From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Welk v. Sorenson

Supreme Court of California.Department Two
Jan 27, 1919
179 Cal. 604 (Cal. 1919)

Opinion

L. A. No. 4721.

January 27, 1919.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County refusing to credit costs upon a judgment. Grant Jackson, Judge. Affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Edward E. Kelley and Dian R. Gardner, for Appellant.

E.S. Janes, for Respondents.


This is an appeal from an order refusing to credit the sum of $15 costs (for which judgment had been entered in favor of Grace A. Sorenson) upon a judgment against her codefendant in the same action, Albert Sorenson, the appellant basing the argument against the order largely upon the case of Adams v. Baker, 24 Nev. 375, [55 P. 362].

The appeal is by the alternative method, but appellant neither prints any of the record in the brief nor designates in any way the parts of the transcript upon which the alleged "statement of facts" is based. We will not, therefore, consider the brief. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 953c; Estate of Keith, 175 Cal. 26, [ 165 P. 10]; Miller v. Oliver, 174 Cal. 404, [ 163 P. 357].)

Order affirmed.

Wilbur, J., and Lennon, J., concurred.


Summaries of

Welk v. Sorenson

Supreme Court of California.Department Two
Jan 27, 1919
179 Cal. 604 (Cal. 1919)
Case details for

Welk v. Sorenson

Case Details

Full title:THEODORE J. WELK, Appellant, v. ALBERT SORENSON et al., Respondents

Court:Supreme Court of California.Department Two

Date published: Jan 27, 1919

Citations

179 Cal. 604 (Cal. 1919)
178 P. 498

Citing Cases

Whiting-Mead Commercial Company of San Diego v. Richards

The appeal is by the alternative method, and on the clerk's transcript alone. [1] The exact condition of the…

Roberts v. Allen

They, or copies thereof, are not attached to the pleadings or to the transcript. Because of these facts, we…