From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washington v. Recuenco

U.S.
Oct 17, 2005
546 U.S. 960 (2005)

Summary

In Recuenco, the "question presented... is whether error as to the definition of a sentencing enhancement should be subject to harmless error analysis where it is shown beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not contribute to the verdict on the enhancement."

Summary of this case from Robertson v. U.S.

Opinion

No. 05-83.

October 17, 2005.


Certiorari Granted

Sup. Ct. Wash. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted. Reported below: 154 Wash. 2d 156, 110 P. 3d 188.


Summaries of

Washington v. Recuenco

U.S.
Oct 17, 2005
546 U.S. 960 (2005)

In Recuenco, the "question presented... is whether error as to the definition of a sentencing enhancement should be subject to harmless error analysis where it is shown beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not contribute to the verdict on the enhancement."

Summary of this case from Robertson v. U.S.
Case details for

Washington v. Recuenco

Case Details

Full title:WASHINGTON v. RECUENCO

Court:U.S.

Date published: Oct 17, 2005

Citations

546 U.S. 960 (2005)
126 S. Ct. 478

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Salas

In fact, however, certiorari was sought and granted in that case to determine "whether error as to the…

U.S. v. Davis

See Washington v. Recuenco, 110 P.3d 188 (Wash. 2005), cert. granted, 74 U.S.L.W. 3246 (U.S. Oct. 17, 2005)…