From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weissman v. Friend

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 18, 1967
29 A.D.2d 599 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Opinion

December 18, 1967


Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Sullivan County, denying appellants' motion to dismiss the respondent's complaint. Appellants assert that the present action is barred by res judicata (CPLR 3211, subd. [a], par. 5). It is clear, however, as Special Term properly noted that the present action for reformation of certain shareholders' agreements, certificates of incorporations and by-laws on the grounds of mutual mistake, mistake of the scrivener or mistake of the respondent and fraud of the appellants is a different cause of action from that previously asserted in which respondent sought to assert certain rights pursuant to such documents as then constituted. Accordingly, the prior judgment is not a bar to the present action (CPLR 3002, subd. [d]; e.g., Smith v. Kirkpatrick, 305 N.Y. 66; 3 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N.Y. Civ. Prac., par. 3002.09; vol. 5, par. 5011.14). Order affirmed, with costs. Gibson, P.J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by Reynolds, J.


Summaries of

Weissman v. Friend

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 18, 1967
29 A.D.2d 599 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)
Case details for

Weissman v. Friend

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM WEISSMAN, Respondent, v. ARTHUR FRIEND et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 18, 1967

Citations

29 A.D.2d 599 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Citing Cases

Weisz v. Levitt

icle V of the State Constitution are identical to those contained in the 1974 complaint. The only allegation…

70-35 113th St. Holdings, LLC v. Auberge Grand Cent. LLC

The bankruptcy court did not determine issues pertaining to reformation on the merits. Holdings also relies…