From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wang v. Lynch

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jan 27, 2016
631 F. App'x 481 (9th Cir. 2016)

Opinion

No. 14-71163

01-27-2016

LI WANG, Petitioner, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

Agency No. A205-175-733 MEMORANDUM On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Li Wang, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge's ("IJ") order denying her motion to reconsider the denial of her second motion to reopen removal proceedings conducted in absentia. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Wang's unexhausted contentions regarding address discrepancies between the address she claims she gave to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and the address to which the immigration court mailed correspondence regarding her case. See Tijani v. Holder, 628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th Cir. 2010) ("We lack jurisdiction to review legal claims not presented in an alien's administrative proceedings before the BIA."). To the extent Wang contends the IJ was biased, we likewise lack jurisdiction to consider that unexhausted contention. See id.

We deny Wang's motion to take judicial notice of documents outside the administrative record. See Lising v. INS, 124 F.3d 996, 998 (9th Cir. 1997) (explaining standard for review of out-of-record evidence).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Wang v. Lynch

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jan 27, 2016
631 F. App'x 481 (9th Cir. 2016)
Case details for

Wang v. Lynch

Case Details

Full title:LI WANG, Petitioner, v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 27, 2016

Citations

631 F. App'x 481 (9th Cir. 2016)