From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wehringer v. Allen-Stevenson School

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 31, 1974
46 A.D.2d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Opinion

October 31, 1974


Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on July 5, 1974, denying the motion to dismiss the complaint unanimously reversed, on the law, and defendants' motion is granted. Appellants shall recover of respondent $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. The material alleged to be defamatory is not libelous per se (see Tracy v. Newsday, Inc., 5 N.Y.2d 134; Berkson v. Time, Inc., 8 A.D.2d 352, affd. 7 N.Y.2d 1007), and in the absence of special damages, the complaint cannot withstand defendants' motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd. [a], par. 7) for failure to state a cause of action. See O'Connell v. Press Pub. Co., 214 N.Y. 352, 358; Dauer Fittipaldi, Inc. v. Twenty First Century Communications, 43 A.D.2d 178, 179).

Concur — McGivern, P.J., Markewich, Nunez, Lupiano and Yesawich, JJ.


Summaries of

Wehringer v. Allen-Stevenson School

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 31, 1974
46 A.D.2d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)
Case details for

Wehringer v. Allen-Stevenson School

Case Details

Full title:HELEN M. WEHRINGER, Respondent, v. ALLEN-STEVENSON SCHOOL et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 31, 1974

Citations

46 A.D.2d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Citing Cases

Solinsky v. Arthritis Foundation

The significant distinction between the two types is that a prima facie case of libel per quod requires…

Plautz v. Eidlin-Quere

Plautz's complaint does not allege any of the four listed exceptions to satisfy defamation per se and…