From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watson v. Geithner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Aug 8, 2013
11 Civ. 9527 (AJN)(HBP) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 8, 2013)

Opinion

11 Civ. 9527 (AJN)(HBP)

08-08-2013

ROSETTA WATSON, Plaintiff, v. TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, Defendant.


OPINION

AND ORDER

PITMAN, United States Magistrate Judge:

Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to serve and file her opposition to defendant's motion for summary judgment (Docket Item 24) is denied as moot. Plaintiff filed her opposition or about February 25, 2013 and it has been considered in connection with the Report and Recommendation issued on this date. Dated: New York, New York

August 8, 2013

SO ORDERED

_____________

HENRY PITMAN

United States Magistrate Judge
Copies mailed to: Ms. Rosetta Watson Sarah S. Normand, Esq.
Assistant United States Attorney


Summaries of

Watson v. Geithner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Aug 8, 2013
11 Civ. 9527 (AJN)(HBP) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Watson v. Geithner

Case Details

Full title:ROSETTA WATSON, Plaintiff, v. TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Aug 8, 2013

Citations

11 Civ. 9527 (AJN)(HBP) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 8, 2013)

Citing Cases

Rivers v. N.Y.C. Hous. Auth.

Title VII discrimination cases treat counseling memoranda differently. See Watson v. Geithner , No.…

Paupaw-Myrie v. Mount Vernon City Sch. Dist.

Similarly, neither the "higher scrutiny" that Plaintiff allegedly experienced nor the counseling memos she…