From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weidman v. Tomaselli

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Dec 10, 1975
84 Misc. 2d 782 (N.Y. App. Term 1975)

Opinion

December 10, 1975

Appeal from the County Court of Rockland County, HARRY EDELSTEIN, J.

Dubbs, Leopold Davis, P.C. (Charles G. Davis of counsel), for appellant.

Lawrence H. Pearson for respondents.


MEMORANDUM.

Final judgment affirmed with $25 costs.

Upon review of the issues presented, this court agrees with the decision of the County Court ( 81 Misc.2d 328) that clause 32 of the lease is unconscionable. We find it unnecessary at this time to pass on the alternative bases suggested by the court below.

Concur: HOGAN P.J., GLICKMAN and FARLEY, JJ.


Summaries of

Weidman v. Tomaselli

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Dec 10, 1975
84 Misc. 2d 782 (N.Y. App. Term 1975)
Case details for

Weidman v. Tomaselli

Case Details

Full title:MARK WEIDMAN, as Agent for Spring Valley Garden Associates, Appellant, v…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Dec 10, 1975

Citations

84 Misc. 2d 782 (N.Y. App. Term 1975)
386 N.Y.S.2d 276

Citing Cases

Vernon Associates v. Brown

In the context of the landlord-tenant relationship as it relates to legal fees, a lease agreement has been…

MetLife Sec., Inc. v. Holt

The elements of a contract of adhesion are "(1) a necessity of life; (2) a contract for the excessive benefit…