From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watmet, Inc. v. Robinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 29, 1988
136 A.D.2d 947 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

January 29, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Niagara County, Cook, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Doerr, Denman, Green and Pine, JJ.


Order unanimously modified on the law to grant plaintiff's motion to consolidate actions Nos. 1 and 2 for a joint trial in Niagara County and, as modified affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Special Term's award of counsel fees pursuant to CPLR 6315 was proper even though defendant's application was brought on by ordinary notice of motion rather than by an order to show cause. The motion requirement in CPLR 6315 is to insure that all "interested persons" receive notice of the application. It is undisputed that plaintiff had actual notice of the application for counsel fees and, in fact, submitted papers in opposition to the motion. However, it was an improvident exercise of discretion for Special Term to deny plaintiff's motion to consolidate actions Nos. 1 and 2 for trial in Niagara County, as the two pending actions involve common questions of law and fact (see, Business Council v Cooney, 102 A.D.2d 1001; Williams v Mascitti, 71 A.D.2d 813).


Summaries of

Watmet, Inc. v. Robinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 29, 1988
136 A.D.2d 947 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Watmet, Inc. v. Robinson

Case Details

Full title:WATMET, INC., Appellant, v. RICHARD ROBINSON, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 29, 1988

Citations

136 A.D.2d 947 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)