From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wanner v. Hornbeck Hinton, Incorporated

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jan 13, 1921
114 A. 926 (Md. 1921)

Opinion

Decided January 13th, 1921.

Dismissal of Appeal.

The burden is on the appellant to show that the delay in transmitting the record to the Court of Appeals was due to the neglect or inability of the clerk or to the appellee.

Decided January 13th, 1921.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City (SOPER, C.J.).

The cause was argued before BRISCOE, THOMAS, URNER, STOCKBRIDGE, ADKINS, and OFFUTT, JJ.

Christopher R. Wattenscheidt and Laurie H. Riggs, for the appellant.

Lee I. Hecht, for the appellee.


Per curiam opinion


Summaries of

Wanner v. Hornbeck Hinton, Incorporated

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jan 13, 1921
114 A. 926 (Md. 1921)
Case details for

Wanner v. Hornbeck Hinton, Incorporated

Case Details

Full title:EMANUEL WANNER vs . HORNBECK HINTON, INCORPORATED

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Jan 13, 1921

Citations

114 A. 926 (Md. 1921)
137 Md. 694

Citing Cases

Brinsfield v. Mather

Cases supra; Bliss v. Bliss et al., Committee, 133 Md. 68, 104 A. 467. But where the record is transmitted…