From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Watersview Owners v. Pacimeo

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 17, 2006
13 Misc. 3d 130 (N.Y. App. Term 2006)

Summary

In Watersview, supra, the issue revolved around a proceeding against a cooperative lessee, who clearly possessed a tenancy interest.

Summary of this case from Diamond Ridge Partners LLC v. Hanspal

Opinion

August 17, 2006.


Judgments — Default Judgment — Vacatur.


Summaries of

Watersview Owners v. Pacimeo

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 17, 2006
13 Misc. 3d 130 (N.Y. App. Term 2006)

In Watersview, supra, the issue revolved around a proceeding against a cooperative lessee, who clearly possessed a tenancy interest.

Summary of this case from Diamond Ridge Partners LLC v. Hanspal
Case details for

Watersview Owners v. Pacimeo

Case Details

Full title:Watersview Owners, Inc. v. Pacimeo

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 17, 2006

Citations

13 Misc. 3d 130 (N.Y. App. Term 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 51805

Citing Cases

Yen-Ching Chen v. Dickerson

Accordingly, the motion by tenant Robert Dickerson to vacate the final judgment and dismiss the petition must…

Portnoy v. Golger

As such, the action was not subject to transfer pursuant to CPLR 325 (d). Thus, all proceedings taken in the…