From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weinstein v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1916
174 App. Div. 922 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

Opinion

July, 1916.


Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the ruling of the trial court at folios 367 and 368 was erroneous to the manifest and substantial prejudice of the plaintiff. (See Furst v. Second Avenue Railroad Co., 72 N.Y. 542.) Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred; Jenks, P.J., dissented.


Summaries of

Weinstein v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1916
174 App. Div. 922 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for

Weinstein v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:KATIE WEINSTEIN, Appellant, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1916

Citations

174 App. Div. 922 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)