From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wardlaw v. Rural Com. Ins. Ser. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, El Dorado Division
Oct 21, 2010
Civil No. 1:10-cv-01004 (W.D. Ark. Oct. 21, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 1:10-cv-01004.

October 21, 2010


ORDER


Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed September 27, 2010 by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 25. Judge Bryant recommends that Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings (ECF No. 9) and Defendants' Motion for Protective Order to Stay Discovery and Disclosure Requirements (ECF No. 14) be granted. The parties have not filed objections to this Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in toto.

Accordingly, it is ordered that the above-styled and numbered matter is administratively terminated without prejudice to the right of the parties to reopen the proceedings for good cause shown for entry of any stipulation or order, or for any other purpose required to obtain a final determination in the litigation. All motions previously referred to the Magistrate Judge should be returned to the District Court and administratively terminated.

IT IS SO ORDERED, this 21st day of October, 2010.


Summaries of

Wardlaw v. Rural Com. Ins. Ser. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, El Dorado Division
Oct 21, 2010
Civil No. 1:10-cv-01004 (W.D. Ark. Oct. 21, 2010)
Case details for

Wardlaw v. Rural Com. Ins. Ser. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:GUY MARTIN WARDLAW et al. PLAINTIFFS v. RURAL COMMUNITY INSURANCE SERVICES…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, El Dorado Division

Date published: Oct 21, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 1:10-cv-01004 (W.D. Ark. Oct. 21, 2010)

Citing Cases

Occidental Fire & Cas. Co. v. Bush

9 U.S.C. § 2. See also In re 2000 Sugar Beet Crop Ins. Litig., 228 F.Supp.2d 992, 995 (D. Minn. 2002)…

Ackerman v. U.S. Dep't of Agric.

Federal courts have consistently held that the arbitration provisions of the Basic Provisions of the Common…