From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Washburn v. Wilkinson

Supreme Court of California
Nov 1, 1881
59 Cal. 538 (Cal. 1881)

Opinion

         Department One

         Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial in the Superior Court of Sacramento County. Denson, J.

         The action was brought to foreclose four mortgages, one of which contained the provision that the mortgagors should keep the improvements on the mortgaged premises insured for two thirds of their cash value, and that upon their default in doing so the mortgagee might cause the same to be insured at the expense of the mortgagors, and that the mortgagors would, on demand, repay the mortgagee all sums which might be paid for any insurance on the premises, and that the mortgage should stand as security for the repayment of such sums. The amended complaint was filed August 26, 1880, and contains no allegations with reference to payments on account of insurance. On the trial two policies of insurance, dated respectively September 6, 1880, and September 4, 1881, were admitted in evidence over the objection of the defendants that the same were irrelevant and not authorized by the several mortgages described in the complaint, and were issued after this action was commenced; and the plaintiff testified that she had paid the premiums mentioned in the two policies, amounting to the sum of two hundred and thirteen dollars and fifty-five cents, and this sum was allowed in the findings and in the judgment.

         COUNSEL

          J. H. McKune, for Appellants.

          Curtis & Clunie and F. H. Moore, for Respondent.


         OPINION          The Court:

         It is not averred in the complaint that the mortgagor failed to keep the mortgaged property insured, or that the mortgagee conformed to the power contained in the mortgage in respect to the insurance. Neither is there any evidence of any insurance money having been paid by the mortgagee prior to the commencement of the action; besides, there is no supplemental complaint averring any payment of insurance since such commencement. It was, therefore, error for the Court to allow the plaintiff the amount paid by her for insurance.

         Cause remanded, with instructions to modify the decree in accordance with this opinion.


Summaries of

Washburn v. Wilkinson

Supreme Court of California
Nov 1, 1881
59 Cal. 538 (Cal. 1881)
Case details for

Washburn v. Wilkinson

Case Details

Full title:LORINDA WASHBURN v. THOMAS S. WILKINSON et Ux.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Nov 1, 1881

Citations

59 Cal. 538 (Cal. 1881)

Citing Cases

Strickler Co. v. Eisner

While our attention has not been called to a precedent in which the courts of this state have had occasion to…

Galliano v. Kilfoy

This was erroneous; a copy of the supplemental complaint should have been served upon appellant after it was…