stating that even after amending claims, when the gravamen of claims asserted is completely preempted by ERISA, a district court still has jurisdiction
Summary of this case from Lodi Mem'l Hosp. Ass'n, Inc. v. Tiger Lines, LLCNo. 93-55452.
Filed September 28, 1995.
S.D. Cal.
AFFIRMED
stating that even after amending claims, when the gravamen of claims asserted is completely preempted by ERISA, a district court still has jurisdiction
Summary of this case from Lodi Mem'l Hosp. Ass'n, Inc. v. Tiger Lines, LLCFull title:Walters v. "A" Co., Inc
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Date published: Sep 28, 1995
Cashmere & Camel Hair Mfrs. Inst. v. Saks Fifth Ave., 284 F.3d 302, 316 (1st Cir. 2002); see also Merck…
Vitamins Online, Inc. v. HeartWise, Inc.Cashmere & Camel Hair Mfrs. Inst. v. Saks Fifth Ave., 284 F.3d 302, 316 (1st Cir. 2002) ("It is well…