From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weinstein v. McGregor

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1923
119 S.E. 926 (N.C. 1923)

Opinion

(Filed 21 November, 1923.)

APPEAL by plaintiff from Harding, J., at June Term, 1923, of SCOTLAND.

J. E. Carpenter for plaintiff.

W. H. Weatherspoon and Cox Dunn for defendant.


Civil action tried upon the following issues:

"1. Is the defendant indebted to the plaintiff, and if so, in what amount? A. `Nothing.'

"2. Is the plaintiff indebted to the defendant, and if so, in what amount? A. `Nothing.'"

Judgment on the verdict, taxing the plaintiff with costs, from which he appeals.


The trial of this cause reduced itself to a controversy over issues of fact, which the jury alone could determine. A careful perusal of the record convinces us that the case has been tried substantially in accordance with the law bearing on the subject, and we have discovered no ruling or action on the part of the trial court which would seem to require another hearing. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.


Summaries of

Weinstein v. McGregor

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1923
119 S.E. 926 (N.C. 1923)
Case details for

Weinstein v. McGregor

Case Details

Full title:WEINSTEIN BROTHERS v. JOHN A. McGREGOR

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Nov 1, 1923

Citations

119 S.E. 926 (N.C. 1923)
119 S.E. 926

Citing Cases

Cowden et al. v. Crippen

The respondents' position is reduced to an absurdity by the following: Appellant having proceeded in a Regal…

Wolf v. O'Leary, Inc.

The question arises whether this instruction, read in [1] connection with the instruction referred to in…