From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weiskopf v. City of Saratoga Springs

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 7, 1936
200 N.E. 33 (N.Y. 1936)

Opinion

Argued December 5, 1935

Decided January 7, 1936

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

Theodore A. Knapp and Richard J. Sherman for appellants.

William E. Bennett for respondent.

J.A.T. Schwarte, J.A. Slade, D.J. Harrington and I.I. Goldsmith for United States Hotel Company, amicus curiae.


Judgments reversed and motion denied, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division. This is not a case to be decided on the pleadings. The constitutionality of the regulations must be decided after the facts are determined on the trial. No opinion.

Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., O'BRIEN, HUBBS, LOUGHRAN and FINCH, JJ. LEHMAN and CROUCH, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm.


Summaries of

Weiskopf v. City of Saratoga Springs

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 7, 1936
200 N.E. 33 (N.Y. 1936)
Case details for

Weiskopf v. City of Saratoga Springs

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL WEISKOPF, Respondent, v. THE CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 7, 1936

Citations

200 N.E. 33 (N.Y. 1936)
200 N.E. 33

Citing Cases

Town Board v. City of Poughkeepsie

The concept of charging different rates to different consumers, such as sanctioned in the above-mentioned…

Riverside Chemical Co. v. City of Niagara Falls

Memorandum: The answer sufficiently raises, in view of the allegations of this complaint, the issue of…