From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weisman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 15, 1995
651 So. 2d 148 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Summary

holding where a defendant files unsworn motion for belated appeal, trial court must afford defendant an opportunity to refile a properly sworn motion

Summary of this case from Anderson v. State

Opinion

No. 94-00937.

February 15, 1995.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Pinellas County, Bob Barker, J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Allyn Giambalvo, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Stephen A. Baker, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Brenda G. Weisman appeals the trial court's summary denial of her motion for a belated appeal filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm without prejudice to file a successive legally sufficient motion.

The defendant pleaded guilty to third-degree grand theft. On January 3, 1994, the trial court placed her on five years' probation and ordered restitution. The defendant did not file a notice of appeal within the thirty-day period as required by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(b)(2).

On February 22, 1994, trial counsel filed a rule 3.850 motion seeking a belated appeal based on ineffective assistance of counsel. The motion alleges that the defendant was unable to contact her attorney because the public defender's office was moving from one location to another. This motion was not signed or notarized by the defendant. Although trial counsel's signature is notarized, the motion was not filed "under oath." See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.987. The trial court denied relief without an evidentiary hearing.

The trial court properly denied the motion for post-conviction relief because it was not under oath as required by rule 3.850(c). Nevertheless, we conclude that the trial court should have afforded Ms. Weisman an opportunity to refile a properly sworn motion for belated appeal. See Gilliam v. State, 611 So.2d 90 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). Therefore, we affirm without prejudice to defendant filing a legally sufficient motion.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and QUINCE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Weisman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 15, 1995
651 So. 2d 148 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

holding where a defendant files unsworn motion for belated appeal, trial court must afford defendant an opportunity to refile a properly sworn motion

Summary of this case from Anderson v. State
Case details for

Weisman v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRENDA G. WEISMAN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Feb 15, 1995

Citations

651 So. 2d 148 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Goff v. State

We affirm without prejudice to appellant's right to file a motion in the trial court with the verification…

Desouza v. State

See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(c) (stating that a motion for post-conviction relief "shall be under oath . . .");…