From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weitzner v. Sanofi Pasteur, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 14, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-cv-2198 (M.D. Pa. May. 14, 2012)

Summary

noting that "now that the TCPA has recognized federal question jurisdiction, there is no room for a court to determine that any state class action law could preclude the application of Rule 23 to a TCPA class action"

Summary of this case from Small v. Kmart Holding Corp.

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-cv-2198

05-14-2012

ARI WEITZNER and ARI WEITZNER, M.D., P.C., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. SANOFI PASTEUR, INC. formerly known as AVENTIS PASTEUR INC., and VAXSERVE, INC., formerly known as VACCESS AMERICA INC. Defendants.


(JUDGE CAPUTO)


ORDER

NOW, this 14th day of May, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion For Abstention, or, in the Alternative, to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), or, in the Alternative, to Stay Proceedings (Doc. 20) is DENIED.

______________

A. Richard Caputo

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Weitzner v. Sanofi Pasteur, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 14, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-cv-2198 (M.D. Pa. May. 14, 2012)

noting that "now that the TCPA has recognized federal question jurisdiction, there is no room for a court to determine that any state class action law could preclude the application of Rule 23 to a TCPA class action"

Summary of this case from Small v. Kmart Holding Corp.
Case details for

Weitzner v. Sanofi Pasteur, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ARI WEITZNER and ARI WEITZNER, M.D., P.C., Individually and on Behalf of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: May 14, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11-cv-2198 (M.D. Pa. May. 14, 2012)

Citing Cases

Weitzner v. Sanofi Pasteur, Inc.

BACKGROUNDThe background of this case is set forth in the Court's May 14, 2012 Memorandum and Order denying…

Small v. Kmart Holding Corp.

In Mims v. Arrow Financial Services, LLC, 132 S.Ct. 740 (2012), the Supreme Court held that the TCPA…