From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wear v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jul 6, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-901 (W.D. Pa. Jul. 6, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-901

07-06-2012

ANGELA A. WEAR, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


Judge Mark R. Hornak

Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan


MEMORANDUM ORDER

Angela A. Wear ("Plaintiff) brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking review of the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security ("Defendant" or "Commissioner") denying her application for disability insurance benefits ("DIB") under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C, §§ 401 - 433. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Local Rules of Court 72.C and 72.D.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 16), filed on April 30, 2012, recommended that Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 12) be denied and Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 14) be granted. Service was made on all counsel of record. The parties were informed that in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), and Rule 72.D.2 of the Local Rules of Court, that they had fourteen (14) days to file any objections.

Plaintiff filed objections (ECF No. 17) to the Report and Recommendation on May 15, 2012. After review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and objections thereto, the following Order is entered:

AND NOW, this 6th day of July, 2012,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 16) of United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan, dated April 30, 2012, is adopted as the opinion of the Court. In particular, the Court notes that the Report and Recommendation sets forth that the Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") considered the Plaintiff's history of headaches when formulating his residual functional capacity assessment at "Step 5" of the standard disability analysis. Further, as recited by the Magistrate Judge, the record as to the severity of Plaintiffs headaches is, at best, equivocal, and to the extent the ALJ did not consider them to be severe under "Step 2" of that disability analysis, the substantial evidence of record supports that conclusion.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Angela A. Wear (ECF No. 12) is DENIED, and the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED, pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Commissioner of Social Security and against Plaintiff pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the case marked closed.

______________________

Mark R. Hornak

United States District Judge
cc/ecf: All counsel of record.


Summaries of

Wear v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jul 6, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-901 (W.D. Pa. Jul. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Wear v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:ANGELA A. WEAR, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jul 6, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-901 (W.D. Pa. Jul. 6, 2012)

Citing Cases

Lance M. v. Kijakazi

Other courts, however, recognize that proceeding with the evaluation process makes a Step-Two error more…