From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ward v. Vogel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Aug 20, 2014
Civ. Action No. 13-1411 (ESH) (D.D.C. Aug. 20, 2014)

Opinion

Civ. Action No. 13-1411 (ESH)

08-20-2014

MILTON N. WARD III, Plaintiff, v. STEPHEN VOGEL, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, sues Stephen Vogel, a former officer of the District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department (MPD), under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He claims that Vogel searched his automobile while investigating a traffic accident in violation of the Fourth Amendment's proscription against unreasonable searches and seizures. (See Compl. [Dkt. # 4].)

A claim under § 1983 is properly brought against the individual wrongdoer in his personal capacity. See Hafer v. Melo, 502 U.S. 21, 25 (1991) ("Personal-capacity suits . . . seek to impose individual liability upon a government officer for actions taken under color of state law."); Brown v. Wilhelm, 819 F. Supp. 2d 41, 43 (D.D.C. 2011) (§ 1983 claims "are cognizable against the individual in his or her personal capacity only") (citing Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1948 (2009); Simpkins v. District of Columbia Gov't, 108 F.3d 366, 369 (D.C. Cir. 1997)). To render a judgment against a defendant in a § 1983 case, the Court must obtain personal jurisdiction. Hence, "[w]ithout valid service of summons or a waiver of service, the Court cannot establish proper venue and personal jurisdiction over the defendants, and the case may not proceed." Pollard v. District of Columbia, 285 F.R.D. 125, 127 (D.D.C. 2012) (quoting Mann v. Castiel, 729 F. Supp. 2d 191, 196 (D.D.C. 2010)).

The record shows that since January 6, 2014, the court officers have made efforts to serve Vogel with process at the addresses plaintiff has provided and at a last known address submitted in camera by MPD's General Counsel. On August 8, 2014, the Court was notified that the Marshals Service has made four attempts to serve defendant at the last known address without success. Hence, the Court has no choice but to dismiss this case without prejudice. A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

The return of service will be filed with defendant's address information redacted.

/s/_________

ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE

United States District Judge
DATE: August 20, 2014


Summaries of

Ward v. Vogel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Aug 20, 2014
Civ. Action No. 13-1411 (ESH) (D.D.C. Aug. 20, 2014)
Case details for

Ward v. Vogel

Case Details

Full title:MILTON N. WARD III, Plaintiff, v. STEPHEN VOGEL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Aug 20, 2014

Citations

Civ. Action No. 13-1411 (ESH) (D.D.C. Aug. 20, 2014)

Citing Cases

Plummer v. Ochsenschlager

See ECF No. 6. On January 16, 2019, the Court ordered Mr. Plummer to provide the full name and address for…