From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weltick v. Tufano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1931
233 App. Div. 875 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Opinion

June, 1931.


Order denying motion to dismiss the second cause of action in the complaint affirmed, without costs, with leave to defendant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein. No opinion. Summons amended under section 105 of the Civil Practice Act, by adding thereto as a plaintiff the name of Harry Weltick upon the ground that the name was omitted through mistake or inadvertence. Lazansky, P.J., Kapper, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Weltick v. Tufano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1931
233 App. Div. 875 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)
Case details for

Weltick v. Tufano

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET WELTICK, by Her Guardian ad Litem, HARRY WELTICK, and HARRY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1931

Citations

233 App. Div. 875 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Citing Cases

People ex rel. Di Leo v. Edwards

This section has been viewed by the courts as remedial in its nature in respect to procedure, to the end that…

Licato v. Licato

The defendant consented to it. (See Spooner v. Delaware, L. W.R.R. Co., 115 N.Y. 22; Perkins v. Stimmel, 114…