From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weingart v. Pullman Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Mar 1, 1908
58 Misc. 187 (N.Y. App. Term 1908)

Summary

In Weingart v. Pullman Co. (58 Misc. 187) a passenger gave his coat to a porter as he was entering the train, and told him to put it on the seat he had engaged.

Summary of this case from Van Dike v. Pullman Co.

Opinion

March, 1908.

Alexander Green (Allan McCulloh, of counsel), for appellant.

Max J. Kohler, for respondent.


The plaintiff was the only witness called at the trial. He testified that, on May 22, 1905, he took passage on one of the Pennsylvania Railroad Company's cars from New York to Philadelphia, and also bought a ticket entitling him to occupy a parlor-car seat in one of defendant's cars attached to the Pennsylvania Railroad train, which train left Jersey City at seven-fourteen P.M. Just before entering the car, he gave his overcoat to defendant's porter and told the porter to put it on the seat plaintiff had engaged in defendant's said car. He followed the porter into the car and saw him place the overcoat on the said seat. Plaintiff then went into another car and remained about an hour and a half, when he returned to the seat in defendant's said car and found that his overcoat was gone. What became of the overcoat does not appear. Plaintiff sued for the loss of the same, stating its value to be fifty dollars, and the court below gave him judgment for fifty dollars damages and fourteen dollars and forty-one cents costs. Defendant appeals. The car in question was used as a day coach, not as a sleeping car; and the coat was not left in the care or custody of defendant's servant, but was placed by plaintiff's own order on the chair which plaintiff had engaged in said car. Under these circumstances, the mere unexplained disappearance of the coat did not establish defendant's liability; but it was incumbent on plaintiff to show negligence on the part of defendant. In the case at bar no evidence of such negligence was given. Wericher v. R.R. Co., 176 Mass. 275; Carpenter v. N.Y., N.H. H.R.R. Co., 124 N.Y. 53.

The judgment must be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Present: GILDERSLEEVE, BISCHOFF and MacLEAN, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event.


Summaries of

Weingart v. Pullman Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Mar 1, 1908
58 Misc. 187 (N.Y. App. Term 1908)

In Weingart v. Pullman Co. (58 Misc. 187) a passenger gave his coat to a porter as he was entering the train, and told him to put it on the seat he had engaged.

Summary of this case from Van Dike v. Pullman Co.
Case details for

Weingart v. Pullman Co.

Case Details

Full title:ISAAC WEINGART, Respondent, v . THE PULLMAN COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Mar 1, 1908

Citations

58 Misc. 187 (N.Y. App. Term 1908)
108 N.Y.S. 972

Citing Cases

Van Dike v. Pullman Co.

When the plaintiff got on the train a few minutes later, he did not find his bag. It was held that the…