From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Weakley v. Homeland Sec. Solutions, Inc.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 19, 2015
622 F. App'x 253 (4th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 15-1787

11-19-2015

DOUGLAS WEAKLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HOMELAND SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee.

Douglas Weakley, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Alan Abel, David Sutton Hirschler, III, WILLCOX & SAVAGE, PC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:14-cv-00785-REP-RCY) Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Douglas Weakley, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Alan Abel, David Sutton Hirschler, III, WILLCOX & SAVAGE, PC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Douglas Weakley appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Weakley v. Homeland Sec. Sols., Inc., No. 3:14-cv-00785-REP-RCY (E.D. Va. filed June 16, 2015; entered June 17, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Weakley v. Homeland Sec. Solutions, Inc.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Nov 19, 2015
622 F. App'x 253 (4th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Weakley v. Homeland Sec. Solutions, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DOUGLAS WEAKLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HOMELAND SECURITY SOLUTIONS…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 19, 2015

Citations

622 F. App'x 253 (4th Cir. 2015)

Citing Cases

Williams v. PrimeCare Med.

However, no such references appear in the amended complaint and generally a party may not amend their…

Smith v. DuPont Specialty Prods. U.S.

The Court does not consider any new facts Smith asserts in his response brief because “the complaint may not…