From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Webb v. Hedge Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 18, 1909
133 App. Div. 420 (N.Y. App. Div. 1909)

Opinion

June 18, 1909.

E.W. McMahon [ Curtis Calvin Cooper and Charles Thaddeus Terry with him on the brief], for the appellant.

Charles Haldane [ Eugene P. Weed with him on the brief], for the respondent.


This appeal is from an order denying plaintiff's motion for a discovery and inspection of the books and papers of the defendant under the provisions of section 803 of the Code of Civil Procedure, for the purpose of enabling the plaintiff to prepare for trial.

The complaint alleges the breach of a contract by the defendant, which provided, among other things, that one Etheridge, the plaintiff's assignor, was to loan to defendant $5,000 for five years and that defendant was to employ Etheridge as its manager and treasurer for a period of five years at a fixed salary, and a fifteen-seventy-thirds share of the net profits of defendant's business each year, and a one-third share of the profits of all business secured by the said Etheridge for the defendant; that the contract was performed on the part of Etheridge for about three years, when he was wrongfully dismissed. It was shown by the moving papers that the dismissal was without previous notice and without an opportunity to secure information from defendant's books as to the amount of compensation due him under the contract; that the books are now in the possession of the defendant, and that an inspection can be had without serious inconvenience.

The defendant did a large business during the time of Etheridge's employment, and there is no way of showing the amount he was entitled to receive except by recourse to the books. Many of the matters now in dispute will undoubtedly be eliminated by an inspection, and we are of the opinion that the order should have been granted. We think, however, that there is no occasion to take the time plaintiff asks for the examination.

The order must be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the proceeding remitted to the Special Term, with instructions to make a proper order for the inspection of defendant's books.

HIRSCHBERG, P.J., JENKS, GAYNOR and MILLER, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with costs. Proceedings remitted to the Special Term for the imposition of such restrictions on the examination as may be proper.


Summaries of

Webb v. Hedge Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 18, 1909
133 App. Div. 420 (N.Y. App. Div. 1909)
Case details for

Webb v. Hedge Co.

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN F. WEBB, Appellant, v . THE HOMER W. HEDGE COMPANY, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 18, 1909

Citations

133 App. Div. 420 (N.Y. App. Div. 1909)
117 N.Y.S. 643

Citing Cases

Sinclair Rfg. Co. v. Jenkins Co.

In such circumstances damages may be proved with the aid of a discovery, if the complication of accounts or…

Schreier v. Mascola

v Papazoglou, 69 A.D.2d 855; Lo Verde v Interex Design Equip. Corp., 54 A.D.2d 1090; Alderman v Eagle, supra;…