Summary
holding that "[t]he failure to provide a single [kosher] meal is insufficient to allege a constitutional violation"
Summary of this case from Rutherford v. Westchester Cnty.Opinion
9:06-CV-1429.
January 13, 2009
KENNETH WARD, Plaintiff, Pro Se, Rochester, NY.
JAMES B. McGOWAN, ESQ., ADRIENNE J. KERWIN, ESQ., RISA L. VIGLUCCI, ESQ., HON. ANDREW M. CUOMO, Attorney General of the Attorney for the Defendants, Department of Law, The Capitol, Albany, NY.
DECISION and ORDER
Plaintiff, Kenneth Ward, brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By Report-Recommendation dated December 1, 2008, the Honorable David R. Homer, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted as to all claims and all defendants. No objections to the Report-Recommendation have been filed.
Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of Magistrate Judge Homer, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects.See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1).
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that
1. The defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED;
2. The plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED as to all claims and all defendants; and
3. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.