From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washington v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 1, 1989
378 S.E.2d 381 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

77558.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 1, 1989.

Aggravated assault. Chatham Superior Court. Before Judge Head.

Kenneth D. Kondritzer, for appellant.

Spencer Lawton, Jr., District Attorney, for appellee.


Appellant was tried before a jury on a two-count indictment. Count One alleged, in relevant part, that appellant "did unlawfully and with malice aforethought cause the death of [the victim], a human being, by blows to the head. . . ." Count Two alleged, in relevant part, that appellant "did, while in the commission of a felony, to wit: Aggravated Assault, cause the death of [the victim], a human being by beating said human being about the head. . . ." The trial court, without request, charged on aggravated assault with a deadly weapon as a lesser included offense. The jury returned a verdict of guilty of aggravated assault. After the denial of his motion for new trial, appellant filed this appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence entered on the jury's verdict of guilty.

Appellant's sole enumeration of error is that "[a]s the indictment failed to charge a necessary element of the offense of aggravated assault, the offense of which appellant was found guilty was not [a] lesser included [offense] of the offense charged." It is unclear from this enumeration exactly how it is that appellant contends the trial court erred. The record shows that appellant filed neither a pre-trial demurrer to the indictment nor a post-judgment motion in arrest of the judgment of conviction. Compare Phillips v. State, 240 Ga. 453 ( 241 S.E.2d 203) (1978); Rushin v. State, 180 Ga. App. 276 (1) ( 348 S.E.2d 910) (1986); Ponder v. State, 121 Ga. App. 788 ( 175 S.E.2d 55) (1970); Martin v. State, 96 Ga. App. 557, 558 (1) ( 100 S.E.2d 645) (1957). Accordingly, appellant's contention presumably is that it was error for the trial court to charge on aggravated assault with a deadly weapon as a lesser included offense of malice or felony murder.

"The trial judge. . . may, of his own volition and in his discretion, charge on a lesser crime of that included in the indictment or accusation." State v. Stonaker, 236 Ga. 1, 2 (2) ( 222 S.E.2d 354) (1976). "`The general rule concerning lesser included offenses appears to be: "To warrant conviction of a lesser offense on an indictment or information charging a greater offense, it is essential that the allegations describing the greater offense contain all essential averments relating to the lesser offense or that the greater offense necessarily include all the essential ingredients of the lesser."' [Cit.]" (Emphasis supplied.) Tuggle v. State, 145 Ga. App. 603 (1) ( 244 S.E.2d 131) (1978). In the present case, it is clear that the crime of aggravated assault was "necessarily" a lesser included offense at least as to the felony murder count. That count of the indictment specifically alleged that appellant's commission of an "aggravated assault" against the victim by "beating [him] about the head" was the underlying felony. Accordingly, the greater offense of felony murder "necessarily" included the offense of aggravated assault. See Atkins v. Hopper, 234 Ga. 330, 333 (3) ( 216 S.E.2d 89) (1975). Compare Anderson v. State, 170 Ga. App. 634 ( 317 S.E.2d 877) (1984) (simple battery not necessarily a lesser included offense in the crime of aggravated assault); Porter v. State, 163 Ga. App. 511, 512 (1) ( 295 S.E.2d 179) (1982) (criminal interference with governmental property not necessarily a lesser included offense in the crime of criminal damage to property); Tuggle v. State, supra (simple battery not necessarily a lesser included offense in the crime of aggravated assault). If appellant wished to contest the sufficiency of the indictment's allegations concerning his commission of the underlying aggravated assault against the victim, he could have filed a pre-trial demurrer. See Phillips v. State, supra; Rushin v. State, supra; Martin v. State, supra. As noted, however, he did not do so.

The evidence clearly authorized a finding that appellant had beaten the victim about the head with either a rock or with his fists and, thus, had committed an aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. See Harper v. State, 152 Ga. App. 689, 691 (2) ( 263 S.E.2d 547) (1979). It follows that the trial court correctly charged on aggravated assault with a deadly weapon as a lesser included offense of murder. See generally Hall v. State, 163 Ga. App. 515 (1) ( 295 S.E.2d 194) (1982).

Judgment affirmed. Deen, P. J., and Sognier, J., concur.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 1, 1989.


Summaries of

Washington v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 1, 1989
378 S.E.2d 381 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Washington v. State

Case Details

Full title:WASHINGTON v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Feb 1, 1989

Citations

378 S.E.2d 381 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989)
378 S.E.2d 381

Citing Cases

Whitener v. State

After observing the large bulges in Whitener's pockets that Whitener identified as rocks, the officer was…

Ross v. State

Where the greater offense charged includes all the essential averments of the lesser offense, the lesser…