From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Webster v. Wetzel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 18, 1999
262 A.D.2d 1038 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

June 18, 1999

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Cosgrove, J. — Summary Judgment.

PRESENT: DENMAN, P. J., PINE, WISNER, HURLBUTT AND CALLAHAN, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff seeks to recover damages for injuries he sustained when the rear gate of a dump truck gave way and released 10 tons of stone onto him. Supreme Court properly granted the motion of third-party defendant for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiff's cross motion for partial summary judgment on liability under Labor Law § 240 Lab. (1) and § 241 Lab. (6). We reject plaintiff's contention that the accident involved an elevation-related hazard covered by Labor Law § 240 Lab. (1) (see, Tillman v. Triou's Custom Homes, 253 A.D.2d 254 [decided Mar. 19, 1999]; Phelan v. State of New York, 238 A.D.2d 882, lv denied 90 N.Y.2d 812; Flihan v. Cornell Univ., 237 A.D.2d 921; cf., Orr v. Christa Constr., 206 A.D.2d 881). We also reject plaintiff's contention that 12 NYCRR 23-1.5 (c) is specific enough to support the Labor Law § 241 Lab. (6) claim (see, Ozzimo v. H.E.S., Inc., 249 A.D.2d 912; Dann v. City of Syracuse, 231 A.D.2d 855; Williams v. White Haven Mem. Park, 227 A.D.2d 923; contra, Gonzalez v. United Parcel Serv., 249 A.D.2d 210 ; McCormack v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 233 A.D.2d 203).


Summaries of

Webster v. Wetzel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 18, 1999
262 A.D.2d 1038 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Webster v. Wetzel

Case Details

Full title:DONALD J. WEBSTER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MICHAEL N. WETZEL, D/B/A MIKE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 18, 1999

Citations

262 A.D.2d 1038 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
691 N.Y.S.2d 848

Citing Cases

Prevete v. Costco Wholesale Corp.

Sections 23-1.5(a), (b) and (c) also set forth general safety standards. See Schwab v. A.J. Martini, Inc.,…

Franza v. London Terrace Gardens

Moreover, it is well settled that a violation of an OSHA regulation will not support a cause of action under…