From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weinraub v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Feb 29, 1916
103 S.C. 264 (S.C. 1916)

Opinion

9285

February 29, 1916.

Before HON. F.L. WILLCOX, special Judge, Abbeville, October, 1915. Affirmed.

Action by H. Weinraub against Southern Railway Company. From judgment of the Circuit Court modifying judgment rendered by magistrate, defendant appeals. It does not appear in the case how the point, as to failure of proof of value of goods shipped, was made before either the magistrate or Circuit Judge. The other facts are stated in the opinion.

Mr. J. Moore Mars, for appellant, submits: Penal statutes are strictly construed: 81 S.C. 167; 82 S.C. 242; 91 S.C. 377. Penalty limited to value of goods: 82 S.C. 180. Plaintiff must prove all requirements of statute: 30 Cyc. 1358.

Mr. Wm. N. Graydon, for respondent.


February 29, 1916. The opinion of the Court was delivered by


This was an action for damages in the magistrate's Court for failure to comply with the provisions of secs. 2568 and 2569, Code of Laws of South Carolina, vol. I, to deliver promptly a shipment of clothing from Charleston, S.C. to Calhoun Falls, S.C. The cause resulted in the magistrate's Court in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $25.00. An appeal was taken to the Circuit Court, and heard by the Hon. F.L. Willcox, special presiding Judge, who reduced the verdict to $20.00. After entry of judgment defendant appeals, and by three exceptions alleges error and seeks reversal.

At the hearing the appellant abandoned the first exception.

The two exceptions allege error on the part of the Court in not dismissing the complaint, as there was a failure to prove the value of the goods by the plaintiff, and no evidence to sustain the verdict. The exceptions are overruled. The case of Muckenfuss Mfg. Co. v. Railway Co., 82 S.C. 180, 63 S.E. 747, conclusively settles this point against the appellant's contention.

Judgment affirmed.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE GARY and MR. JUSTICE GAGE concur in the opinion announced by MR. JUSTICE WATTS.

MR. JUSTICE HYDRICK concurs in the result.

MR. JUSTICE FRASER concurs in the result for the reasons that neither the bill of lading nor its contents appear in the record, and it may show the necessary facts.


Summaries of

Weinraub v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Feb 29, 1916
103 S.C. 264 (S.C. 1916)
Case details for

Weinraub v. Southern Railway Co.

Case Details

Full title:WEINRAUB v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Feb 29, 1916

Citations

103 S.C. 264 (S.C. 1916)
87 S.E. 1009