From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wash House v. Tucker

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 5, 1982
413 So. 2d 813 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. AF-18.

May 5, 1982.

Petition for review from the Deputy Commissioner.

Bruce R. Kaster of McClellan, Kaster Vostrejs, P.A., Ocala, for appellants/cross-appellees.

Terence J. Kann of Barton, Cox Davis, Gainesville, for appellee/cross-appellant.


Appellants seek review of an order finding the claimant/appellee, Linda F. Tucker, to have sustained a 5% permanent impairment as a result of her industrial accident, which occurred on April 17, 1980. Appellants claim that there is no evidence to suggest that her impairment rating is based upon the American Medical Association's Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, as required by Section 440.15(3), Florida Statutes (1979). However, we decline to reach this issue.

Although the deputy commissioner did make a finding that the claimant had sustained a 5% permanent partial disability to the body as a whole, his order does not reflect an award of workers' compensation benefits. Therefore, the order is not a final order. The applicable procedural rules, Rules 9.030(b)(1)(B) and 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iv), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, do not authorize direct review by this court of non-final orders of a deputy commissioner. See United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. Sloan, 410 So.2d 549 (Fla. 1st DCA, 1982). Consequently, we dismiss the employer/carrier's appeal for lack of jurisdiction, because it attempts to appeal a nonappealable interlocutory order.

Appellee's timely cross-appeal as to the propriety of an award of temporary disability benefits after June 1, 1980, is cognizable by this court as a final order denying the claim for these benefits. Because there is substantial competent evidence to support the deputy commissioner's determinations in this matter, we decline to reweigh the evidence. Croft v. Pinkerton-Hayes Lumber Co., 386 So.2d 535, 537 (Fla. 1980).

Accordingly, appellee's cross-appeal is AFFIRMED, and appellants' direct appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Our dismissal is without prejudice to review of the order in the event of appeal from a final order awarding permanent impairment or wage loss benefits pursuant to Section 440.15(3), Florida Statutes (1979).

ERVIN, SHIVERS and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wash House v. Tucker

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 5, 1982
413 So. 2d 813 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

Wash House v. Tucker

Case Details

Full title:THE WASH HOUSE AND SOUTH CAROLINA INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: May 5, 1982

Citations

413 So. 2d 813 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

St. Dept., Health Rehab. v. Waters

We are without jurisdiction to review this nonfinal order. See Mills Electrical Contractors v. Marthens, 417…

Venice Hosp. v. Nelson

The issue of average weekly wage was ripe for determination. Thus, the order does not resolve all matured…