From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weisburst v. Dreifus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 6, 2009
58 A.D.3d 402 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 4973.

January 6, 2009.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Saralee Evans, J.), entered June 25, 2008, which, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiff's motion for an interim award of attorney's fees, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Sanford I. Weisburst, New York, appellant pro se.

Chemtob Moss Forman Talbert, LLP, New York (Susan M. Moss of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Lippman, P.J., Mazzarelli, Sweeny, DeGrasse and Freedman, JJ.


The record does not show that defendant has significantly greater financial resources at her disposal than plaintiff has (Domestic Relations Law § 237 [a]; O'Shea v O'Shea, 93 NY2d 187, 190; Charpié v Charpié, 271 AD2d 169).

We have considered plaintiff's remaining contention and find it unavailing.


Summaries of

Weisburst v. Dreifus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 6, 2009
58 A.D.3d 402 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Weisburst v. Dreifus

Case Details

Full title:SANFORD I. WEISBURST, Appellant, v. JOANNA DREIFUS, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 6, 2009

Citations

58 A.D.3d 402 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 5
869 N.Y.S.2d 781

Citing Cases

Reyes v. City of N.Y.

Pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5), the Court may dismiss a cause of action as time barred under the applicable…

Osewall Gardens Associates v. White

[See generally Bruce Jordan, New York City Civil Court: Need Help Paying Rent, available at…