From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weiss v. Hotung

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 2, 2003
309 A.D.2d 1231 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

CA 03-00088

October 2, 2003.

Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Erie County (Martoche, J.), entered September 24, 2002, which, inter alia, granted the motion of defendant Anthony J. Colucci, III seeking to dismiss the complaint against him and granted those parts of the motion of defendants Patrick Hotung and Violet Realty, Inc., and the cross motion of defendant Eugene Sloan seeking dismissal of the first, second, sixth and seventh causes of action against them.

RAICHLE BANNING WEISS, PLLC, BUFFALO (ARNOLD WEISS OF COUNSEL), PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT PRO SE.

COLUCCI GALLAHER, P.C., BUFFALO (PAUL G. JOYCE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS PATRICK HOTUNG, EUGENE SLOAN, AND

VIOLET REALTY, INC., AND ANTHONY J. COLUCCI, III, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT PRO SE.

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., HURLBUTT, GORSKI, AND LAWTON, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

Plaintiff commenced this action asserting causes of action for, inter alia, defamation per se, slander and libel. Supreme Court properly granted the motion of defendant Anthony J. Colucci, III seeking to dismiss the complaint against him for lack of personal jurisdiction, based on improper service of the summons and complaint ( see CPLR 3211 [a] [8]; Olsen v. Haddad, 187 A.D.2d 375, lv denied 81 N.Y.2d 707). The court also properly granted those parts of the motion of defendants Patrick Hotung and Violet Realty, Inc. and the cross motion of defendant Eugene Sloan seeking dismissal of the first, second, sixth and seventh causes of action against them because the complaint does not set forth the "particular words complained of," as required by CPLR 3016(a). Nor did the court abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint in order to replead the causes of action dismissed by the court.

We have reviewed plaintiff's remaining contentions and conclude that they are either unpreserved for our review or without merit.


Summaries of

Weiss v. Hotung

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 2, 2003
309 A.D.2d 1231 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Weiss v. Hotung

Case Details

Full title:ARNOLD WEISS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. PATRICK HOTUNG, ANTHONY J. COLUCCI…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 2, 2003

Citations

309 A.D.2d 1231 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
765 N.Y.S.2d 309

Citing Cases

Weiss v. Hotung

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action asserting causes of action for, inter alia, false arrest, false…