From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Welex a Div. of Halliburton Co. v. Broom

Supreme Court of Texas
Oct 16, 1991
816 S.W.2d 340 (Tex. 1991)

Opinion

No. D-0898.

October 16, 1991.

Appeal from the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas Alfonso Chapa, J.

Harry M. Reasoner, Marie R. Yeates, W. James Kronzer, Jr., Houston, M.W. Meredith, Corpus Christi, Penelope E. Nicholson, Linda K. McCloud, Houston, for appellant.

Russell H. McMains, Arnulfo Gonzalez, Jr., Kimberly Hall, Corpus Christi, for appellee.


The trial court rendered default judgment against petitioner as sanctions for abuse of discovery, and the court of appeals affirmed. 806 S.W.2d 855. We believe that the court of appeals should have the opportunity to reconsider the rulings of which petitioner complains in this proceeding in light of our recent opinion in TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. Powell, 811 S.W.2d 913 (Tex. 1991). Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 170, Tex.R.App.P., without hearing oral argument, a majority of this Court grants the application for writ of error in this case, and without addressing the merits of the application, vacates the judgment of the court of appeals and remands the case to that court for further proceedings.Copyright (c) West Group 1998 No claim to original U.S. Govt. works


Summaries of

Welex a Div. of Halliburton Co. v. Broom

Supreme Court of Texas
Oct 16, 1991
816 S.W.2d 340 (Tex. 1991)
Case details for

Welex a Div. of Halliburton Co. v. Broom

Case Details

Full title:WELEX, a DIVISION OF HALLIBURTON COMPANY v. Jerry Wayne BROOM

Court:Supreme Court of Texas

Date published: Oct 16, 1991

Citations

816 S.W.2d 340 (Tex. 1991)

Citing Cases

In re Doe 2

Tex.R.App.P. 60.2(f).See, e.g., Bacon v. General Devices, Inc., 830 S.W.2d 106, 107 (Tex. 1992); Welex, A…

Crosstex N. Tex. Pipleline, L.P. v. Gardiner

Because today's decision provides clarification of the law, we affirm the court of appeals' judgment…