From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wendell v. Sylvan Lawrence Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 23, 2001
279 A.D.2d 383 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

January 23, 2001.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered December 3, 1999, which, inter alia, granted defendants building owner's and building tenant's motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs' Labor Law §§ 240(1) 200 causes of action, and denied plaintiffs' cross motion for summary judgment on the issue of defendants' liability under Labor Law § 240(1), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Ira H. Goldfarb, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Anthony J. McNulty, for defendants-respondents .

Before: Williams, J.P., Andrias, Lerner, Saxe, Buckley, JJ.


After performing repairs in the fan room on the roof of defendants' building, plaintiff, while on his way back into the building, tripped and fell over water condenser pipes permanently attached to the roof and 2½ feet off the ground. Plaintiff's Labor Law § 240(1) cause of action was properly dismissed since plaintiff did not use the pipes in the performance of the repair work in the fan room, and indeed could have avoided the pipes altogether by taking alternate routes back into building; thus, the pipes were hardly the functional equivalent of a scaffold (compare, Brennan v. RCP Assocs., 257 A.D.2d 389, lv dismissed_ 93 N.Y.2d 889; Craft v. Clark Trading Corp., 257 A.D.2d 886, 887-888). In addition, plaintiff's fall over the pipes was not a gravity-related accident as contemplated by Labor Law § 240(1) (see_, Melber v. 6333 Main St., 91 N.Y.2d 759, 762-763). As the IAS court stated, plaintiff did not fall from a height but simply tripped over low-lying, permanently attached, normally appurtenant objects that he had climbed over many times before. Since any danger posed by these pipes was open and obvious to plaintiff, who had traversed them many times during his 27-year period of employment and did so shortly before this incident, the Labor Law § 200 cause of action was also properly dismissed (see_, Brezinski v. Olympia York Water St. Co., 218 A.D.2d 633, 635).


Summaries of

Wendell v. Sylvan Lawrence Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 23, 2001
279 A.D.2d 383 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Wendell v. Sylvan Lawrence Co.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT WENDELL, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. SYLVAN LAWRENCE CO., ET…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 23, 2001

Citations

279 A.D.2d 383 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
720 N.Y.S.2d 24

Citing Cases

Jones v. Presbyterian Hosp. in the City of New York

In Isola v. JWP Forest Elec. Corp. ( 267 A.D.2d 157), the plaintiff was an iron worker who tripped over a…

Whitaker v. Long Island Rail Road Company

To prevail under such a claim, a plaintiff must provide evidence that the statute was violated and that the…