From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ward v. Estes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Sep 21, 2018
Case No. 1:17-cv-00944-CL (D. Or. Sep. 21, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 1:17-cv-00944-CL

09-21-2018

PATRICK WARD and BIANCA WARD and AS NEXT BEST FRIEND R.W., Plaintiffs, v. KADI ESTES, CHARLEY TRACY, JEANETTE GRANT, ST. CHARLES HEALTH SYSTEM INC., dba ST. CHARLES MEDICAL CENTER, Defendants.


ORDER :

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 48), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Plaintiffs filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, I have reviewed the file of this case de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). I find no error and conclude the report is correct.

It is clear exigent circumstances justified the State of Oregon's Department of Human Services ("DHS") child protective services workers' decision to remove newborn R.W. from Plaintiffs' custody. Both Mr. and Mrs. Ward were under indictment for crimes related to child abuse at the time of R.W.'s birth, and DHS had already taken custody of Mrs. Ward's elder two children from a previous relationship and placed them with their biological father. DHS placed R.W. in protective custody due to the threat of abuse from both parents, and not because of the presumptive positive methamphetamine test that Plaintiffs allege formed the basis for DHS' jurisdiction.

In any event, the State Defendants are entitled to qualified immunity because they reasonably believed their actions were lawful. See ORS 419B.150(1). Likewise, I agree with Judge Clarke that Plaintiffs fail to demonstrate a genuine dispute of material fact as to their wrongful removal claims against Defendant St. Charles. Therefore, Defendants are entitled to summary judgment.

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 48) is adopted in full. State Defendants' motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 16) and St. Charles' motion for summary judgment by joinder (ECF No. 34) are GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 21st day of September, 2018.

/s/ Michael J. McShane

Michael McShane

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Ward v. Estes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Sep 21, 2018
Case No. 1:17-cv-00944-CL (D. Or. Sep. 21, 2018)
Case details for

Ward v. Estes

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK WARD and BIANCA WARD and AS NEXT BEST FRIEND R.W., Plaintiffs, v…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Sep 21, 2018

Citations

Case No. 1:17-cv-00944-CL (D. Or. Sep. 21, 2018)

Citing Cases

Shyrer v. Or. Dep't of Human Servs. Child Welfare

. 1:17-CV-00944-CL, 2018 WL 4559008, at *2 (D. Or. Aug. 17, 2018), (citing Miller v. Gammie, 335 F.3d 889,…