From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wells Fargo Bank v. Barot

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Feb 6, 2019
169 A.D.3d 747 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

2017–04464 Index No. 706594/15

02-06-2019

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, etc., Respondent, v. Sanjay BAROT, etc., Appellant.

Peter A. Joseph, New York, NY, for appellant. Sandelands Eyet LLP, New York, N.Y. (Kathleen Cavanaugh of counsel), for respondent.


Peter A. Joseph, New York, NY, for appellant.

Sandelands Eyet LLP, New York, N.Y. (Kathleen Cavanaugh of counsel), for respondent.

MARK C. DILLON, J.P., ROBERT J. MILLER, HECTOR D. LASALLE, ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Sanjay Barot appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Timothy J. Dufficy, J.), entered March 21, 2017. The order denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 2221(d) to reargue, in effect, inter alia, his prior motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(2) and (3) to dismiss the complaint, which motion was denied by an order of the same court entered May 18, 2016.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

No appeal lies from the denial of a motion to reargue (see Landmark Capital Partners, LLC v. Greaves, 164 A.D.3d 573, 78 N.Y.S.3d 686 ; Boakye–Yiadom v. Roosevelt Union Free School Dist., 57 A.D.3d 929, 871 N.Y.S.2d 314 ). Thus, the appeal must be dismissed.

DILLON, J.P., MILLER, LASALLE and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wells Fargo Bank v. Barot

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Feb 6, 2019
169 A.D.3d 747 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Wells Fargo Bank v. Barot

Case Details

Full title:Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, etc., respondent, v. Sanjay Barot…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Feb 6, 2019

Citations

169 A.D.3d 747 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 927
91 N.Y.S.3d 701

Citing Cases

HSBC Bank U.S. v. Guaman

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The appeal must be dismissed, as no…