From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Werner v. United States

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nov 2, 1936
86 F.2d 113 (2d Cir. 1936)

Opinion

No. 61.

November 2, 1936.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of New York.

Action by Isabell Katherine Werner, as administratrix, against the United States, to recover under a policy of war risk insurance. From a judgment of the District Court dismissing the petition, plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

Daniel J. O'Mara, of Rochester, N.Y. (Edmund Clynes, of Rochester, N.Y., of counsel), for appellant.

George L. Grobe, U.S. Atty., of Buffalo, N.Y. (Joseph J. Doran, Asst. U.S. Atty., of Rochester, N.Y., of counsel), for the United States.

Before L. HAND, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.


The only question in this case is whether the petitioner filed a "claim" under section 445 of title 38, U.S.Code (38 U.S.C.A. § 445), when her attorney sent to the Veterans' Administration the following letter:

"Isabelle Werner, widow of the above named veteran has consulted me in reference to her claim against the $10,000 War Risk insurance of the above named veteran, her deceased husband. This veteran has been dead over eighteen months and she has not received any remuneration of any kind.

"Kindly forward to me immediately the necessary forms and information for filing her claim in official form in your department."

We are to assume that this letter was received, but there is no evidence that the Administration ever took any action under it. Obviously they could not treat it as a "claim" to be "denied," or as the basis of a "disagreement"; it was merely preparatory and assumed that a "claim" would follow upon the official form. Under section 445 the time to sue expired on July 1, 1931; the letter was mailed on February 3, 1931. The section tolls from the limitation any period between the filing of the "claim" and its "denial" by the Administrator, leaving to the insured whatever remains of his period when he filed. It follows that the "claim" must be something which the Administrator can refuse. No doubt it may be very informal, but it must at least be the assertion of a present demand, not an announcement that a demand will be made. No official can take any action on such a paper.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Werner v. United States

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nov 2, 1936
86 F.2d 113 (2d Cir. 1936)
Case details for

Werner v. United States

Case Details

Full title:WERNER v. UNITED STATES

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Nov 2, 1936

Citations

86 F.2d 113 (2d Cir. 1936)

Citing Cases

United States v. Meakins

We think that even a casual reading of the mother's letter of June 1, 1919, indicates such an intention. It…

Wang v. United States

While no particular form is necessary for the presentation of a claim under 38 U.S.C. § 784, the courts have…