From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watson v. Shell Oil Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jan 25, 1994
53 F.3d 663 (5th Cir. 1994)

Summary

finding common questions arising from an oil refinery explosion that injured more than 18,000 plaintiffs

Summary of this case from Plaisance v. BP Exploration & Prod. Inc. (In re Oil Spill by the Oil Rig "Deepwater Horizon" in the Gulf of Mex., on April 20, 2010)

Opinion

No. 91-3449.

January 25, 1994.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. Henry A. Mentz, Jr., Judge.

PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion December 7, 1992, 5 Cir., 1992, 979 F.2d 1014)

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, E. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

Judges King and Duhe are recused and therefore did not participate in this order.

Prior report: 136 F.R.D. 588.


IT IS ORDERED that the joint motion of appellants, Shell Oil Company and Brown Root, U.S.A., Inc. and appellees, the plaintiffs' Legal Committee, to dismiss these interlocutory appeals presently pending for rehearing en banc, with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs, is granted.


Summaries of

Watson v. Shell Oil Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jan 25, 1994
53 F.3d 663 (5th Cir. 1994)

finding common questions arising from an oil refinery explosion that injured more than 18,000 plaintiffs

Summary of this case from Plaisance v. BP Exploration & Prod. Inc. (In re Oil Spill by the Oil Rig "Deepwater Horizon" in the Gulf of Mex., on April 20, 2010)

affirming and "express[ing] [its] admiration" for the district court's trial plan, which included three damages phases and allowed the district court to adjudicate common class issues in the first phase and alter adjudicate individualized issues in later phases, despite due process challenge

Summary of this case from In re Chinese-Manufactured Drywall Prods. Liab. Litig.
Case details for

Watson v. Shell Oil Co.

Case Details

Full title:TROY WATSON, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. SHELL OIL COMPANY, AND BROWN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Jan 25, 1994

Citations

53 F.3d 663 (5th Cir. 1994)

Citing Cases

Philip Morris Incorporated v. Angeletti

Jenkins v. Raymark Industries, 782 F.2d 468, 472 (5th Cir. 1986). See also Watson v. Shell Oil Co., 979 F.2d…

United States v. Kealy

By the way, after the Eleventh Circuit reversed me in this case, the Defendant withdrew his Section 2255…