From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wengeroth v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Oct 10, 1956
294 S.W.2d 122 (Tex. Crim. App. 1956)

Opinion

No. 28404.

June 20, 1956. On Motion to Reinstate Appeal October 10, 1956.

Appeal from the County Court, Goliad County, Linton S. Benge, J.

Floyd D. James, San Antonio, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


The conviction is for the offense of unlawfully hunting deer with an artificial light; the punishment, a fine of $50.

In the absence of a bound or recognizance on appeal, or a showing that appellant is in jail, we are without jurisdiction of this misdemeanor appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.

On Motion to Reinstate Appeal.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The record has now been perfected, and the case is properly before this Court for decision.

Omitting the formal parts of the complaint, we quote the following:

`* * * did then and there unlawfully and willfully hunt deer by the aid of an artificial light attached to an automobile, or did then and there unlawfully and willfully hunt deer by the aid of an artificial light * * *.' (Italics ours.)

The use of the disjunctive 'or' in charging an offense renders the allegation uncertain. 'Manual of Reversible Errors' by Erisman, Sec. 24, p. 16, and cases there cited.

The motion to reinstate the appeal is granted, and the judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.


Summaries of

Wengeroth v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Oct 10, 1956
294 S.W.2d 122 (Tex. Crim. App. 1956)
Case details for

Wengeroth v. State

Case Details

Full title:Paul WENGEROTH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Oct 10, 1956

Citations

294 S.W.2d 122 (Tex. Crim. App. 1956)
163 Tex. Crim. 511

Citing Cases

Hunter v. State

The cases of Scott v. State, 153 Tex.Crim. R., 221 S.W.2d 608 (1949), and Nichols v. State, 171 Tex.Crim. R.,…