From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watts v. Seward School Board

U.S.
Jun 3, 1968
391 U.S. 592 (1968)

Summary

explaining that law of the case doctrine, which prohibits reconsideration of issues that have been explicitly or inherently adjudicated in previous appeal, promotes judicial economy by "narrowing down the issues in successive stages of litigation"

Summary of this case from State v. Carlson

Opinion

CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ALASKA.

No. 325.

Argued March 26, 1968. Decided June 3, 1968.

421 P.2d 586, 423 P.2d 678, vacated and remanded.

George Kaufmann argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioners.

Theodore M. Pease, Jr., argued the cause and filed a brief for respondents.


The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Alaska for further consideration in light of Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205, Will County, ante, p. 563.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, with whom MR. JUSTICE BLACK joins, would reverse the judgment outright for the reasons stated by him in Pickering v. Board of Education, ante, p. 575.

MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissents.


Summaries of

Watts v. Seward School Board

U.S.
Jun 3, 1968
391 U.S. 592 (1968)

explaining that law of the case doctrine, which prohibits reconsideration of issues that have been explicitly or inherently adjudicated in previous appeal, promotes judicial economy by "narrowing down the issues in successive stages of litigation"

Summary of this case from State v. Carlson
Case details for

Watts v. Seward School Board

Case Details

Full title:WATTS ET AL. v . SEWARD SCHOOL BOARD ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 3, 1968

Citations

391 U.S. 592 (1968)

Citing Cases

Williams v. School Dist. of Springfield R-12

The Shelton case is a non-re-employment case in a non-tenure State and yet the United States Supreme Court…

State v. Carlson

Because it could have been raised in earlier appeals but was not, and because it therefore falls outside the…