From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washington v. Ryan

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Dec 31, 2015
811 F.3d 299 (9th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

Nos. 05–99009 07–15536.

12-31-2015

Theodore WASHINGTON, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Charles L. RYAN, Respondent–Appellee.

Gilbert Henry Levy, Law Offices of Gilbert H. Levy, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner–Appellant. Laura Chiasson, Esquire, Assistant Attorney General, AGAZ–Office of the Arizona Attorney General, Tucson, AZ, for Respondent–Appellee.


Gilbert Henry Levy, Law Offices of Gilbert H. Levy, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner–Appellant.

Laura Chiasson, Esquire, Assistant Attorney General, AGAZ–Office of the Arizona Attorney General, Tucson, AZ, for Respondent–Appellee.

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35–3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges MURGUIA and HURWITZ did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.


Summaries of

Washington v. Ryan

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Dec 31, 2015
811 F.3d 299 (9th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Washington v. Ryan

Case Details

Full title:THEODORE WASHINGTON, Petitioner - Appellant, v. CHARLES L. RYAN…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Dec 31, 2015

Citations

811 F.3d 299 (9th Cir. 2015)
16 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 20

Citing Cases

Washington v. Shinn

We then granted Washington's motion for en banc rehearing. Washington v. Ryan , 811 F.3d 299 (9th Cir. 2015).…

Washington v. Ryan

The court then granted Washington’s motion for en banc rehearing. Washington v. Ryan , 811 F.3d 299 (9th Cir.…