From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wenmoth v. Duncan

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 9, 2010
382 F. App'x 271 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-7750, 09-7826, 10-6073.

Submitted: May 13, 2010.

Decided: June 9, 2010.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:08-cv-00182-JPB-JSK).

Andrew D. Wenmoth, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas E. Buck, April Joy Wheeler, Bailey Wyant, PLLC, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Before DUNCAN and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.


Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

ON REHEARING


In these consolidated appeals, Andrew D. Wenmoth appeals the district court's orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Wenmoth's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wenmoth v. Duncan, No. 3:08-cv-00182-JPB-JSK, 2009 WL 2707579 (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 26, 2009 2009 WL 5125202, Dec. 18, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Wenmoth v. Duncan

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 9, 2010
382 F. App'x 271 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Wenmoth v. Duncan

Case Details

Full title:Andrew D. WENMOTH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ovid Wesley DUNCAN, Jr.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jun 9, 2010

Citations

382 F. App'x 271 (4th Cir. 2010)