From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watson v. Storrs

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Nov 20, 1934
175 A. 263 (Md. 1934)

Opinion

[No. 44, October Term, 1934.]

Decided November 20th, 1934.

Street Car — Injury to Pedestrian — Contributory Negligence

A pedestrian who, though seeing a street car approaching, sixty-five feet away, attempted to cross the street, in front of the car, walking slowly, was guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law.

Decided November 20th, 1934.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City (DUKE BOND, J.).

Action by Ernest Watson, by Rebecca Jones, his guardian and next friend, against Lucius S. Storrs and William H. Meese, Receivers for the United Railways and Electric Company of Baltimore. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

The cause was argued before BOND, C.J., URNER, ADKINS, OFFUTT, PARKE, and SLOAN, JJ.

Howard A. Sweeten and Everett L. Buckmaster, with whom were Benjamin N. Kline and Weinberg Sweeten on the brief, for the appellant.

James J. Lindsay, with whom was Philip S. Ball on the brief, for the appellees.


Unreported cases.


Summaries of

Watson v. Storrs

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Nov 20, 1934
175 A. 263 (Md. 1934)
Case details for

Watson v. Storrs

Case Details

Full title:ERNEST WATSON v . LUCIUS S. STORRS ET AL., RECEIVERS

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Nov 20, 1934

Citations

175 A. 263 (Md. 1934)
175 A. 263

Citing Cases

State v. Capital Transit Co.

"Both are bound to exercise reasonable care". Consolidated Ry. Co. v. Rifcowitz, 89 Md. 338, at page 341, 43…

Phillips v. Baltimore Transit Co.

Both are bound to exercise reasonable care." Caryl v. Baltimore Transit Co., 190 Md. 162, 170, 58 A.2d 239,…