From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Webb v. Kaiser

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Dec 17, 2015
627 F. App'x 625 (9th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 14-15882

12-17-2015

TRACY WEBB, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KAISER, (Fremont); et al., Defendants - Appellees.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 3:13-cv-04654-NC MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California
Nathanael M. Cousins, Magistrate Judge, Presiding Before: WALLACE, RAWLINSON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Webb consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Tracy Webb appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing her action alleging, among other things, sex and racial discrimination. We review de novo. Watison v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108, 1112 (9th Cir. 2012) (dismissal for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)); Brady v. United States, 211 F.3d 499, 502 (9th Cir. 2000) (dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Webb's action because Webb failed to allege facts establishing federal subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1332 (requirements for federal subject matter jurisdiction); see also Provincial Gov't of Marinduque v. Placer Dome, Inc., 582 F.3d 1083, 1086 (9th Cir. 2009) (discussing requirements for federal question jurisdiction under § 1331).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Webb v. Kaiser

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Dec 17, 2015
627 F. App'x 625 (9th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Webb v. Kaiser

Case Details

Full title:TRACY WEBB, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KAISER, (Fremont); et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Dec 17, 2015

Citations

627 F. App'x 625 (9th Cir. 2015)