.17% 0.13% 0.03% Clay County 13,252 11,044 2,166 23 13 6 100.00% 83.34% 16.34% 0.17% 0.10% 0.05% Cleburne County 12,730 12,084 587 20 13 26 100.00% 94.93% 4.61% 0.16% 0.10% 0.20% Coffee County 40,240 32,702 6,917 163 317 141 100.00% 81.27% 17.19% 0.41% 0.79% 0.35% Colbert County 51,666 42,820 8,568 137 93 48 100.00% 82.88% 16.58% 0.27% 0.18% 0.09% Conecuh County 14,054 8,063 5,925 43 13 10 100.00% 57.37% 42.16% 0.31% 0.09% 0.07% Coosa County 11,063 7,242 3,782 34 4 1 100.00% 65.46% 34.19% 0.31% 0.04% 0.01% Covington County 36,478 31,551 4,777 72 48 30 100.00% 86.49% 13.10% 0.20% 0.13% 0.08% Crenshaw County 13,635 10,048 3,544 27 11 5 100.00% 73.69% 25.99% 0.20% 0.08% 0.04% Cullman County 67,613 66,744 560 134 117 58 100.00% 98.71% 0.83% 0.20% 0.17% 0.09% Dale County 49,633 39,365 8,847 239 731 451 100.00% 79.31% 17.82% 0.48% 1.47% 0.91% Dallas County 48,130 20,121 27,825 41 129 14 100.00% 41.81% 57.81% 0.09% 0.27% 0.03% DeKalb County 54,651 52,980 1,028 481 77 85 100.00% 96.94% 1.88% 0.88% 0.14% 0.16% Elmore County 49,210 37,850 11,039 137 129 55 100.00% 76.92% 22.43% 0.28% 0.26% 0.11% Escambia County 35,518 24,326 10,046 1,047 58 41 100.00% 68.49% 28.28% 2.95% 0.16% 0.12% Etowah County 99,840 85,274 13,799 250 419 98 100.00% 85.41% 13.82% 0.25% 0.42% 0.10% Fayette County 17,962 15,717 2,190 9 19 27 100.00% 87.50% 12.19% 0.05% 0.11% 0.15% Franklin County 27,814 26,463 1,249 57 35 10 100.00% 95.14% 4.49% 0.20% 0.13% 0.04% Geneva County 23,647 20,682 2,824 93 15 33 100.00% 87.46% 11.94% 0.39% 0.06% 0.14% Greene County 10,153 1,966 8,181 3 0 3 100.00% 19.36% 80.58% 0.03% 0.00% 0.03% Hale County 15,498 6,255 9,214 20 9 0 100.00% 40.36% 59.45% 0.13% 0.06% 0.00% Henry County 15,374 9,918 5,395 31 6 24 100.00% 64.51% 35.09% 0.20% 0.04% 0.16% Houston County 81,331 61,513 18,954 287 470 107 100.00% 75.63% 23.30% 0.35% 0.58% 0.13% Jackson County 47,796 44,696 1,968 1,020 90 22 100.00% 93.51% 4.12% 2.13% 0.19% 0.05% Jefferson County 651,525 418,317 228,521 889 3,222 576 100.00% 64.21% 35.07% 0.14% 0.49% 0.09% Lamar County 15,715 13,805 1,862 24 10 14 100.00% 87.85% 11.85% 0.15% 0.06% 0.09% Lauderdale County 79,661 71,560 7,695 165 196 45 100.00% 89.83% 9.66% 0.21% 0.25% 0.06% Lawrence County 31,513 24,563 4,798 2,124 19 9 100.00% 77.95% 15.23% 6.74% 0.06% 0.03% Lee County 87,146 64,889 20,407 132 1,584 134 100.00% 74.46% 23.42% 0.15% 1.82% 0.15% Limestone County 54,135 46,658 7,127 148 158 44 100.00% 86.19% 13.17% 0.27% 0.29% 0.08% Lowndes County 12,658 3,185 9,456 10 4 3 100.00% 25.16% 74.70% 0.08% 0.03% 0.02% Macon County 24,928 3,443 21,340 24 99 22 100.00% 13.81% 85.61% 0.10% 0.40% 0.09% Madison County 238,912 184,197 48,116 1,601 4,232 766 100.00% 77.10% 20.14% 0.67% 1.77% 0.32% Marengo County 23,084 11,314 11,745 11 11 3 100.00% 49.01% 50.88% 0.05% 0.05% 0.01% Marion County 29,830 28,759 967 57 35 12 100.00% 96.41% 3.24% 0.19% 0.12% 0.04% Marshall County 70,832 69,361 1,087 231 111 42 100.00% 97.92% 1.53% 0.33% 0.16% 0.06% Mobile County 378,643 254,853 117,872 1,940 3,398 580 100.00% 67.31% 31.13% 0.51% 0.90% 0.15% Monroe County 23,968 14,320 9,372 215 54 7 100.00% 59.75% 39.10% 0.90% 0.23% 0.03% Montgomery County 209,085 119,420 87,312 414 1,533 406 100.00% 57.12% 41.76% 0.20% 0.73% 0.19% Morgan County 100,043 89,122 10,081 310 370 160 100.00% 89.08% 10.08% 0.31% 0.37% 0.16% Perry County 12,759 4,503 8,219 16 14 7 100.00% 35.29% 64.42% 0.13% 0.11% 0.05% Pickens County 20,699 12,002 8,645 24 27 1 100.00% 57.98% 41.77% 0.12% 0.13% 0.00% Pike County 27,595 17,814 9,548 146 68 19 100.00% 64.56% 34.60% 0.53% 0.25% 0.07% Randolph County 19,881 15,138 4,686 29 21 7 100.00% 76.14% 23.57% 0.15% 0.11% 0.04% Russell County 46,860 28,473 18,088 90 117 92 100.00% 60.76% 38.60% 0.19% 0.25% 0.20% St. Clair County 50,009 45,138 4,561 136 77 97 100.00% 90.26% 9.12% 0.27% 0.15% 0.19% Shelby County 99,358 90,715 7,718 264 575 86 100.00% 91.30% 7.77% 0.27% 0.58% 0.09% Sumter County 16,174 4,759 11,369 6 30 10 100.00% 29.42% 70.29% 0.04% 0.19% 0.06% Talladega County 74,107 50,970 22,773 174 113 77 100.00% 68.78% 30.73% 0.23% 0.15% 0.10% Tallapoosa County 38,826 28,493 10,212 62 37 22 100.00% 73.39% 26.30% 0.16% 0.10% 0.06% Tuscaloosa County 150,522 109,398 39,377 253 1,264 230 100.00% 72.68% 26.16% 0.17% 0.84% 0.15% Walker County 67,670 63,042 4,405 84 107 32 100.00% 93.16% 6.51% 0.12% 0.16% 0.05% Washington County 16,694 10,984 4,623 1,068 14 5 100.00% 65.80% 27.69% 6.40% 0.08% 0.03% Wilcox County 13,568 4,203 9,353 6 6 0 100.00% 30.98% 68.93% 0.04% 0.04% 0.00% Winston County 22,053 21,925 57 42 26 3 100.00% 99.42% 0.26% 0.19% 0.12% 0.01% Total Alabama 4,040,587 2,975,797 1,020,705 16,506 21,797 5,782 100.00% 73.65% 25.26% 0.41% 0.54% 0.14% APPENDIX D REAPPORTIONMENT OFFICE 11 SOUTH UNION, ROOM 811 MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36130 (205) 242-7941 DB: ALABAMA Attributes of Census Units Date: 7/31 Within Alabama Time: 2:41 p.m. Ethnic Breakdown of Voting Age Populations Page: 1 Census Total Vot. Age Vot. Age Vot. Age Vot. Age Vot. Age Unit Vot. Age White Black Am. Ind. Asian/PI Other ---- -------- ----- ----- -------- -------- ----- Autauga County 24,124 19,593 4,366 48 90 2 70.49% 57.25% 12.76% 0.14% 0.26% 0.08 Baldwin County 72,747 64,059 7,938 459 159 13 74.02% 65.18% 8.08% 0.47% 0.16% 0.13 Barbour County 17,953 10,744 7,130 36 30 1 70.63% 42.27% 28.05% 0.14% 0.12% 0.05 Bibb County 11,783 9,617 2,138 16 8 71.08% 58.02% 12.90% 0.10% 0.05% 0.02 Blount County 29,212 28,615 366 94 24 11 74.43% 72.91% 0.93% 0.24% 0.06% 0.29 Bullock County 7,661 2,513 5,131 7 8 69.38% 22.76% 46.47% 0.06% 0.07% 0.02 Butler County 15,301 9,919 5,357 15 9 69.89% 45.31% 24.47% 0.07% 0.04% 0.00 Calhoun County 87,056 71,217 14,702 241 603 29 75.03% 61.38% 12.67% 0.21% 0.52% 0.25 Chambers County 27,244 18,499 8,685 30 10 2 73.88% 50.17% 23.55% 0.08% 0.03% 0.05 Cherokee County 14,851 13,881 898 39 18 1 75.99% 71.03% 4.59% 0.20% 0.09% 0.08 Chilton County 23,771 21,320 2,361 47 24 1 73.24% 65.68% 7.27% 0.14% 0.07% 0.06 Choctaw County 11,310 6,700 4,592 7 8 70.61% 41.83% 28.67% 0.04% 0.05% 0.02 Clarke County 19,085 11,684 7,346 29 22 70.06% 42.89% 26.97% 0.11% 0.08% 0.01 Clay County 9,934 8,497 1,407 16 10 74.96% 64.12% 10.62% 0.12% 0.08% 0.03 Cleburne County 9,418 8,983 388 15 11 2 73.98% 70.57% 3.05% 0.12% 0.09% 0.16 Coffee County 29,913 24,882 4,577 118 234 10 74.34% 61.83% 11.37% 0.29% 0.58% 0.25 Colbert County 39,118 33,112 5,825 96 54 3 75.71% 64.09% 11.27% 0.19% 0.10% 0.06 Conecuh County 10,136 6,278 3,815 27 11 72.12% 44.67% 27.15% 0.19% 0.08% 0.04 Coosa County 8,181 5,579 2,576 21 4 73.95% 50.43% 23.28% 0.19% 0.04% 0.01 Covington County 27,241 24,039 3,086 56 32 2 74.68% 65.90% 8.46% 0.15% 0.09% 0.08 Crenshaw County 9,991 7,613 2,345 22 7 73.27% 55.83% 17.20% 0.16% 0.05% 0.03 Cullman County 50,601 49,994 386 98 80 4 74.84% 73.94% 0.57% 0.14% 0.12% 0.06 Dale County 35,757 29,228 5,529 184 518 29 72.04% 58.89% 11.14% 0.37% 1.04% 0.60 Dallas County 33,025 15,449 17,445 32 91 68.62% 32.10% 36.25% 0.07% 0.19% 0.02 DeKalb County 40,744 39,666 694 283 43 5 74.55% 72.58% 1.27% 0.52% 0.08% 0.11 Elmore County 36,418 28,496 7,696 105 87 3 74.01% 57.91% 15.64% 0.21% 0.18% 0.07 Escambia County 26,051 18,450 6,840 703 32 2 73.35% 51.95% 19.26% 1.98% 0.09% 0.07 Etowah County 75,251 65,349 9,299 182 353 6 75.37% 65.45% 9.31% 0.18% 0.35% 0.07 Fayette County 13,360 11,801 1,523 6 11 1 74.38% 65.70% 8.48% 0.03% 0.06% 0.11 Franklin County 20,910 19,978 867 39 19 75.18% 71.83% 3.12% 0.14% 0.07% 0.03 Geneva County 17,757 15,821 1,837 71 12 1 75.09% 66.90% 7.77% 0.30% 0.05% 0.07 Greene County 6,811 1,641 5,165 3 0 67.08% 16.16% 50.87% 0.03% 0.00% 0.02 Hale County 10,616 4,772 5,829 11 4 68.50% 30.79% 37.61% 0.07% 0.03% 0.00 Henry County 11,273 7,667 3,561 24 6 1 73.33% 49.87% 23.16% 0.16% 0.04% 0.10 Houston County 58,858 46,249 12,041 214 288 6 72.37% 56.87% 14.80% 0.26% 0.35% 0.08 Jackson County 35,482 33,503 1,342 563 57 1 74.24% 70.10% 2.81% 1.18% 0.12% 0.04 Jefferson County 488,937 328,268 157,208 697 2,359 40 75.05% 50.38% 24.13% 0.11% 0.36% 0.06 Lamar County 11,725 10,434 1,253 17 10 1 74.61% 66.40% 7.97% 0.11% 0.06% 0.07 Lauderdale County 60,580 55,008 5,275 128 137 3 76.05% 69.05% 6.62% 0.16% 0.17% 0.04 Lawrence County 22,874 18,702 3,095 1,061 12 72.59% 59.35% 9.82% 3.37% 0.04% 0.01 Lee County 68,058 52,769 13,846 108 1,226 10 78.10% 60.55% 15.89% 0.12% 1.41% 0.13 Limestone County 40,529 35,087 5,197 113 101 3 74.87% 64.81% 9.60% 0.21% 0.19% 0.06 Lowndes County 8,263 2,513 5,742 4 3 65.28% 19.85% 45.36% 0.03% 0.02% 0.01 Macon County 18,286 2,780 15,397 18 74 1 73.36% 11.15% 61.77% 0.07% 0.30% 0.07 Madison County 180,157 142,174 33,542 945 2,999 49 75.41% 59.51% 14.04% 0.40% 1.26% 0.21 Marengo County 16,091 8,524 7,550 10 7 69.71% 36.93% 32.71% 0.04% 0.03% 0.00 Marion County 22,508 21,733 712 33 23 75.45% 72.86% 2.39% 0.11% 0.08% 0.02 Marshall County 53,366 52,343 766 161 76 2 75.34% 73.90% 1.08% 0.23% 0.11% 0.03 Mobile County 270,610 190,842 75,791 1,286 2,279 41 71.47% 50.40% 20.02% 0.34% 0.60% 0.11 Monroe County 16,590 10,597 5,806 152 31 69.22% 44.21% 24.22% 0.63% 0.13% 0.02 Montgomery County 151,701 92,603 57,450 303 1,072 27 72.55% 44.29% 27.48% 0.14% 0.51% 0.13 Morgan County 74,027 66,930 6,538 208 244 10 74.00% 66.90% 6.54% 0.21% 0.24% 0.11 Perry County 8,757 3,719 5,009 9 14 68.63% 29.15% 39.26% 0.07% 0.11% 0.05 Pickens County 14,805 9,369 5,401 17 17 71.53% 45.26% 26.09% 0.08% 0.08% 0.00 Pike County 20,729 14,208 6,348 92 63 1 75.12% 51.49% 23.00% 0.33% 0.23% 0.07 Randolph County 14,696 11,650 3,012 19 12 73.92% 58.60% 15.15% 0.10% 0.06% 0.02 Russell County 34,380 21,762 12,396 67 95 6 73.37% 46.44% 26.45% 0.14% 0.20% 0.13 St. Clair County 36,699 33,259 3,230 106 51 5 73.38% 66.51% 6.46% 0.21% 0.10% 0.11 Shelby County 72,167 66,406 5,147 179 379 5 72.63% 66.84% 5.18% 0.18% 0.38% 0.06 Sumter County 11,202 3,869 7,291 5 28 69.26% 23.92% 45.08% 0.03% 0.17% 0.06 Talladega County 53,614 38,551 14,805 129 79 5 72.35% 52.02% 19.98% 0.17% 0.11% 0.07 Tallapoosa County 28,899 22,100 6,718 41 25 1 74.43% 56.92% 17.30% 0.11% 0.06% 0.04 Tuscaloosa County 114,857 86,831 26,623 195 1,022 18 76.31% 57.69% 17.69% 0.13% 0.68% 0.12 Walker County 50,560 47,546 2,847 67 79 2 74.72% 70.26% 4.21% 0.10% 0.12% 0.03 Washington County 11,611 8,033 2,916 645 12 69.55% 48.12% 17.47% 3.86% 0.07% 0.03 Wilcox County 8,956 3,297 5,649 6 4 66.01% 24.30% 41.63% 0.04% 0.03% 0.00 Winston County 16,621 16,530 38 31 19 75.37% 74.96% 0.17% 0.14% 0.09% 0.01 Total Alabama 2,981,799 2,273,845 677,681 10,809 15,529 3,93 73.80% 56.28% 16.77% 0.27% 0.38% 0.10

APPENDIX E

District Name/Address Census Residence
1 Sonny Callahan (R) Mobile County 3251 Riviere Du Chien Drive Tract 20 Mobile, AL Block 231 Voting District #0360

FIRST ELECTED: NOVEMBER, 1984

2 Bill Dickinson (R) Montgomery County 2350 Woodley Road Tract 20 Montgomery, AL Block 311 Voting District #0180

FIRST ELECTED: NOVEMBER, 1964

3 Glen Browder (D) Calhoun County 517 Pelham Street, North Tract 21 Jacksonville, AL Block 510 Voting District #0010

FIRST ELECTED: APRIL, 1989

4 Tom Bevill (D) Walker County 1600 Alabama Avenue Tract 203 Jasper, AL Block 173 Voting District #0010

FIRST ELECTED: NOVEMBER, 1989

5 Bud Cramer (D) Madison County 417 Eustis Street Tract 1 Huntsville, AL Block 234 Voting District #0060

FIRST ELECTED: NOVEMBER, 1982

6 Ben Erdreich (D) Jefferson County 2625 Highland Avenue, South Tract 47.01 Birmingham, AL Block 723 Voting District #5408

FIRST ELECTED: NOVEMBER, 1982

7 Clause Harris (D) Tuscaloosa County 3121 Azalea Lane East Tract 123.01 (41st Avenue) Block 143 Tuscaloosa, AL Voting District #0160

FIRST ELECTED: NOVEMBER, 1986

APPENDIX A TO FINAL JUDGMENT "Units Assigned to a District"

The following description lists the census geographical units (as contained within the State computer's reapportionment data base) composing each congressional district. When a county is entirely within a congressional district the county and its population are listed as a single line. For the seven counties split by congressional district lines, the county name is listed without population figures and subsequent lines give voting precincts and population figures for each precinct in that county. For the ten voting precincts split by congressional district lines, the name of the precinct is listed without population figures, followed by lines listing the census tract, the census block group number, and then the census block within each tract and block group, with population figures. Lines at the end of each block group, tract, precinct, or county listing give summary population totals for that unit in the particular congressional district. DB: ALABAMA Units Assigned to a District Date: 1/21/92 Plan:REDISTRICT District 1 Time: 3:16 p.m. Total Populations, All Ages Page: 1 Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS Census Total Total Total Total Total Total Unit Pop. White Black Am.Ind. Asian/PI Other ---- ---- ----- ----- ------- -------- ----- Baldwin County 98,280 84,565 12,640 630 221 224 100.00% 86.04% 12.86% 0.64% 0.22% 0.23% Clarke County CARLTON/GAINESTOWN/CHOCTAW 2,018 319 1,694 1 3 1 100.00% 15.81% 83.94% 0.05% 0.15% 0.05% JACKSON 3,606 1,567 2,025 13 0 1 100.00% 43.46% 56.16% 0.36% 0.00% 0.03% WALKER SPRINGS 586 263 319 4 0 0 100.00% 44.88% 54.44% 0.68% 0.00% 0.00% ALLEN 391 22 369 0 0 0 100.00% 5,63% 94.37% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% MCVAY/PARKERTOWN/JACKSON 4,405 3,580 807 6 9 3 100.00% 81.27% 18.32% 0.14% 0.20% 0.07% SALITPA Tract 9579 Block Group 1 Block 109 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 111 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 112 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 113 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 114 21 0 21 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 115 103 63 40 0 0 0 100.00% 61.17% 38.83% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 116 23 7 16 0 0 0 100.00% 30.43% 69.57% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 117 52 0 52 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 118 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 119 95 95 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 121 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 144 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 145 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 199B 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 199C 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 199D 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 199E 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 199F 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 199G 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Block Group 1 294 165 129 0 0 0 100.00% 56.12% 43.88% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block Group 8 Block 801 25 22 3 0 0 0 100.00% 88.00% 12.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 802 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 803 27 0 27 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 804 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 899D 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 899E 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Block Group 8 52 22 30 0 0 0 100.00% 42.31% 57.69% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Track 9579 346 187 159 0 0 0 100.00% 54.05% 45.95% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total SALITPA 346 187 159 0 0 0 100.00% 54.05% 45.95% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% WINN/ZIMCO Tract 9577 Block Group 2 Block 230 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 231 58 13 45 0 0 0 100.00% 22.41% 77.59% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 232 1 0 1 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Water block 299A 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Block Group 2 59 13 46 0 0 0 100.00% 22.03% 77.97% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Track 9577 59 13 46 0 0 0 100.00% 22.03% 77.97% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Track 9578 Block Group 6 Block 612 5 5 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Block Group 6 5 5 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block Group 7 Block 707 16 6 10 0 0 0 100.00% 37.50% 62.50% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 708 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Block Group 7 16 6 10 0 0 0 100.00% 37.50% 62.50% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Track 9578 21 11 10 0 0 0 100.00% 52.38% 47.62% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Tract 9579 Block Group 1 Block 101 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 102 15 10 5 0 0 0 100.00% 66.67% 33.33% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 103 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 107 2 2 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 123 59 20 38 1 0 0 100.00% 33.90% 64.41% 1.69% 0.00% 0.00% Block 124 167 45 122 0 0 0 100.00% 26.95% 73.05% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 125 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 126 156 11 145 0 0 0 100.00% 7.05% 92.95% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 127 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 128 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 130 1 0 1 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 131 7 3 4 0 0 0 100.00% 42.86% 57.14% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 132 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 133 5 5 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 134 4 4 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 135 59 26 33 0 0 0 100.00% 44.07% 55.93% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 136 25 18 7 0 0 0 100.00% 72.00% 28.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Water block 199H 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Block Group 1 500 144 355 1 0 0 100.00% 28.80% 71.00% 0.20% 0.00% 0.00% Total Tract 9579 500 144 355 1 0 0 100.00% 28.80% 71.00% 0.20% 0.00% 0.00% Total WINN/ZIMCO 580 168 411 1 0 0 100.00% 28.97% 70.86% 0.17% 0.00% 0.00% GROVE HILL/WHATLEY/GREENWOOD/HELL W 3,835 2,408 1,421 3 3 0 100.00% 62.79% 37.05% 0.08% 0.08% 0.00% GROVE HILL CITY HALL 1,551 976 560 7 8 0 100.00% 62.93% 36.11% 0.45% 0.52% 0.00% NEW PROSPECT/CHILTON 274 274 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% LIBERTY 269 256 13 0 0 0 100.00% 95.17% 4.83% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% BASNI 403 338 61 0 1 3 100.00% 83.87% 15.14% 0.00% 0.25% 0.74% THOMASVILLE 5,859 3,787 2,056 9 7 0 100.00% 64.64% 35.09% 0.15% 0.12% 0.00% Total Clarke County 24,123 14,145 9,895 44 31 8 100.00% 58.64% 41.02% 0.18% 0.13% 0.03% Escambia County 35,518 24,326 10,046 1,047 58 41 100.00% 68.49% 28.28% 2.95% 0.16% 0.12% Mobile County 378,643 254,853 117,872 1,940 3,398 580 100.00% 67.31% 31.13% 0.51% 0.90% 0.15% Monroe County 23,968 14,320 9,372 215 54 7 100.00% 59.75% 39.10% 0.90% 0.23% 0.03% Washington County 16,694 10,984 4,623 1,068 14 5 100.00% 65.80% 27.69% 6.40% 0.08% 0.03% Total District 1 577,226 403,193 164,448 4,944 3,776 865 100.00% 69.85% 28.49% 0.86% 0.65% 0.15% DB: ALABAMA Units Assigned to a District Date: 1/21/92 Plan:REDISTRICT District 2 Time: 3:16 p.m. Total Populations, All Ages Page: 6 Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS Census Total Total Total Total Total Total Unit Pop. White Black Am.Ind. Asian/PI Other ---- ---- ----- ----- ------- -------- ----- Autauga County 34,222 27,144 6,845 71 120 42 100.00% 79.32% 20.00% 0.21% 0.35% 0.12% Barbour County 25,417 14,118 11,194 46 44 15 100.00% 55.55% 44.04% 0.18% 0.17% 0.06% Bullock County 11,042 3,036 7,986 8 10 2 100.00% 27.50% 72.32% 0.07% 0.09% 0.02% Butler County 21,892 13,049 8,798 24 19 2 100.00% 59.61% 40.19% 0.11% 0.09% 0.01% Coffee County 40,240 32,702 6,917 163 317 141 100.00% 81.27% 17.19% 0.41% 0.79% 0.35% Conecuh County 14,054 8,063 5,925 43 13 10 100.00% 57.37% 42.16% 0.31% 0.09% 0.07% Covington County 36,478 31,551 4,777 72 48 30 100.00% 86.49% 13.10% 0.20% 0.13% 0.08% Crenshaw County 13,635 10,048 3,544 27 11 5 100.00% 73.69% 25.99% 0.20% 0.08% 0.04% Dale County 49,633 39,365 8,847 239 731 451 100.00% 79.31% 17.82% 0.48% 1.47% 0.91% Elmore County 49,210 37,850 11,039 137 129 55 100.00% 76.92% 22.43% 0.28% 0.26% 0.11% Geneva County 23,647 20,682 2,824 93 15 33 100.00% 87.46% 11.94% 0.39% 0.06% 0.14% Henry County 15,374 9,918 5,395 31 6 24 100.00% 64.51% 35.09% 0.20% 0.04% 0.16% Houston County 81,331 61,513 18,954 287 470 107 100.00% 75.63% 23.30% 0.35% 0.58% 0.13% Montgomery County CLOVERDALE COMMUNITY CENTER 7,177 6,644 489 13 25 6 100.00% 92.57% 6.81% 0.18% 0.35% 0.08% NORMANDALE LIBRARY Tract 0020 Block Group 3 Block 301 30 30 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 302 48 42 6 0 0 0 100.00% 87.50% 12.50% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 303 103 103 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 304 47 47 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 305 56 48 8 0 0 0 100.00% 85.71% 14.29% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 306 89 88 0 0 0 1 100.00% 98.88% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1.12% Block 307 40 40 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 308 96 81 13 0 2 0 100.00% 84.38% 13.54% 0.00% 2.08% 0.00% Block 309 33 32 0 0 1 0 100.00% 96.97% 0.00% 0.00% 3.03% 0.00% Block 310 46 43 3 0 0 0 100.00% 93.48% 6.52% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 311 281 269 3 0 9 0 100.00% 95.73% 1.07% 0.00% 3.20% 0.00% Block 313 46 46 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 314 44 44 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 315 266 153 107 0 6 0 100.00% 57.52% 40.23% 0.00% 2.26% 0.00% Total Block Group 3 1,225 1,066 140 0 18 1 100.00% 87.02% 11.43% 0.00% 1.47% 0.08% Total Tract 0020 1,225 1,066 140 0 18 1 100.00% 87.02% 11.43% 0.00% 1.47% 0.08% Tract 0021 Block Group 1 Block 101 60 60 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 102 38 38 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 103 34 34 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 104 12 12 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 105 42 42 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 106 40 40 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 107 21 21 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 108 37 37 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 109 23 23 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 110 19 19 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 111 29 29 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 112 19 19 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 113 17 17 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 114 19 15 4 0 0 0 100.00% 78.95% 21.05% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 115 55 52 3 0 0 0 100.00% 94.55% 5.45% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 116 54 54 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 117 28 28 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 118 50 50 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 119 59 58 1 0 0 0 100.00% 98.31% 1.69% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 120 58 54 4 0 0 0 100.00% 93.10% 6.90% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Block Group 1 714 702 12 0 0 0 100.00% 98.32% 1.68% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block Group 2 Block 201 7 6 1 0 0 0 100.00% 85.71% 14.29% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 202 16 16 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 203 44 43 1 0 0 0 100.00% 97.73% 2.27% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 204 63 48 15 0 0 0 100.00% 76.19% 23.81% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 205 36 34 2 0 0 0 100.00% 94.44% 5.56% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 206 91 58 33 0 0 0 100.00% 63.74% 36.26% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 207 70 56 14 0 0 0 100.00% 80.00% 20.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 208 52 52 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 209 68 63 5 0 0 0 100.00% 92.65% 7.35% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 210 85 72 13 0 0 0 100.00% 84.71% 15.29% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 211 73 63 10 0 0 0 100.00% 86.30% 13.70% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 212 52 52 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 213 35 33 2 0 0 0 100.00% 94.29% 5.71% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 214 74 59 15 0 0 0 100.00% 79.73% 20.27% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 215 76 59 17 0 0 0 100.00% 77.63% 22.37% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 216 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Block Group 2 842 714 128 0 0 0 100.00% 84.80% 15.20% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block Group 3 Block 301 32 20 12 0 0 0 100.00% 62.50% 37.50% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 302 64 39 24 0 1 0 100.00% 60.94% 37.50% 0.00% 1.56% 0.00% Block 303 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 308 51 42 8 0 1 0 100.00% 82.35% 15.69% 0.00% 1.96% 0.00% Block 310 24 22 2 0 0 0 100.00% 91.67% 8.33% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 311 77 62 15 0 0 0 100.00% 80.52% 19.48% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 312 37 29 8 0 0 0 100.00% 78.38% 21.62% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 313 22 19 3 0 0 0 100.00% 86.36% 13.64% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 314 98 68 26 0 4 0 100.00% 69.39% 26.53% 0.00% 4.08% 0.00% Block 315 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 316 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 317 43 35 8 0 0 0 100.00% 81.40% 18.60% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 318 63 57 6 0 0 0 100.00% 90.48% 9.52% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 319 51 36 15 0 0 0 100.00% 70.59% 29.41% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Block Group 3 562 429 127 0 6 0 100.00% 76.33% 22.60% 0.00% 1.07% 0.00% Block Group 4 Block 401 102 68 34 0 0 0 100.00% 66.67% 33.33% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 402 64 62 2 0 0 0 100.00% 96.88% 3.13% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 403 56 56 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 404 55 52 3 0 0 0 100.00% 94.55% 5.45% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 405 29 29 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 406 30 30 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 407 72 52 19 1 0 0 100.00% 72.22% 26.39% 1.39% 0.00% 0.00% Block 408 21 12 9 0 0 0 100.00% 57.14% 42.86% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 409 53 41 12 0 0 0 100.00% 77.36% 22.64% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 410 38 38 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 411 51 38 13 0 0 0 100.00% 74.51% 25.49% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 412 43 36 7 0 0 0 100.00% 83.72% 16.28% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 413 36 15 21 0 0 0 100.00% 41.67% 58.33% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 414 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 415 26 17 9 0 0 0 100.00% 65.38% 34.62% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 416 26 24 2 0 0 0 100.00% 92.31% 7.69% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 417 54 27 27 0 0 0 100.00% 50.00% 50.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 418 89 74 13 0 0 2 100.00% 83.15% 14.61% 0.00% 0.00% 2.25% Block 419 66 62 4 0 0 0 100.00% 93.94% 6.06% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 420 47 47 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 421 62 51 11 0 0 0 100.00% 82.26% 17.74% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 422 5 5 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 423 47 30 17 0 0 0 100.00% 63.83% 36.17% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 424 76 43 33 0 0 0 100.00% 56.58% 43.42% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 425 44 40 4 0 0 0 100.00% 90.91% 9.09% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 426 57 33 24 0 0 0 100.00% 57.89% 42.11% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Block Group 4 1,249 982 264 1 0 2 100.00% 78.62% 21.14% 0.08% 0.00% 0.16% Total Tract 0021 3,367 2,827 531 1 6 2 100.00% 83.96% 15.77% 0.03% 0.18% 0.06% Tract 0022 Block Group 1 Block 101 150 27 122 1 0 0 100.00% 18.00% 81.33% 0.67% 0.00% 0.00% Block 102 176 62 114 0 0 0 100.00% 35.23% 64.77% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 103 32 24 8 0 0 0 100.00% 75.00% 25.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 104 61 36 25 0 0 0 100.00% 59.02% 40.98% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 105 61 21 40 0 0 0 100.00% 34.43% 65.57% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 106 78 20 58 0 0 0 100.00% 25.64% 74.36% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 107 91 45 46 0 0 0 100.00% 49.45% 50.55% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 108 33 7 26 0 0 0 100.00% 21.21% 78.79% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 109 48 25 23 0 0 0 100.00% 52.08% 47.92% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 110 53 24 29 0 0 0 100.00% 45.28% 54.72% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 111 98 51 46 1 0 0 100.00% 52.04% 46.94% 1.02% 0.00% 0.00% Total Block Group 1 881 342 537 2 0 0 100.00% 38.82% 60.95% 0.23% 0.00% 0.00% Block Group 2 Block 201 75 36 39 0 0 0 100.00% 48.00% 52.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 202 40 13 27 0 0 0 100.00% 32.50% 67.50% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 203 56 32 24 0 0 0 100.00% 57.14% 42.86% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 204 474 24 450 0 0 0 100.00% 5.06% 94.94% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Block Group 2 645 105 540 0 0 0 100.00% 16.28% 83.72% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block Group 3 Block 304 50 27 21 0 2 0 100.00% 54.00% 42.00% 0.00% 4.00% 0.00% Block 305 13 0 11 2 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 84.62% 15.38% 0.00% 0.00% Block 306 46 9 36 0 1 0 100.00% 19.57% 78.26% 0.00% 2.17% 0.00% Block 310 59 23 35 0 1 0 100.00% 38.98% 59.32% 0.00% 1.69% 0.00% Block 312 480 224 255 0 1 0 100.00% 46.67% 53.13% 0.00% 0.21% 0.00% Block 313 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Block Group 3 648 283 358 2 5 0 100.00% 43.67% 55.25% 0.31% 0.77% 0.00% Total Tract 0022 2,174 730 1,435 4 5 0 100.00% 33.58% 66.01% 0.18% 0.23% 0.00% Total NORMANDALE LIBRARY 6,766 4,623 2,106 5 29 3 100.00% 68.33% 31.13% 0.07% 0.43% 0.04% HIGHLAND AVE ELEMENTARY 2,399 2,221 160 1 10 7 100.00% 92.58% 6.67% 0.04% 0.42% 0.29% VAUGHN ROAD ELEMENTARY 8,051 7,524 417 22 79 9 100.00% 93.45% 5.18% 0.27% 0.98% 0.11% SOUTHEAST YMCA 5,843 5,660 151 2 28 2 100.00% 96.87% 2.58% 0.03% 0.48% 0.03% ALDERSGATE UNITED METHODIST 6,572 5,733 711 14 97 17 100.00% 87.23% 10.82% 0.21% 1.48% 0.26% JOHN PATTERSON TRADE SCHOOL 7,780 3,614 4,066 7 81 12 100.00% 46.45% 52.26% 0.09% 1.04% 0.15% PETERSON ELEMENTARY 4,217 2,172 1,888 12 64 81 100.00% 51.51% 44.77% 0.28% 1.52% 1.92% CAPITOL HEIGHTS COMMUNITY CENTER 7,012 5,577 1,295 28 99 13 100.00% 79.54% 18.47% 0.40% 1.41% 0.19% HIGHLAND GARDENS COMMUNITY CENTER 5,337 4,945 305 32 46 9 100.00% 92.66% 5.71% 0.60% 0.86% 0.17% LIBRARY-COLISEUM BRANCH 4,424 4,324 58 9 33 0 100.00% 97.74% 1.31% 0.20% 0.75% 0.00% LAGOON PARK FIRE STATION 7,181 6,584 445 17 107 28 100.00% 91.69% 6.20% 0.24% 1.49% 0.39% FLOWERS ELEMENTARY 6,575 6,215 331 12 13 4 100.00% 94.52% 5.03% 0.18% 0.20% 0.06% GOODWYN COMMUNITY CENTER 6,085 5,844 172 7 51 11 100.00% 96.04% 2.83% 0.12% 0.84% 0.18% ALCAZAR SHRINE TEMPLE 3,262 2,535 667 2 47 11 100.00% 77.71% 20.45% 0.06% 1.44% 0.34% WARES FERRY ROAD ELEMENTARY 3,175 2,596 502 10 57 10 100.00% 81.76% 15.81% 0.31% 1.80% 0.31% JIM WALTERS HOMES 1,597 1,017 558 10 2 10 100.00% 63.68% 34.94% 0.63% 0.13% 0.63% SETH JOHNSON ELEMENTARY 6,109 4,489 1,500 13 74 33 100.00% 73.48% 24.55% 0.21% 1.21% 0.54% PETER CRUMP ELEMENTARY 3,899 2,125 1,712 12 44 6 100.00% 54.50% 43.91% 0.31% 1.13% 0.15% PINEDALE COMMUNITY CENTER 8,212 4,525 3,625 11 37 14 100.00% 55.10% 44.14% 0.13% 0.45% 0.17% AUBURN UNIVERSITY AT MONTGOMERY 6,135 5,151 793 7 169 15 100.00% 83.96% 12.93% 0.11% 2.75% 0.24% WOODMERE INFORMATION CENTER 4,986 4,502 367 21 83 13 100.00% 90.29% 7.36% 0.42% 1.66% 0.26% EASTDALE BAPTIST CHURCH 2,540 2,199 249 8 67 17 100.00% 86.57% 9.80% 0.31% 2.64% 0.67% GEORG WASHINGTON JUNIOR HIGH 3,942 1,339 2,564 19 18 2 100.00% 33.97% 65.04% 0.48% 0.46% 0.05% PIKE ROAD LIBRARY 852 510 342 0 0 0 100.00% 59.86% 40.14% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% CHESSER COMMUNITY CENTER 1,340 946 388 6 0 0 100.00% 70.60% 28.96% 0.45% 0.00% 0.00% ALABAMA NATIONAL BANK-RAMER Tract 0058 Block Group 2 Block 205 4 3 1 0 0 0 100.00% 75.00% 25.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Block Group 2 4 3 1 0 0 0 100.00% 75.00% 25.00% 0. 00% 0.00% 0.00% Block Group 3 Block 323 9 9 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Block Group 3 9 9 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Tract 0058 13 12 1 0 0 0 100.00% 92.31% 7.69% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total ALABAMA NATIONAL BANK-RAMER 13 12 1 0 0 0 100.00% 92.31% 7.69% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% COUNTY BRIDGE MAINTENANCE 1,080 647 433 0 0 0 100.00% 59.91% 40.09% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% SIKES KOHN COUNTRY MALL 896 513 377 5 1 0 100.00% 57.25% 42.08% 0.56% 0.11% 0.00% Total Montgomery County 133,457 104,786 26,672 305 1,361 333 100.00% 78.52% 19.99% 0.23% 1.02% 0.25% Pike County 27,595 17,814 9,548 146 68 19 100.00% 64.56% 34.60% 0.53% 0.25% 0.07% Total District 2 577,227 431,639 139,265 1,692 3,362 1,269 100.00% 74.78% 24.13% 0.29% 0.58% 0.22% DB: ALABAMA Units Assigned to a District Date: 1/21/92 Plan:REDISTRICT District 3 Time: 3:16 p.m. Total Populations, All Ages Page: 15 Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS Census Total Total Total Total Total Total Unit Pop. White Black Am.Ind. Asian/PI Other ---- ---- ----- ----- ------- -------- ----- Bibb County GREENPOND 1,980 1,907 66 3 0 4 100.00% 96.31% 3.33% 0.15% 0.00% 0.20% CEDAR GROVE 802 699 98 4 1 0 100.00% 87.16% 12.22% 0.50% 0.12% 0.00% PONDVILLE 489 430 58 1 0 0 100.00% 87.93% 11.86% 0.20% 0.00% 0.00% BRENT-SOUTH 3,064 1,589 1,467 2 0 6 100.00% 51.86% 47.88% 0.07% 0.00% 0.20% CENTREVILLE 2,116 1,681 433 1 1 0 100.00% 79.44% 20.46% 0.05% 0.05% 0.00% RANDOLPH 784 650 134 0 0 0 100.00% 82.91% 17.09% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% RIVERBEND 288 288 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 WEST BLOCKTON-WEST Tract 9513 Block Group 3 Block 306B 77 66 11 0 0 0 100.00% 85.71% 14.29% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 308D 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 327 33 7 26 0 0 0 100.00% 21.21% 78.79% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 328 9 9 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 329 1 0 1 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 330 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 331 6 1 5 0 0 0 100.00% 16.67% 83.33% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 332 7 0 7 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 333 2 0 2 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 334B 158 153 5 0 0 0 100.00% 96.84% 3.16% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00 Block 337 5 5 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 338 39 39 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 339 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 340 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 341 20 20 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 342 9 9 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 343 53 53 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Water block 399D 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 399E 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 399F 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 399G 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 399H 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 399J 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Block Group 3 512 451 60 0 1 0 100.00% 88.09% 11.72% 0.00% 0.20% 0.00% Block Group 4 Block 408A 2 2 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 408B 47 47 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 409 35 35 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 410 54 54 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 411 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 412 2 2 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 413A 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 413B 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 414 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 423 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 424 9 9 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 429 1 1 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 430 1 1 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 431 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 499B 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 499R 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 499T 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 499U 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 499V 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Block Group 4 151 151 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block Group 5 Block 520 66 36 30 0 0 0 100.00% 54.55% 45.45% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 521 46 40 6 0 0 0 100.00% 86.96% 13.04% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 522A 28 28 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 522B 102 59 43 0 0 0 100.00% 57.84% 42.16% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 523 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 524 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 525 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 526 10 9 0 1 0 0 100.00% 90.00% 0.00% 10.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 527 40 40 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block528 82 82 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 529 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 549 14 14 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 550 21 21 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 551 19 19 0 0 .0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Water block 599J 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 599K 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Block Group 5 428 348 79 1 0 0 100.00% 81.31% 18.46% 0.23% 0.00% 0.00% Total Tract 9513 1,091 950 139 1 1 0 100.00% 87.08% 12.74% 0.09% 0.09% 0.00 Total WEST BLOCKTON-WEST 1,091 950 139 1 1 0 100.00% 87.08% 12.74% 0.09% 0.09% 0.00% EOLINE 616 523 93 0 0 0 100.00% 84.90% 15.10% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% BRENT-NORTH 1,224 1,065 152 0 7 0 100.00% 87.01% 12.42% 0.00% 0.57% 0.00% HARRISBURG 410 207 203 0 0 0 100.00% 50.49% 49.51% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% TABERNACLE 193 189 4 0 0 0 100.00% 97.93% 2.07% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Bibb County 13,057 10,178 2,847 12 10 10 100.00% 77.95% 21.80% 0.09% 0.08% 0.08% Calhoun County 116,034 92,873 21,578 296 869 418 100.00% 80.04% 18.60% 0.26% 0.75% 0.36% Chambers County 36,876 23,575 13,221 41 13 26 100.00% 63.93% 35.85% 0.11% 0.04% 0.07% Chilton County 32,458 28,647 3,674 63 38 36 100.00% 88,26% 11.32% 0.19% 0.12% 0.11% Clay County 13,252 11,044 2,166 23 13 6 100.00% 83.34% 16.34% 0.17% 0.10% 0.05% Cleburne County 12,730 12,084 587 20 13 26 100.00% 94.93% 4.61% 0.16% 0.10% 0.20% Coosa County 11,063 7,242 3,782 34 4 1 100.00% 65.46% 34.19% 0.31% 0.04% 0.01% Lee County 87,146 64,889 20,407 132 1,584 134 100.00% 74.46% 23.42% 0.15% 1.82% 0.15% Macon County 24,928 3.443 21,340 24 99 22 100.00% 13.81% 85.61% 0.10% 0.40% 0.09% Randolph County 19,881 15,138 4,686 29 21 7 100.00% 76.14% 23.57% 0.15% 0.11% 0.04% Russell County 46,860 28,473 18,088 90 117 92 100.00% 60.76% 38.60% 0.19% 0.25% 0.20% St. Clair County 50,009 45,138 4,561 136 77 97 100.00% 90.26% 9.12% 0.27% 0.15% 0.19% Talladega County 74,107 50,970 22,773 174 113 77 100.00% 68.78% 30.73% 0.23% 0.15% 0.10% Tallapoosa County 38,826 28,493 10,212 62 37 22 100.00% 73.39% 26.30% 0.16% 0.10% 0.06% Total District 3 577,227 422,187 149,922 1,136 3,008 974 100.00% 73.14% 25.97% 0.20% 0.52% 0.17% DB: ALABAMA Units Assigned to a District Date: 1/21/92 Plan:REDISTRICT District 4 Time: 3:16 p.m. Total Populations, All Ages Page: 20 Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS Census Total Total Total Total Total Total Unit Pop. White Black Am.Ind. Asian/PI Other ---- ---- ----- ----- ------- -------- ----- Blount County 39,248 38,397 521 133 33 164 100.00% 97.83% 1.33% 0.34% 0.08% 0.42% Cherokee County 19,453 18,154 1,291 51 24 23 100.00% 92.89% 6.61% 0.26% 0.12% 0.12% Cullman County 67,613 66,744 560 134 117 58 100.00% 98.71% 0.83% 0.20% 0.17% 0.09% DeKalb County 54,651 52,980 1,028 481 77 85 100.00% 96.94% 1.88% 0.88% 0.14% 0.16% Etowah County 99,840 85,274 13,799 250 419 98 100.00% 85.41% 13.82% 0.25% 0.42% 0.10% Fayette County 17,962 15,717 2,190 9 19 27 100.00% 87.50% 12.19% 0.05% 0.11% 0.15% Franklin County 27,814 26,463 1,249 57 35 10 100.00% 95.14% 4.49% 0.20% 0.13% 0.04% Lamar County 15,715 13,805 1,862 24 10 14 100.00% 87.85% 11.85% 0.15% 0.06% 0.09% Lawrence County CITY HALL PRECINCT 1 BOX 1 Tract 9791 Block Group 1 Block 109 16 13 3 0 0 0 100.00% 81.25% 18.75% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 110A 23 1 22 0 0 0 100.00% 4.35% 95.65% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 110B 62 2 58 2 0 0 100.00% 3.23% 93.55% 3.23% 0.00% 0.00% Block 111A 79 2 77 0 0 0 100.00% 2.53% 97.47% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 111B 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 111C 18 6 12 0 0 0 100.00% 33.33% 66.67% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 111D 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 112A 11 0 11 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 112B 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 113 50 0 46 4 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 92.00% 8.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 114A 107 18 89 0 0 0 100.00% 16.82% 83.18% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 114B 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 115A 21 0 21 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 115B 26 0 26 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 116 48 0 48 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 117 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 118A 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 118B 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 119 45 42 0 2 0 1 100.00% 93.33% 0.00% 4.44% 0.00% 2.22% Block 120 1 1 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 121 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 122 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 123 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 124 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 125 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 132 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 133 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 134 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 135 30 25 5 0 0 0 100.00% 83.33% 16.67% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 136A 47 5 38 4 0 0 100.00% 10.64% 80.85% 8.51% 0.00% 0.00% Block 136B 25 7 18 0 0 0 100.00% 28.00% 72.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 137 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 138 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 139 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 152 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 153 13 13 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 154 22 17 5 0 0 0 100.00% 77.27% 22.73% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 155 35 35 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 156A 97 6 91 0 0 0 100.00% 61.19% 93.81% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 156B 56 2 54 0 0 0 100.00% 3.57% 96.43% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 157 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 158 12 12 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 159 11 11 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 160 16 11 1 4 0 0 100.00% 68.75% 6.25% 25.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 161 29 8 21 0 0 0 100.00% 27.59% 72.41% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 162 28 9 19 0 0 0 100.00% 32.14% 67.86% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 163 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 164 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 165A 8 0 8 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 165B 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 166 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 167 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 168 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 169 3 3 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 170 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 173 36 25 10 1 0 0 100.00% 69.44% 27.78% 2.78% 0.00% 0.00% Block 174 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 175 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 176 38 14 20 4 0 0 100.00% 36.84% 52.63% 10.53% 0.00% 0.00% Block 177 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 178 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 179 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 181 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 182 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 189 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Group 1 1,013 288 703 21 0 1 100.00% 28.43% 69.40% 2.07% 0.00% 0.10% Block Group 2 Block 201 18 10 2 6 0 0 100.00% 55.56% 11.11% 33.33% 0.00% 0.00% Block 202 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 203 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 210 36 36 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 211 32 29 0 3 0 0 100.00% 90.63% 0.00% 9.38% 0.00% 0.00% Block 212 41 41 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 213 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 214 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 215 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 216 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 217 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 218 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 219 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 220 6 6 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 221 19 0 19 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 223 53 2 51 0 0 0 100.00% 3.77% 96.23% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 224 3 3 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 227 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 228 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 229 22 0 22 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 230 26 0 24 2 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 92.31% 7.69% 0.00% 0.00% Block 231 3 0 3 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 232 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 233 29 20 7 2 0 0 100.00% 68.97% 24.14% 6.90% 0.00% 0.00% Block 236 4 4 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 237 19 0 19 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 238 30 0 30 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 239 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 240 14 5 9 0 0 0 100.00% 35.71% 64.29% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 241 2 2 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 242 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 243 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 244 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 245 63 61 2 0 0 0 100.00% 96.83% 3.17% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 246 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 247 15 13 2 0 0 0 100.00% 86.67% 13.33% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 252 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 273 5 5 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 274 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 275 11 11 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 276 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 277 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 278 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 279 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 280 1 0 1 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 281 2 2 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 282 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 283 12 1 11 0 0 0 100.00% 8.33% 91.67% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 284 3 3 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Water block 299A 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 299B 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 299C 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 299D 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 299E 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 299F 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Block Group 2 469 254 202 13 0 0 100.00% 54.16% 43.07% 2.77% 0.00% 0.00% Total Tract 9791 1,482 542 905 34 0 1 100.00% 36.57% 61.07% 2.29% 0.00% 0.07% Total CITY HALL PRECINCT 1 BOX 1 1,482 542 905 34 0 1 100.00% 36.57% 61.07% 2.29% 0.00% 0.07% FISH POND CHURCH PCT 1 BX 2 426 214 186 26 0 0 100.00% 50.23% 43.66% 6.10% 0.00% 0.00% MASONIC HALL PCT 6 BX 1 978 730 208 39 1 0 100.00% 74.64% 21.27% 3.99% 0.10% 0.00% DONALD CHURCH PCT 7 BX 1 797 665 79 52 0 1 100.00% 83.44% 9.91% 6.52% 0.00% 0.13% FLAT ROCK COMMUNITY CENTER PCT 8 B 285 258 0 27 0 0 100.00% 90.53% 0.00% 9.47% 0.00% 0.00% MASONIC HALL PCT 8 BX 3 352 305 0 47 0 0 100.00% 86.65% 0.00% 13.35% 0.00% 0.00% MT HOPE HIGH SCHOOL PCT 9 BX 1 1,033 940 46 47 0 0 100.00% 91.00% 4.45% 4.55% 0.00% 0.00% TERRYS TIRE COMPANY PCT 9 BX 2 732 628 56 47 1 0 100.00% 85.79% 7.65% 6.42% 0.14% 0.00% FIRE STATION PCT 10 BX 1 2,019 1,862 7 148 1 1 100.00% 92.22% 0.35% 7.33% 0.05% 0.05% MORRIS CHAPEL CHURCH PCT 11 BX 1 2,212 2,026 4 180 1 1 100.00% 91.59% 0.18% 8.14% 0.05% 0.05% LANIER STORE PCT 11 BX 2 783 697 3 83 0 0 100.00% 89.02% 0.38% 10.60% 0.00% 0.00% MASONIC HALL PCT 12 BX 1 1,255 1,166 0 88 1 0 100.00% 92.91% 0.00% 7.01% 0.08% 0.00% FIRE STATION PCT 13 BX 1 1,490 1,321 0 169 0 0 100.00% 88.66% 0.00% 11.34% 0.00% 0.00% OLD MIDWAY STORE PCT 13 BX 1 630 588 0 42 0 0 100.00% 93.33% 0.00% 6.67% 0.00% 0.00% HOOPER BUILDING PCT 14 BX 2 404 355 27 22 0 0 100.00% 87.87% 6.68% 5.45% 0.00% 0.00% FELLOWSHIP HALL PCT 15 BX 1 1,035 972 7 55 1 0 100.00% 93.91% 0.68% 5.31% 0.10% 0.00% AYCOCK BUILDING PCT 16 BX 1 1,123 1,051 1 69 2 0 100.00% 93.59% 0.09% 6.14% 0.18% 0.00% OLD LIBERTY CHURCH PCT 17 BX 1 367 355 0 12 0 0 100.00% 96.73% 0.00% 3.27% 0.00% 0.00% FIRE STATION PCT 18 BX 1 836 731 12 93 0 0 100.00% 87.44% 1.44% 11.12% 0.00% 0.00% ARMORY PCT 19 BX 1 1,727 1,553 113 61 0 0 100.00% 89.92% 6.54% 3.53% 0.00% 0.00% FAIRFIELD CHURCH PCT 19 BX 2 152 128 0 21 3 0 100.00% 84.21% 0.00% 13.82% 1.97% 0.00% PLEASANT GROVE CHURCH PCT 20 BX 1 246 229 11 6 0 0 100.00% 93.09% 4.47% 2.44% 0.00% 0.00% TAB SCOTT BUILDING PCT 21 BX 1 863 578 209 76 0 0 100.00% 66.98% 24.22% 8.81% 0.00% 0.00% HIGH SCHOOL PCT 21 BX 2 795 638 9 147 1 0 100.00% 80.25% 1.13% 18.49% 0.13% 0.00% LINDSEY HALL CHURCH PCT 22 BX 1 94 91 0 3 0 0 100.00% 96.81% 0.00% 3.19% 0.00% 0.00% PINEY GROVE CHURCH PCT 22 BX 2 169 154 0 15 0 0 100.00% 91.12% 0.00% 8.88% 0.00% 0.00% GILLESPIE STORE PCT 23 BX 1 280 266 0 14 0 0 100.00% 95.00% 0.00% 5.00% 0.00% 0.00% PINHOOK COMMUNITY CENTER PCT 23 BX 252 200 11 41 0 0 100.00% 79.37% 4.37% 16.27% 0.00% 0.00% CITY HALL PCT 24 BX 1 515 460 0 54 1 0 100.00% 89.32% 0.00% 10.49% 0.19% 0.00% MT MORIAH CHURCH PCT 24 BX 2 330 290 12 28 0 0 100.00% 87.88% 3.64% 8.48% 0.00% 0.00% BOARD OF EDUCATION PCT 25 BX 1 2,409 1,996 218 193 0 2 100.00% 82.86% 9.05% 8.01% 0.00% 0.08% RUTHERFORD STORE PCT 25 BX 2 118 94 0 24 0 0 100.00% 79.66% 0.00% 20.34% 0.00% 0.00% FREEMAN TABERNACLE CHURCH PCT 25 B 310 24 284 2 0 0 100.00% 7.74% 91.61% 0.65% 0.00% 0.00% Total Lawrence County 26,499 22,107 2,408 1,965 13 6 100.00% 83.43% 9.09% 7.42% 0.05% 0.02% Marion County 29,830 28,759 967 57 35 12 100.00% 96.41% 3.24% 0.19% 0.12% 0.04% Marshall County 70,832 69,631 1,087 231 111 42 100.00% 97.92% 1.53% 0.33% 0.16% 0.06% Pickens County LIBERTY 483 281 202 0 0 0 100.00% 58.18% 41.82% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% REFORM 2,229 1,423 805 1 0 0 100.00% 63.84% 36.11% 0.04% 0.00% 0.00% ETHELSVILLE 742 612 130 0 0 0 100.00% 82.48% 17.52% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% MCSHAN 274 196 74 2 2 0 100.00% 71.53% 27.01% 0.73% 0.73% 0.00% PINE GROVE 91 84 7 0 0 0 100.00% 92.31% 7.69% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% CARROLLTON 116 104 12 0 0 0 100.00% 89.66% 10.34% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% ALICEVILLE 3,633 981 2,646 1 5 0 100.00% 27.00% 72.83% 0.03% 0.14% 0.00% PALMETTA 502 431 67 4 0 0 100.00% 85.86% 13.35% 0.80% 0.00% 0.00% FAIRVIEW 1,215 1,191 23 1 0 0 100.00% 98.02% 1.89% 0.08% 0.00% 0.00% REFORM 1,564 1,182 369 10 2 1 100.00% 75.58% 23.59% 0.64% 0.13% 0.06% HOLLY SPRINGS 94 83 11 0 0 0 100.00% 88.30% 11.70% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% GORDO 785 727 55 2 1 0 100.00% 92.61% 7.01% 0.25% 0.13% 0.00% CARROLLTON Tract 9879 Block Group 1 Block 108A 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 113 59 59 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 114 9 9 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 115 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 116 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 117 18 18 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 118 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 119 17 17 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 120A 43 43 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 120B 44 44 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 121A 14 9 5 0 0 0 100.00% 64.29% 35.71% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 121B 37 22 15 0 0 0 100.00% 59.46% 40.54% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 122 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 123 3 3 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 124A 156 115 40 1 0 0 100.00% 73.72% 25.64% 0.64% 0.00% 0.00% Block 127 3 3 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 128A 47 47 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 129 2 2 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 130 25 25 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 131 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 132 5 5 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 133 12 12 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 134 17 17 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 135 10 10 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 136 2 1 1 0 0 0 100.00% 50.00% 50.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 137 3 3 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 138 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 139 4 4 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 140 1 1 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 141 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 142 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 143 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 144A 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 145A 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 145B 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 147 4 4 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 148 79 20 59 0 0 0 100.00% 25.32% 74.68% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 149 3 3 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 199B 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 199C 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 199D 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 199E 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 199F 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 199G 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Block Group 1 617 496 120 1 0 0 100.00% 8.39% 19.45% 0.16% 0.00% 0.00% Block Group 2 Block 205A 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 206A 60 1 59 0 0 0 100.00% 1.67% 98.33% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 207 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 208 5 0 5 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 209 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 210 1 1 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 211 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 212 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 213 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 214 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 215 31 4 27 0 0 0 100.00% 12.90% 87.10% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 216 55 27 27 1 0 0 100.00% 49.09% 49.09% 1.82% 0.00% 0.00% Block 217 4 4 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 218 10 10 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 219 6 6 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 220 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 221 20 11 9 0 0 0 100.00% 55.00% 45.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 222 16 16 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 223 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 224 58 53 5 0 0 0 100.00% 91.38% 8.62% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 225A 38 19 19 0 0 0 100.00% 50.00% 50.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 226 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 227A 8 2 6 0 0 0 100.00% 25.00% 75.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 228 6 6 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 229A 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 229B 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 230 38 30 8 0 0 0 100.00% 78.95% 21.05% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 231 13 13 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 232 1 1 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 233A 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 233B 14 14 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 234A 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 234B 7 7 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 235 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 236 4 0 4 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 237 4 0 4 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 238 21 21 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 239 1 1 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 243 5 5 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 244 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 245 25 25 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 246 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 247 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 248A 68 63 5 0 0 0 100.00% 92.65% 7.35% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 248B 106 40 66 0 0 0 100.00% 37.74% 62.26% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 249 9 9 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 250 7 7 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 251 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 252 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 253 20 13 7 0 0 0 100.00% 65.00% 35.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 254 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 255 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 256 1 1 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 257 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 299A 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 299D 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 299E 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 299F 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Block Group 2 662 410 251 1 0 0 100.00% 61.93% 37.92% 0.15% 0.00% 0.00% Block Group 3 64 7 57 0 0 0 Block 301A 100.00% 10.94% 89.06% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 301B 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 302A 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 302B 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 303 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 304 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 305 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 306A 45 45 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 307 19 0 19 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 308 97 3 94 0 0 0 100.00% 3.09% 96.91% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 309 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 310 24 2 22 0 0 0 100.00% 8.33% 91.67% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 315 22 3 19 0 0 0 100.00% 13.64% 86.36% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 316 17 0 17 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 317 11 2 9 0 0 0 100.00% 18.18% 81.82% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 318 7 0 7 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 319 1 0 1 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 328A 201 40 158 0 3 0 100.00% 19.90% 78.61% 0.00% 1.49% 0.00% Block 328B 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 329 71 0 71 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Water block 399A 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 399B 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Block Group 3 579 102 474 0 3 0 100.00% 17.62% 81.87% 0.00% 0.52% 0.00% Block Group 4 Block 401 16 16 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 402 45 43 2 0 0 0 100.00% 95.56% 4.44% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 403 8 8 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 404 15 6 9 0 0 0 100.00% 40.00% 60.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 436 176 21 155 0 0 0 100.00% 11.93% 88.07% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 437 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 438 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 441 8 0 8 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 471 5 2 3 0 0 0 100.00% 40.00% 60.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 472 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 499B 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Block Group 4 273 96 177 0 0 0 100.00% 35.16% 64.84% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Tract 9879 2,131 1,104 1,022 2 3 0 100.00% 51.81% 47.96% 0.09% 0.14% 0.00% Total CARROLLTON 2,131 1,104 1,022 2 3 0 100.00% 51.81% 47.96% 0.09% 0.14% 0.00% SAPPS Tract 9879 Block Group 3 Block 326A 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 326B 57 4 53 0 0 0 100.00% 7.02% 92.98% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 327 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 399L 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Block Group 3 57 4 53 0 0 0 100.00% 7.02% 92.98% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Tract 9879 57 4 53 0 0 0 100.00% 7.02% 92.98% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Tract 9881 Block Group 1 Block 109 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Block Group 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Tract 9881 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total SAPPS 57 4 53 0 0 0 100.00% 7.02% 92.98% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% HOLLY SPRINGS 67 67 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% GORDO/KIRK 0540 2,500 1,682 814 0 4 0 100.00% 67.28% 32.56% 0.00% 0.16% 0.00% SPEEDS MILL 193 192 1 0 0 0 100.00% 99.48% 0.52% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% BENEVOLA/ALICEVILLE 0560 (PART) 128 66 62 0 0 0 100.00% 51.56% 48.44% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% ALICEVILLE 1,153 900 243 0 0 0 100.00% 78.06% 21.08% 0.00% 0.87% 0.00% Total Pickens County 17,957 11,310 6,596 23 27 1 100.00% 62.98% 36.73% 0.13% 0.15% 0.01% Walker County 67,670 63,042 4,405 84 107 32 100.00% 93.16% 6.51% 0.12% 0.16% 0.05% Winston County 22,053 21,925 57 42 26 3 100.00% 99.42% 0.26% 0.19% 0.12% 0.01% Total District 4 577,227 534,038 38,020 3,541 1,053 575 100.00% 92.52% 6.59% 0.61% 0.18% 0.10% DB: ALABAMA Units Assigned to a District Date: 1/21/92 Plan:REDISTRICT District 5 Time: 3:16 p.m. Total Populations, All Ages Page: 36 Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS Census Total Total Total Total Total Total Unit Pop. White Black Am.Ind. Asian/PI Other ---- ---- ----- ----- ------- -------- ----- Colbert County 51,666 42,820 8,568 137 93 48 100.00% 82.88% 16.58% 0.27% 0.18% 0.09% Jackson County 47,796 44,696 1,968 1,020 90 22 100.00% 93.51% 4.12% 2.13% 0.19% 0.05% Lauderdale County 79,661 71,560 7,695 165 196 45 100.00% 89.83% 9.66% 0.21% 0.25% 0.06% Lawrence County CITY HALL PRECINCT 1 BOX 1 Tract 9791 Block Group 2 Block 204 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 205 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 206 5 5 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 207 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 208 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 209 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 222 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 225 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 226 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Block Group 2 5 5 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Tract 9791 5 5 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total CITY HALL PRECINCT 1 BOX 1 5 5 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% SENIOR CITIZENS PCT 2 BX 1 1,462 231 1,221 10 0 0 100.00% 15.80% 83.52% 0.68% 0.00% 0.00% FIRE STATION PCT 3 BX 1 784 211 570 1 0 2 100.00% 26.91% 72.70% 0.13% 0.00% 0.26% WHEELER GROVE CHURCH PCT 4 BX 1 229 143 86 0 0 0 100.00% 62.45% 37.55% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% DEPOT PCT 5 BX 1 1,609 1,047 513 42 6 1 100.00% 65.07% 31.88% 2.61% 0.37% 0.06% WOLF SPRINGS CHURCH PCT 8 BX 1 925 819 0 106 0 0 100.00% 88.54% 0.00% 11.46% 0.00% 0.00% Total Lawrence County 5,014 2,456 2,390 159 6 3 100.00% 48.98% 47.67% 3.17% 0.12% 0.06% Limestone County 54,135 46,658 7,127 148 158 44 100.00% 86.19% 13.17% 0.27% 0.29% 0.08% Madison County 238,912 184,197 48,116 1,601 4,232 766 100.00% 77.10% 20.14% 0.67% 1.77% 0.32% Morgan County 100,043 89,122 10,081 310 370 160 100.00% 89.08% 10.08% 0.31% 0.37% 0.16% Total District 5 577,227 481,509 85,945 3,540 5,145 1,088 100.00% 83.42% 14.89% 0.61% 0.89% 0.19% DB: ALABAMA Units Assigned to a District Date: 1/21/92 Plan:REDISTRICT District 6 Time: 3:16 p.m. Total Populations, All Ages Page: 38 Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS Census Total Total Total Total Total Total Unit Pop. White Black Am.Ind. Asian/PI Other ---- ---- ----- ----- ------- -------- ----- Bibb County SIX MILE 578 572 5 0 1 0 100.00% 98.96% 0.87% 0.00% 0.17% 0.00% BRIERFIELD 848 537 311 0 0 0 100.00% 63.33% 36.67% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% WEST BLOCKTON-EAST 1,489 1,177 307 5 0 0 100.00% 79.05% 20.62% 0.34% 0.00% 0.00% WEST BLOCKTON-WEST Tract 9513 Block Group 3 Block 384 8 0 8 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 385 22 22 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Block Group 3 30 30 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block Group 4 Block 407 4 4 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Block Group 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Tract 9513 34 34 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total WEST BLOCKTON-WEST 34 34 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% MARVEL 180 172 8 0 0 0 100.00% 95.56% 4.44% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% GREY HILL 390 382 0 8 0 0 100.00% 97.95% 0.00% 2.05% 0.00% 0.00% Total Bibb County 3,519 2,874 631 13 1 0 100.00% 81.67% 17.93% 0.37% 0.03% 0.00% Jefferson County BURKETT CENTER FOR MULTI-IN 4,261 3,880 374 2 3 2 100.00% 91.06% 8.78% 0.05% 0.07% 0.05% FULTONDALE COMMUNITY CENTER 7,059 6,793 232 16 17 1 100.00% 96.23% 3.29% 0.23% 0.24% 0.01% GARDENDALE CIVIC CTR/4306 MORRIS M 13,034 12,820 170 28 10 6 100.00% 98.36% 1.30% 0.21% 0.08% 0.05% NEW CASTLE UNITED METHODIST 1,316 1,273 35 5 2 1 100.00% 96.73% 2.66% 0.38% 0.15% 0.08% KIMBERLY CITY HALL 1,668 1,603 63 2 0 0 100.00% 96.10% 3.78% 0.12% 0.00% 0.00% TRAFFORD CITY HALL 895 843 49 0 0 3 100.00% 94.19% 5.47% 0.00% 0.00% 0.34% KERMIT JOHNSON ELEM/PALMERDALE FIR 7,966 7,358 587 16 3 2 100.00% 92.37% 7.37% 0.20% 0.04% 0.03% CLAY COMMUNITY CTR/4313 GRAYSON VA 8,532 8,353 141 18 17 3 100.00% 97.90% 1.65% 0.21% 0.20% 0.04% PINSON UNITED METHODIST CHURCH/431 4,532 4,435 69 11 16 1 100.00% 97.86% 1.52% 0.24% 0.35% 0.02% CENTER POINT ELEMENTARY 8,469 7,611 796 9 37 16 100.00% 89.87% 9.40% 0.11% 0.44% 0.19% CENTER POINT COURTHOUSE 6,077 5,752 290 7 25 3 100.00% 94.65% 4.77% 0.12% 0.41% 0.05% CHALKVILLE CIVIC CENTER 6,627 6,369 237 7 11 3 100.00% 96.11% 3.58% 0.11% 0.17% 0.05% GRAYSON VALLEY SOUTHERN 6,779 6,583 152 21 21 2 100.00% 97.11% 2.24% 0.31% 0.31% 0.03% TRUSSVILLE CITY HALL 9,771 9,474 264 8 20 5 100.00% 96.96% 2.70% 0.08% 0.20% 0.05% ROBINSON SCHOOL 8,547 6,313 2,169 15 40 10 100.00% 73.86% 25.38% 0.18% 0.47% 0.12% DON HAWKINS COMM CTR 3,237 3,052 166 5 14 0 100.00% 94.28% 5.13% 0.15% 0.43% 0.00% HUFFMAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5,532 5,369 102 7 47 7 100.00% 97.05% 1.84% 0.13% 0.85% 0.13% NORTH ROEBUCK SCHOOL 4,102 3,878 171 20 26 7 100.00% 94.54% 4.17% 0.49% 0.63% 0.17% ANDREW GAVIN FAMILY LIFE 6,398 5,874 471 14 29 10 100.00% 91.81% 7.36% 0.22% 0.45% 0.16% LM SMITH SCHOOL 6,405 5,690 690 6 16 3 100.00% 88.84% 10.77% 0.09% 0.25% 0.05% FIRE STATION #28 8,207 7,195 951 8 42 11 100.00% 87.67% 11.59% 0.10% 0.51% 0.13% MOUNTAIN CHAPEL METHODIST 5,917 5,864 8 2 39 4 100.00% 99.10% 0.14% 0.03% 0.66% 0.07% VESTAVIA CITY HALL 3,599 3,544 19 0 35 1 100.00% 98.47% 0.53% 0.00% 0.97% 0.03% MOUNTAIN BROOK GRAMMAR SCHOOL 1,945 1,933 3 3 6 0 100.00% 99.38% 0.15% 0.15% 0.31% 0.00% LOCKSLEY FIRE STATION 4,558 4,521 6 4 27 0 100.00% 99.19% 0.13% 0.09% 0.59% 0.00% OVERTON ROAD METHODIST/4608 LEEDS 7,713 7,101 546 17 42 7 100.00% 92.07% 7.08% 0.22% 0.54% 0.09% MOUNTAIN BROOK JUNIOR HIGH 4,743 4,679 9 2 43 10 100.00% 98.65% 0.19% 0.04% 0.91% 0.21% CAHABA HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY 4,822 4,733 45 9 32 3 100.00% 98.15% 0.93% 0.19% 0.66% 0.06% BROOKWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH 4,837 4,747 28 2 58 2 100.00% 98.14% 0.58% 0.04% 1.20% 0.04% HIGHLAND RACQUET CLUB 1,398 1,289 90 4 13 2 100.00% 92.20% 6.44% 0.29% 0.93% 0.14 AVONDALE SCHOOL 2,320 2,283 28 3 4 2 100.00% 98.41% 1.21% 0.13% 0.17% 0.09% DONALD COMER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 3,365 2,885 446 5 26 3 100.00% 85.74% 13.25% 0.15% 0.77% 0.09% WOODLAWN FIRE STATION 3,565 2,215 1,323 2 15 10 100.00% 62.13% 37.11% 0.06% 0.42% 0.28% MOUNTAIN BROOK CITY HALL 3,669 3,657 5 1 6 0 100.00% 99.67% 0.14% 0.03% 0.16% 0.00% MCELWAIN BAPTIST CHURCH 5,858 5,445 332 7 72 2 100.00% 92.95% 5.67% 0.12% 1.23% 0.03% IRONDALE CITY HALL 8,945 7,177 1,632 23 98 15 100.00% 80.23% 18.24% 0.26% 1.10% 0.17% EAST JEFFERSON COUNTY FIRE STATION 1,877 1,523 345 6 2 1 100.00% 81.14% 18.38% 0.32% 0.11% 0.05% LEEDS ARMORY 4,553 3,385 1,145 8 1 14 100.00% 74.35% 25.15% 0.18% 0.02% 0.31% KNESSETH ISRAEL SYNAGOGUE 1,706 1,696 6 1 3 0 100.00% 99.41% 0.35% 0.06% 0.18% 0.00% 4801 4802 4803 4807 4808 PCTS COMB 26,396 24,878 1,036 41 385 56 100.00% 94.25% 3.92% 0.16% 1.46% 0.21% ST MARKS UNITED METHODIST 6,697 6,448 105 11 115 18 100.00% 96.28% 1.57% 0.16% 1.72% 0.27% VESTAVIA PLAZA MALL-SEARS 1,195 1,172 8 1 14 0 100.00% 98.08% 0.67% 0.08% 1.17% 0.00% VESTAVIA HIGH SCHOOL 6,317 5,997 191 3 107 19 100.00% 94.93% 3.02% 0.05% 1.69% 0.30% PLEASANT GROVE COMMUNITY 8,579 8,377 177 15 6 4 100.00% 97.65% 2.06% 0.17% 0.07% 0.05% HUEYTOWN ALTERNATIVE SCHOOL 6,746 4,299 2,423 8 16 0 100.00% 63.73% 35.92% 0.12% 0.24% 0.00% SYLVAN SPRINGS COMMUNITY 1,695 1,682 7 5 0 1 100.00% 99.23% 0.41% 0.29% 0.00% 0.06% MAYTOWN CITY HALL 504 436 65 3 0 0 100.00% 86.51% 12.90% 0.60% 0.00% 0.00% BOOKER HEIGHTS COMMUNITY 197 12 185 0 0 0 100.00% 6.09% 93.91% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% EASTERN VALLEY COMMUNITY Tract 0142.03 Block Group 1 Block 124 107 107 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 125 18 18 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 128 51 50 0 0 1 0 100.00% 98.04% 0.00% 0.00% 1.96% 0.00% Block 131 38 38 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 148 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Block Group 1 214 213 0 0 1 0 100.00% 99.53% 0.00% 0.00% 0.47% 0.00% Block Group 2 Block 215 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 216 31 31 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 217 98 94 0 1 1 2 100.00% 95.92% 0.00% 1.02% 1.02% 2.04% Block 219 12 12 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 220 82 82 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 221 21 21 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Block Group 2 244 240 0 1 1 2 100.00% 98.36% 0.00% 0.41% 0.41% 0.82% Block Group 3 Block 304 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Block Group 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Tract 0142.03 458 453 0 1 2 2 100.00% 98.91% 0.00% 0.22% 0.44% 0.44% Total EASTERN VALLEY COMMUNITY 458 453 0 1 2 2 100.00% 98.91% 0.00% 0.22% 0.44% 0.44% WA BELL HIGH SCHOOL 1,142 873 266 3 0 0 100.00% 76.44% 23.29% 0.26% 0.00% 0.00% HUEYTOWN CITY HALL 7,013 6,887 111 3 10 2 100.00% 98.20% 1.58% 0.04% 0.14% 0.03% VIRGINIA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT 2,329 2,154 171 1 3 0 100.00% 92.49% 7.34% 0.04% 0.13% 0.00% JOHNS CITY HALL 1,600 1,254 329 12 0 5 100.00% 78.38% 20.56% 0.75% 0.00% 0.31% OAK GROVE HIGH SCHOOL 1,921 1,917 0 2 2 0 100.00% 99.79% 0.00% 0.10% 0.10% 0.00% CONCORD FIRE DEPARTMENT 4,680 4,640 17 11 9 3 100.00% 99.15% 0.36% 0.24% 0.19% 0.06% ALLIANCE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 3,710 2,779 918 7 1 5 100.00% 74.91% 24.74% 0.19% 0.03% 0.13% MASONIC LODGE WEST JEFFERSON 1,389 1,368 19 1 0 1 100.00% 98.49% 1.37% 0.07% 0.00% 0.07% ADAMSVILLE ELEMENTARY 4,474 3,895 567 9 1 2 100.00% 87.06% 12.67% 0.20% 0.02% 0.04% MULGA CITY HALL 1,692 1,276 415 1 0 0 100.00% 75.41% 24.53% 0.06% 0.00% 0.00% MINOR FIRE STATION 3,395 2,308 1,076 8 3 0 100.00% 67.98% 31.69% 0.24% 0.09% 0.00% SANDUSKY FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH 1,873 1,730 140 1 2 0 100.00% 92.37% 7.47% 0.05% 0.11% 0.00% WESTWOOD CRUMLEY CHAPEL CHURCH 4,595 4,192 380 7 11 5 100.00% 91.23% 8.27% 0.15% 0.24% 0.11% ADAMSVILLE CITY HALL 3,448 2,790 643 13 2 0 100.00% 80.92% 18.65% 0.38% 0.06% 0.00% MAURICE WEST COMMUNITY CENTER 3,203 2,497 698 2 5 1 100.00% 77.96% 21.79% 0.06% 0.16% 0.03% BROOKSIDE CITY HALL 2,963 2,790 169 3 1 0 100.00% 94.16% 5.70% 0.10% 0.03% 0.00% MT OLIVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 3,276 3,262 3 8 2 1 100.00% 99.57% 0.09% 0.24% 0.06% 0.03% WARRIOR CITY HALL 3,312 2,708 596 3 4 1 100.00% 81.76% 18.00% 0.09% 0.12% 0.03% CORNER SCHOOL 2,803 2,790 1 3 3 6 100.00% 99.54% 0.04% 0.11% 0.11% 0.21% BAGLEY JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 4,191 4,179 1 10 0 1 100.00% 99.71% 0.02% 0.24% 0.00% 0.02% NORTHWESTERN 852 842 9 0 1 0 100.00% 98.83% 1.06% 0.00% 0.12% 0.00% RAMSAY HIGH SCHOOL 3,844 2,194 1,168 12 455 15 100.00% 57.08% 30.39% 0.31% 11.84% 0.39% GLEN IRIS SCHOOL 7,412 5,479 1,599 12 297 25 100.00% 73.92% 21.57% 0.16% 4.01% 0.34% FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE 3,537 2,803 655 12 57 10 100.00% 79.25% 18.52% 0.34% 1.61% 0.28% HIGHLAND MANOR APARTMENTS 158 153 5 0 0 0 100.00% 96.84% 3.16% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% FIRE STATION 22 4,852 4,201 616 6 25 4 100.00% 86.58% 12.70% 0.12% 0.52% 0.08% PARKE MEMORIAL LIBRARY 758 679 68 4 5 2 100.00% 89.58% 8.97% 0.53% 0.66% 0.26% 5506 5507 5508 PCTS COMBINED 10,443 9,856 530 14 37 6 100.00% 94.38% 5.08% 0.13% 0.35% 0.06% HOMEWOOD RECREATION CENTER 4,700 3,615 957 13 102 13 100.00% 76.91% 20.36% 0.28% 2.17% 0.28% CARR AVENUE FIRE STATION 4,898 4,278 519 10 76 15 100.00% 87.34% 10.60% 0.20% 1.55% 0.31% EDGEWOOD SCHOOL 5,256 4,613 529 14 91 9 100.00% 87.77% 10.06% 0.27% 1.73% 0.17% HOMEWOOD LIBRARY 5,536 5,363 99 9 46 19 100.00% 96.88% 1.79% 0.16% 0.83% 0.34% SHADES CAHABA SCHOOL 3,446 3,370 42 6 28 0 100.00% 97.79% 1.22% 0.17% 0.81% 0.00% MORGAN ROAD FIRE STATION 3,557 3,511 41 2 2 1 100.00% 98.71% 1.15% 0.06% 0.06% 0.03% HIGHLAND AVENUE FIRE STATION 1,346 1,284 48 2 12 0 100.00% 95.39% 3.57% 0.15% 0.89% 0.00% HILLVIEW COMMUNITY CENTER 2,553 2,258 288 1 6 0 100.00% 88.44% 11.28% 0.04% 0.24% 0.00% HILLVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 3,265 1,950 1,301 0 14 0 100.00% 59.72% 39.85% 0.00% 0.43% 0.00% Total Jefferson County 393,010 355,687 33,386 637 2,876 424 100.00% 90.50% 8.49% 0.16% 0.73% 0.11% Shelby County 99,358 90,715 7,718 264 575 86 100.00% 91.30% 7.77% 0.27% 0.58% 0.09% Tuscaloosa County REGIONAL EDUCATION CENTER Tract 0104.04 Block Group 1 Block 101 4 4 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Block Group 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Tract 0104.04 4 4 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total REGIONAL EDUCATION CENTER 4 4 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% COUNTY COURTHOUSE 5,569 4,630 594 10 315 20 100.00% 83.14% 10.67% 0.18% 5.66% 0.36% CLARA VERNA TOWERS 6,211 4,678 1,360 11 141 21 100.00% 75.32% 21.90% 0.18% 2.27% 0.34% COLISEUM 4,262 3,402 722 6 123 9 100.00% 79.82% 16.94% 0.14% 2.89% 0.21% FOREST LAKE METHODIST CHURCH 3,109 2,756 312 6 34 1 100.00% 88.65% 10.04% 0.19% 1.09% 0.03% TUSCALOOSA ACADEMY/WOOD VILLAGE CO 7,720 6,915 686 1 110 8 100.00% 89.57% 8.89% 0.01% 1.42% 0.10% JAYCEE PARK 6,337 4,475 1,789 11 36 26 100.00% 70.62% 28.23% 0.17% 0.57% 0.41% HOLT ARMORY 4,878 3,045 1,818 6 5 4 100.00% 62.42% 37.27% 0.12% 0.10% 0.08% #6 FIRE STATION 4,879 4,371 474 5 21 8 100.00% 89.59% 9.72% 0.10% 0.43% 0.16% PETERSON CHURCH/BROOKWOOD CITY HAL 3,691 3,648 40 2 0 1 100.00% 98.84% 1.08% 0.05% 0.00% 0.03% WESTWOOD SCHOOL BUHL SCHOOL MASONI 3,266 2,887 337 7 0 35 100.00% 88.40% 10.32% 0.21% 0.00% 1.07% MYRTLEWOOD SCHOOL COMMUNITY CENTER 1,818 1,194 611 9 0 4 100.00% 65.68% 33.61% 0.50% 0.00% 0.22% BROWNVILLE COMMUNITY CENTER/MCCONN 590 586 4 0 0 0 100.00% 99.32% 0.68% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% OLD SAMANTHA SCHOOL SWINDLE 772 653 117 2 0 0 100.00% 84.59% 15.16% 0.26% 0.00% 0.00% MACEDONIA METHODIST CHURCH 3,825 3,650 157 7 9 2 100.00% 95.42% 4.10% 0.18% 0.24% 0.05% VOTING BUILDING/OLD HOPE SCHOOL SI 1,444 1,424 11 0 8 1 100.00% 98.61% 0.76% 0.00% 0.55% 0.07% GORGAS-SAMANTHA COMM CENTER/VOTING 1,521 1,454 50 17 0 0 100.00% 95.60% 3.29% 1.12% 0.00% 0.00% FRANK FIELDS STORE/DAN TIERCE/FILE 1,511 1,485 20 4 0 2 100.00% 98.28% 1.32% 0.26% 0.00% 0.13% ECHOLA/ELROD/BAMA JONES STORE 1,032 990 39 1 2 0 100.00% 95.93% 3.78% 0.10% 0.19% 0.00% MT OLIVE FIRE STATION 2,314 2,294 0 13 6 1 100.00% 99.14% 0.00% 0.56% 0.26% 0.04% CHAPEL HILL BAPTIST CHURCH 1,973 1,874 93 3 2 1 100.00% 94.98% 4.71% 0.15% 0.10% 0.05% NORTHPORT COMMUNITY CENTER 4,949 3,813 1,119 2 6 9 100.00% 77.05% 22.61% 0.04% 0.12% 0.18% NORTHPORT ARMORY/CITY HALL 9,664 8,273 1,221 17 138 15 100.00% 85.61% 12.63% 0.18% 1.43% 0.16% Total Tuscaloosa County 81,339 68,501 11,574 140 956 168 100.00% 84.22% 14.23% 0.17% 1.18% 0.21% Total District 6 577,226 517,777 53,309 1,054 4,408 678 100.00% 89.70% 9.24% 0.18% 0.76% 0.12% DB: ALABAMA Units Assigned to a District Date: 1/21/92 Plan:REDISTRICT District 7 Time: 3:16 p.m. Total Populations, All Ages Page: 46 Plan type: CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS Census Total Total Total Total Total Total Unit Pop. White Black Am.Ind. Asian/PI Other ---- ---- ----- ----- ------- -------- ----- Choctaw County 16,018 8,913 7,077 10 12 6 100.00% 55.64% 44.18% 0.06% 0.07% 0.04% Clarke County GOSPORT 359 45 312 0 2 0 100.00% 12.53% 86.91% 0.00% 0.56% 0.00% SALITPA Tract 9579 Block Group 1 Block 120 10 10 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Block Group 1 10 10 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Tract 9579 10 10 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total SALITPA 10 10 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% WINN/ZIMCO Tract 9579 Block Group 1 Block 129 4 4 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Block Group 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Tract 9579 4 4 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total WINN/ZIMCO 4 4 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% ANDERSONS 600 224 375 0 1 0 100.00% 37.33% 62.50% 0.00% 0.17% 0.00% SCYRENE 1,421 888 531 1 1 0 100.00% 62.49% 37.37% 0.07% 0.07% 0.00% CHANCE 213 36 177 0 0 0 100.00% 16.90% 83.10% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% MORVIN/CAMPBELL 510 175 335 0 0 0 100.00% 34.31% 65.69% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Clarke County 3,117 1,382 1,730 1 4 0 100.00% 44.34% 55.50% 0.03% 0.13% 0.00% Dallas County 48,130 20,121 27,825 41 129 14 100.00% 41.81% 57.81% 0.09% 0.27% 0.03% Greene County 10,153 1,966 8,181 3 0 3 100.00% 19.36% 80.58% 0.03% 0.00% 0.03% Hale County 15,498 6,255 9,214 20 9 0 100.00% 40.36% 59.45% 0.13% 0.06% 0.00% Jefferson County BARRETT SCHOOL 3,780 1,461 2,290 5 21 3 100.00% 38.65% 60.58% 0.13% 0.56% 0.08% CHARLES BROWN SCHOOL 4,836 1,824 2,996 7 2 7 100.00% 37.72% 61.95% 0.14% 0.04% 0.14% ENSLEY COMMUNITY HOUSE 4,807 1,322 3,470 6 1 8 100.00% 27.50% 72.19% 0.12% 0.02% 0.17% WYLAM FIRE STATION 3,211 1,658 1,552 0 1 0 100.00% 51.64% 48.33% 0.00% 0.03% 0.00% FAIRFIELD HIGH CIVIC CLUB 2,828 2,422 385 5 16 0 100.00% 85.64% 13.61% 0.18% 0.57% 0.00% GLEN OAKS SCHOOL 5,129 1,803 3,312 2 7 5 100.00% 35.15% 64.57% 0.04% 0.14% 0.10% BESSEMER STATE TECHNICAL 3,053 2,518 526 0 8 1 100.00% 82.48% 17.23% 0.00% 0.26% 0.03% EASTERN VALLEY COMMUNITY Tract 0141.04 Block Group 1 Block 128 2 2 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 129 4 4 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total block Group 1 6 6 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Tract 0141.04 6 6 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Tract 0141.05 Block Group 2 Block 204B 43 43 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 204E 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 213A 15 15 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 213B 17 17 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 213C 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 213d 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 213E 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Block Group 2 75 75 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block Group 9 Block 901A 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 901B 53 50 3 0 0 0 100.00% 94.34% 5.66% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 902A 14 13 1 0 0 0 100.00% 92.86% 7.14% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 902B 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 902C 67 67 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 903A 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 903B 62 61 1 0 0 0 100.00% 98.39% 1.61% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 903C 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 903d 24 24 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 903E 11 11 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 904 13 13 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 905 3 3 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 906 16 16 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 907A 20 20 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 907B 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 907C 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 908 12 12 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Block Group 9 295 290 5 0 0 0 100.00% 98.31% 1.69% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Tract 0141.05 370 365 5 0 0 0 100.00% 98.65% 1.35% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Tract 0142.03 Block Group 1 Block 101 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 102 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 103 37 37 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 104 33 33 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 105 7 7 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 106 16 16 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 107 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 108 16 16 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 109 42 42 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 110 44 43 0 1 0 0 100.00% 97.73% 0.00% 2.27% 0.00% 0.00% Block 111 4 4 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 112 25 24 0 0 1 0 100.00% 96.00% 0.00% 0.00% 4.00% 0.00% Block 113 20 20 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 114 80 80 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 115 15 15 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 116 15 15 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 117 44 44 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 118 21 21 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 119 24 24 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 120 59 59 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 121 37 37 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 122 13 12 0 0 0 1 100.00% 92.31% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 7.69% Block 123 54 47 6 1 0 0 100.00% 87.04% 11.11% 1.85% 0.00% 0.00% Block 126 7 7 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 127 85 10 75 0 0 0 100.00% 11.76% 88.24% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 129 84 84 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 130 82 25 57 0 0 0 100.00% 30.49% 69.51% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 132 25 25 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 133 3 3 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 134 11 11 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 135 550 529 20 0 1 0 100.00% 96.18% 3.64% 0.00% 0.18% 0.00% Block 136 36 35 0 0 1 0 100.00% 97.22% 0.00% 0.00% 2.78% 0.00% Block 137 127 125 2 0 0 0 100.00% 98.43% 1.57% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 138A 12 12 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 138B 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 138C 13 13 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 138D 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 139A 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 139B 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 140 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 141 20 20 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 142 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 143 69 68 0 0 1 0 100.00% 98.55% 0.00% 0.00% 1.45% 0.00% Block 144 9 9 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 145 20 16 4 0 0 0 100.00% 80.00% 20.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 146 25 8 17 0 0 0 100.00% 32.00% 68.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 147 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 149 4 4 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 151 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 152 36 11 25 0 0 0 100.00% 30.56% 69.44% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Water block 199 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 199 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 199 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 199 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 199 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 199 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Block Group 1 1,824 1,611 206 2 4 1 100.00% 88.32% 11.29% 0.11% 0.22% 0.05% Block Group 2 Block 218 182 182 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 222 39 36 0 0 0 3 100.00% 92.31% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 7.69% Total Block Group 2 221 218 0 0 0 3 100.00% 98.64% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1.36% Block Group 3 Block 301 90 82 8 0 0 0 100.00% 91.11% 8.89% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 302 87 35 52 0 0 0 100.00% 40.23% 59.77% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 303 245 244 0 0 1 0 100.00% 99.59% 0.00% 0.00% 0.41% 0.00% Block 305 45 45 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 306 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 307 13 9 4 0 0 0 100.00% 69.23% 30.77% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 308 11 11 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 309 26 26 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 310 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 311 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 312 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 313 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 314 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 315 5 5 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 316 49 49 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 317 115 115 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 318 53 53 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 319 14 14 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 320 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 321 266 265 1 0 0 0 100.00% 99.62% 0.38% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 322 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 323 3 3 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 324 4 4 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 325 55 55 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 326 38 38 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 327 12 12 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 328 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 329 39 39 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 330 10 10 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 331 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 332 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 333 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 399A 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 399B 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 399C 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 399D 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 399E 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 399F 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 399G 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 399H 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 399J 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 399K 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 399L 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 399M 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 399N 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Block Group 3 1,180 1,114 65 0 1 0 100.00% 94.41% 5.51% 0.00% 0.08% 0.00% Block Group 9 Block 901A 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 901B 191 191 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 902 12 12 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 903 17 17 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 904 7 7 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 905 11 11 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 906 6 6 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 907 87 87 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 908 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 909A 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 909B 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 910 35 35 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 911 3 3 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 912A 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 912B 15 15 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 913 16 16 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 914A 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 914B 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 914C 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 915A 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 915B 1 1 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Block Group 9 401 401 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Tract 0142.03 3,626 3,344 271 2 5 4 100.00% 92.22% 7.47% 0.06% 0.14% 0.11% Tract 0143.01 Block Group 4 Block 401A 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 401B 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 402 1 134 69 65 0 0 0 100.00% 51.49% 48.51% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 403A 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 403B 61 58 2 0 1 0 Block 404 13 13 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 405 20 20 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 406 13 13 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 407 15 15 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 408 26 26 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 409 38 38 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 410 60 58 0 1 1 0 100.00% 96.67% 0.00% 1.67% 1.67% 0.00% Block 411 42 42 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 412A 10 10 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 412B 22 22 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 413 10 10 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 414 25 25 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 415 63 63 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 416A 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 416B 140 140 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 417 86 86 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 418 11 11 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Block Group 4 789 719 67 1 2 0 100.00% 91.13% 8.49% 0.13% 0.25% 0.00% Total Tract 0143.01 789 719 67 1 2 0 100.00% 91.13% 8.49% 0.13% 0.25% 0.00% Total EASTERN VALLEY COMMUNITY 4,791 4,434 343 3 7 4 100.00% 92.55% 7.16% 0.06% 0.15% 0.08% FLINT HILL FIRE STATION 5,238 3,111 2,103 8 12 4 100.00% 59.39% 40.15% 0.15% 0.23% 0.08% MCDONALD CHAPEL COMMUNITY 285 39 245 1 0 0 100.00% 13.68% 85.96% 0.35% 0.00% 0.00% COOPER GREEN RECREATION CENTER 4,933 37 4,893 1 2 0 100.00% 0.75% 99.19% 0.02% 0.04% 0.00% SEMMIE LAVENDER COMMUNITY CENTER 2,703 161 2,540 0 1 1 100.00% 5.96% 93.97% 0.00% 0.04% 0.04% CENTRAL PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 9,152 3,699 5,418 11 18 6 100.00% 40.42% 59.20% 0.12% 0.20% 0.07% LEE SCHOOL 2,869 230 2,633 4 2 0 100.00% 8.02% 91.77% 0.14% 0.07% 0.00% HARRISON PARK COMMUNITY CENTER 6,344 191 6,144 2 5 2 100.00% 3.01% 96.85% 0.03% 0.08% 0.03% HEMPHILL SCHOOL RECREATION 6,250 684 5,545 15 1 5 100.00% 10.94% 88.72% 0.24% 0.02% 0.08% WENONAH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2,323 314 2,005 3 1 0 100.00% 13.52% 86.31% 0.13% 0.04% 0.00% JACKSON SCHOOL 2,452 22 2,421 9 0 0 100.00% 0.90% 98.74% 0.37% 0.00% 0.00% HILL SCHOOL 6,233 505 5,710 14 1 3 100.00% 8.10% 91.61% 0.22% 0.02% 0.05% GRAYMONT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5,260 147 5,107 3 1 2 100.00% 2.79% 97.09% 0.06% 0.02% 0.04% CENTER STREET SCHOOL 4,205 74 4,127 3 0 1 100.00% 1.76% 98.15% 0.07% 0.00% 0.02% WASHINGTON SCHOOL 4,832 20 4,807 3 0 2 100.00% 0.41% 99.48% 0.06% 0.00% 0.04% ELYTON SCHOOL 2,397 227 2,165 1 3 1 100.00% 9.47% 90.32% 0.04% 0.13% 0.04% FORTY-FIFTH STREET BAPTIST CHURCH 1,591 38 1,550 3 0 0 100.00% 2.39% 97.42% 0.19% 0.00% 0.00% NORWOOD ARMORY 3,771 146 3,619 4 2 0 100.00% 3.87% 95.97% 0.11% 0.05% 0.00% MCARTHUR SCHOOL 3,557 516 3,034 3 3 1 100.00% 14.51% 85.30% 0.08% 0.08% 0.03% CITY AUDITORIUM 4,174 19 4,151 2 1 1 100.00% 0.46% 99.45% 0.05% 0.02% 0.02% WILKERSON SCHOOL/5411 CARRIE TUGGL 3,271 38 3,217 2 7 7 100.00% 1.16% 98.35% 0.06% 0.21% 0.21% AVONDALE LIBRARY 1,828 914 893 5 10 6 100.00% 50.00% 48.85% 0.27% 0.55% 0.33% SOUTHTOWN HOUSING COMMUNITY CENTER 1,280 80 1,193 1 2 4 100.00% 6.25% 93.20% 0.08% 0.16% 0.31% BETHEL BAPTIST CHURCH 715 3 706 0 6 0 100.00% 0.42% 98.74% 0.00% 0.84% 0.00% SOUTHSIDE HOMES COMMUNITY 5,819 93 5,718 5 2 1 100.00% 1.60% 98.26% 0.90% 0.03% 0.02% THOMPSON MANOR COMMUNITY 1,961 1,357 595 5 2 2 100.00% 69.20% 30.34% 0.25% 0.10% 0.10% ST FRANCIS SCHOOL 6,090 702 5,376 6 0 6 100.00% 11.53% 88.28% 0.10% 0.00% 0.10% BESSEMER CITY HALL 2,402 1,578 815 6 0 3 100.00% 65.70% 33.93% 0.25% 0.00% 0.12% BESSEMER FIRE STATION 1,966 591 1,367 3 5 0 100.00% 30.06% 69.53% 0.15% 0.25% 0.00% NATIONAL GUARD ARMORY 2,722 414 2,305 2 0 1 100.00% 15.21% 84.68% 0.07% 0.00% 0.04% JONESBORO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 6,349 4,631 1,703 7 3 5 100.00% 72.94% 26.82% 0.11% 0.05% 0.08% ADDISON SCHOOL 743 30 713 0 0 0 100.00% 4.04% 95.96% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% WOOODWARD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 1,854 652 1,197 1 3 1 100.00% 35.17% 64.56% 0.05% 0.16% 0.05% FAIRFIELD CITY HALL 3,057 1,105 1,942 1 8 1 100.00% 36.15% 63.53% 0.03% 0.26% 0.03% FAIRFIELD FIRE STATION 4,020 115 3,900 4 0 1 100.00% 2.86% 97.01% 0.10% 0.00% 0.02% MIDFIELD COMMUNITY CENTER 2,973 2,590 354 13 16 0 100.00% 87.12% 11.91% 0.44% 0.54% 0.00% BRIGHTON HIGH SCHOOL 1,771 69 1,701 0 1 0 100.00% 3.90% 96.05% 0.00% 0.06% 0.00% ROOSEVELT SCHOOL 2,511 56 2,452 2 1 0 100.00% 2.23% 97.65% 0.08% 0.04% 0.00% LIPSCOMB CITY HALL 3,049 1,564 1,475 2 8 0 100.00% 51.30% 48.38% 0.07% 0.26% 0.00% BYRANTS CHAPEL AME CHURCH 4,317 38 4,279 0 0 0 100.00% 0.88% 99.12% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% RILEY SCHOOL 5,401 398 4,986 1 14 2 100.00% 7.37% 92.32% 0.02% 0.26% 0.04% FIRE STATION 29 9,112 5,371 3,717 14 6 4 100.00% 58.94% 40.79% 0.15% 0.07% 0.04% CURRY SCHOOL 4,419 2,824 1,560 4 22 9 100.00% 63.91% 35.30% 0.09% 0.50% 0.20% WILLOWWOOD RECREATION CENTER 5,559 1,031 4,484 16 20 8 100.00% 18.55% 80.66% 0.29% 0.36% 0.14% AL YOUTH SERVICES VACCA 3,092 1,425 1,643 0 19 5 100.00% 46.09% 53.14% 0.00% 0.61% 0.16% OPORTO ARMORY/5801 TARRANT CITY HA 4,144 205 3,937 1 0 1 100.00% 4.95% 95.00% 0.02% 0.00% 0.02% INGLENOOK SCHOOL/5910 MT PARK FIRS 4,240 1,650 2,570 2 3 15 100.00% 38.92% 60.61% 0.05% 0.07% 0.35% MORTON SIMPSON COMMUNITY CENTER 5,513 694 4,814 3 1 1 100.00% 12.59% 87.32% 0.05% 0.02% 0.02% HUDSON SCHOOL 3,604 0 3,600 2 2 0 100.00% 0.00% 99.89% 0.06% 0.06% 0.00% NORTH BHAM RECREATION CENTER 3,629 504 3,121 2 2 0 100.00% 13.89% 86.00% 0.06% 0.06% 0.00% WRIGHTS CHAPEL UNITED METHODIST 2,700 41 2,657 0 0 2 100.00% 1.52% 98.41% 0.00% 0.00% 0.07% HOOPER CITY RECREATION CENTER 2,362 2 2,357 0 1 2 100.00% 0.08% 99.79% 0.00% 0.04% 0.08% LEWIS SCHOOL 1,458 0 1,457 0 1 0 100.00% 0.00% 99.93% 0.00% 0.07% 0.00% HARRIMAN PARK RECREATION 613 1 612 0 0 0 100.00% 0.16% 99.84% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% MOUNT HEBRON BAPTIST CHURCH 4,494 450 4,042 1 1 0 100.00% 10.01% 89.94% 0.02% 0.02% 0.00% WOODROW WILSON SCHOOL 6,604 1,727 4,841 3 28 5 100.00% 26.15% 73.30% 0.05% 0.42% 0.08% FAIRVIEW SCHOOL 6,168 1,401 4,737 17 11 2 100.00% 22.17% 76.80% 0.28% 0.18% 0.03% ENSLEY HIGH SCHOOL GYM 3,846 80 3,755 2 9 0 100.00% 2.08% 97.63% 0.05% 0.23% 0.00% EAST ENSLEY BRANCH PUBLIC LIBRARY 2,720 15 2,697 1 7 0 100.00% 0.55% 99.15% 0.04% 0.26% 0.00% HOWZE SANDFORD RECREATION 1,859 32 1,827 0 0 0 100.00% 1.72% 98.28% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% PRATT CITY FIRE STATION 2,692 428 2,261 0 3 0 100.00% 15.90% 83.99% 0.00% 0.11% 0.00% GOERGE N SCOTT SCHOOL 4,584 109 4,468 0 6 1 100.00% 2.38% 97.47% 0.00% 0.13% 0.02% Total Jefferson County 258,515 62,630 195,135 252 346 152 100.00% 24.23% 75.48% 0.10% 0.13% 0.06% Lowndes County 12,658 3,185 9,456 10 4 3 100.00% 25.16% 74.70% 0.08% 0.03% 0.02% Marengo County 23.084 11,314 11,745 11 11 3 100.00% 49.01% 50.88% 0.05% 0.05% 0.01% Montgomery County NORMANDALE LIBRARY Tract 0022 Block Group 3 Block 301 30 3 27 0 0 0 100.00% 10.00% 90.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 311 53 1 52 0 0 0 100.00% 1.89% 98.11% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Block Group 3 83 4 79 0 0 0 100.00% 4.82% 95.18% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Tract 0022 83 4 79 0 0 0 100.00% 4.82% 95.18% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total NORMANDALE LIBRARY 83 4 79 0 0 0 100.00% 4.82% 95.18% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% BELLINGRATH COMMUNITY CENTER 2,277 102 2,166 0 0 9 100.00% 4.48% 95.13% 0.00% 0.00% 0.40% BEULAH BAPTIST CHURCH 8,252 380 7,861 3 2 6 100.00% 4.60% 95.26% 0.04% 0.02% 0.07% CARVER HIGH SCHOOL 3,535 43 3,478 4 6 4 100.00% 1.22% 98.39% 0.11% 0.17% 0.11% CAPITAL CITY BOYS CLUB 3,524 387 3,103 8 17 9 100.00% 10.98% 88.05% 0.23% 0.48% 0.26% MONTGOMERY BOYS CLUB 2,472 1,198 1,249 6 16 3 100.00% 48.46% 50.53% 0.24% 0.65% 0.12% HAYNEVILLE ROAD COMMUNITY CENTER 3,177 320 2,847 5 5 0 100.00% 10.07% 89.61% 0.16% 0.16% 0.00% FORT SHEPERD ARMORY 3,013 374 2,635 0 3 1 100.00% 12.41% 87.45% 0.00% 0.10% 0.03% WILLIAM HARRISON ELEMENTARY 1,688 145 1,540 1 1 1 100.00% 8.59% 91.23% 0.06% 0.06% 0.06% SOUTHLAWN ELEMENTARY 5,345 157 5,179 2 4 3 100.00% 2.94% 96.89% 0.04% 0.07% 0.06% HOUSTON HILL COMMUNITY CENTER 3,648 406 3,228 13 1 0 100.00% 11.13% 88.49% 0.36% 0.03% 0.00% ALABAMA STATE UNIVERSITY 4,151 480 3,652 7 9 3 100.00% 11.56% 87.98% 0.17% 0.22% 0.07% HAMNER HALL FIRE STATION 2,524 499 1,999 12 12 2 100.00% 19.77% 79.20% 0.48% 0.48% 0.08% GOODE STREET SCHOOL 5,764 394 5,355 2 8 5 100.00% 6.84% 92.90% 0.03% 0.14% 0.09% MCINTYRE COMMUNITY CENTER 4,767 67 4,697 3 0 0 100.00% 1.41% 98.53% 0.06% 0.00% 0.00% NEWTOWN COMMUNITY CENTER 4,252 1,111 3,115 7 16 3 100.00% 26.13% 73.26% 0.16% 0.38% 0.07% NORTH COMMUNITY CENTER 5,882 2,165 3,664 8 40 5 100.00% 36.81% 62.29% 0.14% 0.68% 0.09% UNION ACADEMY BAPTIST CHURCH 323 121 202 0 0 0 100.00% 37.46% 62.54% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% UNION CHAPEL AME ZION CHURCH 1,599 559 1,036 3 1 0 100.00% 34.96% 64.79% 0.19% 0.06% 0.00% KING HILL COMMUNITY CENTER 1,687 712 958 4 13 0 100.00% 42.21% 56.79% 0.24% 0.77% 0.00% CATOMA SCHOOL 1,975 1,691 267 6 10 1 100.00% 85.62% 13.52% 0.30% 0.51% 0.05% HOPE HULL CHURCH OF CHRIST 718 348 354 1 2 13 100.00% 48.47% 49.30% 0.14% 0.28% 1.81% SNOWDOWN WOMEN'S CLUB 565 222 338 4 1 0 100.00% 39.29% 59.82% 0.71% 0.18% 0.00% NEWELL BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION 1,064 746 311 2 0 5 100.00% 70.11% 29.23% 0.19% 0.00% 0.47% FLETA MASONIC LODGE 1,431 867 558 4 2 0 100.00% 60.59% 38.99% 0.28% 0.14% 0.00% LAPINE COMMUNITY CENTER 1,000 577 420 0 3 0 100.00% 57.70% 42.00% 0.00% 0.30% 0.00% ALABAMA NATIONAL BANK-RAMER Tract 0058 Block Group 1 Block 101 39 5 34 0 0 0 100.00% 12.82% 87.18% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 102 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 103 14 14 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 105 3 3 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 106 93 20 73 0 0 0 100.00% 21.51% 78.49% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 107 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 109 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 119 176 120 56 0 0 0 100.00% 68.18% 31.82% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 121 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 122 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 123 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 152 13 0 13 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 153 39 36 3 0 0 0 100.00% 92.31% 7.69% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 154 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 199C 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 199C 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 199C 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 199C 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 199C 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 199C 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 199C 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 199C 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 199C 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 199C 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 199C 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 199C 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 199C 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 199C 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 199C 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 199C 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Block Group 1 377 198 179 0 0 0 100.00% 52.52% 47.48% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block Group 2 Block 206 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 207 2 2 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 208 80 50 30 0 0 0 100.00% 62.50% 37.50% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 217 141 44 93 4 0 0 100.00% 31.21% 65.96% 2.84% 0.00% 0.00% Block 218 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 219 27 5 22 0 0 0 100.00% 18.52% 81.48% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 220 7 7 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 221 3 3 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 222 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 223 18 18 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 224 1 1 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 225 2 2 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Water block 299E 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 299F 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 299G 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 229H 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Block Group 2 281 132 145 4 0 0 100.00% 46.98% 51.60% 1.42% 0.00% 0.00% Block Group 3 Block 302 50 40 10 0 0 0 100.00% 80.00% 20.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 303 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 304 57 48 9 0 0 0 100.00% 84.21% 15.79% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 305 18 18 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 306 7 6 1 0 0 0 100.00% 85.71% 14.29% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 307 5 5 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 308 10 10 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 309 26 26 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 310 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 311 15 15 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 312 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 313 29 26 3 0 0 0 100.00% 89.66% 10.34% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 314 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 322 1 1 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 324 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 325 1 1 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 326 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 327 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 328 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 329 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 330 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 331 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 399A 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 399B 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 339C 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total block Group 3 219 196 23 0 0 0 100.00% 89.50% 10.50% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block Group 4 Block 401 30 28 2 0 0 0 100.00% 93.33% 6.67% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 402 5 5 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Water block 499G 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Block Group 4 35 33 2 0 0 0 100.00% 94.29% 5.71% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Tract 0058 912 559 349 4 0 0 100.00% 61.29% 38.27% 0.44% 0.00% 0.00% Total ALABAMA NATIONAL BANK-RAMER 912 559 349 4 0 0 100.00% 61.29% 38.27% 0.44% 0.00% 0.00% Total Montgomery County 75,628 14,634 60,640 109 172 73 100.00% 19.35% 80.18% 0.14% 0.23% 0.10% Perry County 12,759 4,503 8,219 16 14 7 100.00% 35.29% 64.42% 0.13% 0.11% 0.05% Pickens County COCHRANE 587 171 416 0 0 0 100.00% 29.13% 70.87% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% ETHELSVILLE 408 47 361 0 0 0 100.00% 11.52% 88.48% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% CARROLLTON Tract 9879 Block Group 3 Block 306B 3 3 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Block Group 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Tract 9879 3 3 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total CARROLLTON 3 3 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% PINE GROVE 174 106 68 0 0 0 100.00% 60.92% 39.08% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% SPRING HILL 126 46 80 0 0 0 100.00% 36.51% 63.49% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% PICKENSVILLE 702 204 497 1 0 0 100.00% 29.06% 70.80% 0.14% 0.00% 0.00% SAPPS Tract 9879 Block Group 3 Block 311 248 35 213 0 0 0 100.00% 14.11% 85.89% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 312 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 313 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 314 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 320 31 24 7 0 0 0 100.00% 77.42% 22.58% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 321 73 16 57 0 0 0 100.00% 21.92% 78.08% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 322 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 323 66 0 66 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 324 17 0 17 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 325 140 0 140 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Water block 399C 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 399D 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 399E 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 399F 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 399G 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 399H 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 399J 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 399K 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Block Group 3 575 75 500 0 0 0 100.00% 13.04% 86.96% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block Group 4 Block 439 28 0 28 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 440 119 20 99 0 0 0 100.00% 16.81% 83.19% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 469 17 17 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 470 3 3 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Water block 499W 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 499X 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Block Group 4 167 40 127 0 0 0 100.00% 23.95% 76.05% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Tract 9879 742 115 627 0 0 0 100.00% 15.50% 84.50% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total SAPPS 742 115 627 0 0 0 100.00% 15.50% 84.50% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Pickens County 2,742 692 2,049 1 0 0 100.00% 25.24% 74.73% 0.04% 0.00% 0.00% Sumter County 16,174 4,759 11,369 6 30 10 100.00% 29.42% 70.29% 0.04% 0.19% 0.06% Tuscaloosa County STILLMAN COLLEGE 9,591 419 9,159 8 3 2 100.00% 4.37% 95.50% 0.08% 0.03% 0.02% MCDONALD HUGHES COMM CENTER 3,599 17 3,578 2 0 2 100.00% 0.47% 99.42% 0.06% 0.00% 0.06% ARMY RESERVE CENTER 9,021 4,219 4,736 11 38 17 100.00% 46.77% 52.50% 0.12% 0.42% 0.19% BAMA MALL 9,714 5,805 3,804 24 65 16 100.00% 59.76% 39.16% 0.25% 0.67% 0.16% REGIONAL EDUCATION CENTER Tract 0104.03 Block Group 1 Block 101A 2 2 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 101B 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 101C 10 10 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 102 198 160 35 0 3 0 100.00% 80.81% 17.68% 0.00% 1.52% 0.00% Block 103 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 104A 262 187 74 0 1 0 100.00% 71.37% 28.24% 0.00% 0.38% 0.00% Block 104B 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 104C 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 105 139 97 42 0 0 0 100.00% 69.78% 30.22% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 106 12 7 5 0 0 0 100.00% 58.33% 41.67% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 107 16 12 4 0 0 0 100.00% 75.00% 25.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 108 82 14 68 0 0 0 100.00% 17.07% 82.93% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 109 24 24 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 110 14 14 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 111 72 72 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 112 11 11 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 113 11 11 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 114 7 7 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 115 19 19 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 116 20 16 4 0 0 0 100.00% 80.00% 20.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 117 62 7 55 0 0 0 100.00% 11.29% 88.71% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 118 25 6 19 0 0 0 100.00% 24.00% 76.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 119 19 19 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 120 7 7 0 0 0 0 100.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 121 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 122 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Block Group 1 1,012 702 306 0 4 0 100.00% 69.37% 30.24% 0.00% 0.40% 0.00% Total Tract 0104.03 1,012 702 306 0 4 0 100.00% 69.37% 30.24% 0.00% 0.40% 0.00% Tract 0104.04 Block Group 1 Block 102 34 0 34 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 103 25 0 25 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 104 32 1 31 0 0 0 100.00% 3.13% 96.88% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 105 49 2 47 0 0 0 100.00% 4.08% 95.92% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 106 10 0 10 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 107 8 0 8 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 108 43 0 43 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 109 21 0 21 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 110 13 0 13 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 111 24 1 23 0 0 0 100.00% 4.17% 95.83% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 112 19 1 18 0 0 0 100.00% 5.26% 94.74% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 113 93 0 93 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 114 38 0 38 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 115 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 116 31 0 31 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 117 15 0 15 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 118 16 0 16 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Block Group 1 471 5 466 0 0 0 100.00% 1.06% 98.94% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block Group 2 Block 201 17 1 16 0 0 0 100.00% 5.88% 94.12% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 202 77 0 77 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 203 36 0 36 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 204 67 0 67 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 205 14 0 14 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 206 16 0 16 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 207 96 0 96 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 208 5 0 5 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 209 25 0 25 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 210 102 5 97 0 0 0 100.00% 4.90% 95.10% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 211 110 3 107 0 0 0 100.00% 2.73% 97.27% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 212 30 0 30 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 213 1 0 1 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 214 37 7 30 0 0 0 100.00% 18.92% 81.08% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 215 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 299 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Block Group 2 633 16 617 0 0 0 100.00% 2.53% 97.47% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block Group 3 Block 310 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 311 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 312 7 1 6 0 0 0 100.00% 14.29% 85.71% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 317 14 0 14 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 318 7 0 7 0 0 0 100.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Block 319 0 0 0 0 0 0 Block 323 0 0 0 0 0 0 Water block 399A 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Block Group 3 28 1 27 0 0 0 100.00% 3.57% 96.43% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total Tract 0104.04 1,132 22 1,110 0 0 0 100.00% 1.94% 98.06% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% Total REGIONAL EDUCATION CENTER 2,144 724 1,416 0 4 0 100.00% 33.77% 66.04% 0.00% 0.19% 0.00% MCFARLAND MALL 13,467 10,532 2,726 19 172 18 100.00% 78.21% 20.24% 0.14% 1.28% 0.13% COTTONDALE METHODIST CHURCH 3,492 3,447 39 2 1 3 100.00% 98.71% 1.12% 0.06% 0.03% 0.09% COALING COMMUNITY CENTER 2,476 2,203 247 21 5 0 100.00% 88.97% 9.98% 0.85% 0.20% 0.00% VANCE COMMUNITY CENTER 1,519 1,491 28 0 0 0 100.00% 98.16% 1.84% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% MASONIC LODGE/BUCKS VILLE BAPTIST/L 4,398 4,176 204 13 5 0 100.00% 94.95% 4.64% 0.30% 0.11% 0.00% BF GOODRICH UNION HALL 972 518 453 0 1 0 100.00% 53.29% 46.60% 0.00% 0.10% 0.00% HILLCREST HIGH 3,276 2,727 531 7 11 0 100.00% 83.24% 16.21% 0.21% 0.34% 0.00% BIG SANDY BAPTIST CHURCH 2,302 1,547 751 3 1 0 100.00% 67.20% 32.62% 0.13% 0.04% 0.00% DUNCANVILLE CHURCH/COMMUNITY CENTE 3,212 3,072 131 3 2 4 100.00% 95.64% 4.08% 0.09% 0.06% 0.12% Total Tuscaloosa County 69,183 40,897 27,803 113 308 62 100.00% 59.11% 40.19% 0.16% 0.45% 0.09% Wilcox County 13,568 4,203 9,353 6 6 0 100.00% 30.98% 68.93% 0.04% 0.04% 0.00% Total District 7 577,227 185,454 389,796 599 1,045 333 100.00% 32.13% 67.53% 0.10% 0.18% 0.06%


I concur in the Judgment and Order of the Court for the reasons expressed therein, except as noted below, but I write separately to emphasize a point which the opinion does not address as squarely as I feel it should. Accepting as fact the statements contained in the stipulation of the parties that this State has a substantial African-American minority that is relatively geographically compact so as to comprise a minority district which complies with the population equality requirement of Karcher v. Dagget, 462 U.S. 725, 103 S.Ct. 2653, 77 L.Ed.2d 133 (1983), and no evidence or argument being presented that the establishment of such a district would violate any requirement of the law, I agree with the decision to accept the parties' joint request for the creation of such a district as a remedy and as a remedy only. In so doing, my concurrence should in no way be considered as an agreement that such a result is constitutionally mandated. It simply is not.

Those in high and low places who advocate racial gerrymandering to create African-American congressional districts would do well to remember the reasoned dissents of the first Mr. Justice Harlan wherein he stated in Plessy v. Ferguson: "There is no caste here. Our Constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens." 163 U.S. 537, 558, 16 S.Ct. 1138, 1146, 41 L.Ed. 256 (1985); and of Mr. Justice William O. Douglas who later addressed this point with an equally persuasive dissent in Wright v. Rockefeller, 376 U.S. 52, 59-67, 84 S.Ct. 603, 606-11, 11 L.Ed.2d 512 (1964):

Here no Negroes are deprived of the franchise. Rather, zigzag tortuous lines are drawn to concentrate Negroes and Puerto Ricans into Manhattan's Eighteenth Congressional District and practically to exclude them from the Seventeenth Congressional District.

. . . . .

The intervenors are person who apparently have a vested interest in control of the segregated Eighteenth District. [footnote $ 4: Adam Clayton Powell has represented the Eighteenth District in Congress since 1945] They and the State seem to support this segregation not on the "separate but equal" theory of Plessy v. Ferguson but on the another theory. Their theory might be called the theory of "separate but better of" — a theory that has been used before.

. . . . .

Here the individual is important, not his race, his creed, or his color. The principle of equality is at war the notion that District A must be represented by a Negro, as it is with the notion that District B must be represented by a Caucasian, District C by a Jew, District D by a Catholic, and so on. . . . That system, by whatever name it is called, is a divisive force in a community, emphasizing differences between candidates and voters that are irrelevant in the constitutional sense. Of course race, like religion, plays an important role in the choices which individual voters make from among various candidates. [footnote omitted]. But government has no business designing electoral districts along racial or religious lines.

. . . . .

When racial or religious lines are drawn by the State, the multiracial, multireligious communities that our Constitution seeks to weld together as one becomes separatist; antagonisms that relate to race or to religion rather than to political issues are generated; communities seek not the best representative but the best racial or religious partisan. Since that system is at war with the democratic ideal, it should find no footing here.
"Separate but equal" and "separate but better off" have no more place in voting districts than they have in schools, parks, railroad terminals, or any other facility serving the public.

As I perceive it, the chief danger, which these Justices recognized and so eloquently articulated, is judicial and legislative ghettoizing of the vote. The resulting balkanization is antithetical to the American dream, and I do not wish to be associated with any such action or effort, thus I write separately to this point.


Summaries of

Wesch v. Hunt

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, S.D
May 18, 1992
785 F. Supp. 1491 (S.D. Ala. 1992)

In Wesch the plaintiffs attacked the then existing congressional districting scheme on the grounds that it violated the United States Constitution and section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.

Summary of this case from Wesch v. Folsom

modifying Alabama's congressional redistricting plan so that two incumbent congressmen would not be in the same district

Summary of this case from LARIOS v. COX

modifying Alabama's congressional redistricting plan so that two incumbent congressmen would not be in the same district

Summary of this case from LARIOS v. COX
Case details for

Wesch v. Hunt

Case Details

Full title:Paul Charles WESCH, Plaintiff, Michael Figures, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, S.D

Date published: May 18, 1992

Citations

785 F. Supp. 1491 (S.D. Ala. 1992)

Citing Cases

Singleton v. Merrill

District 7 became a majority-Black district when a three-judge federal court drew it that way in a ruling…

Allen v. Milligan

In 1992, several plaintiffs sued the State, alleging that it had been impermissibly diluting the votes of…