From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walquist v. Hodson

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Jun 10, 1933
53 R.I. 322 (R.I. 1933)

Opinion

June 10, 1933.

PRESENT: Stearns, C.J., Rathbun, Sweeney, Murdock, and Hahn, JJ.

( 1) Appeal and Error. Belated Appeal from Decree of Probate Court. Time. A petition to the Supreme Court for leave to file a belated appeal from a decree of a probate court must be filed within one year after the entry of such decree.

( 2) General Supervision of Supreme Court Over Inferior Courts. Cap. 322, Sec. 2, Gen. Laws, 1923, giving the Supreme Court general supervision to correct errors in courts of inferior jurisdiction when no other remedy is expressly provided, does not apply to a petition for leave to file a belated appeal from a decree of a probate court, which petition was filed in the Supreme Court after a year from the entry of the decree in the probate court.

PETITION for leave to file a belated probate appeal. Heard and petition denied and dismissed.

Max Levin, Walter V. Moriarty, Walter V. Connly, George H. Hurley, for petitioner.

McGovern Slattery, Fred B. Perkins, for respondent.


This is a petition for permission to file a belated probate appeal.

Petitioner represents that he has resided in Boston for several years; that his mother resided in Pascoag in the town of Burrillville; that May 9, 1932, he heard that she had died; that he immediately went to Pascoag and found she died there April 26, 1931; that his mother had considerable property; that he consulted his attorney in Boston who learned that the will of the deceased had been admitted to probate by the Probate Court of Burrillville on June 1, 1931; that on June 2, 1932, he consulted a Rhode Island attorney who investigated the facts relating to petitioner's rights with the result that this petition was filed July 9, 1932.

The petition sets forth that the respondents, who are the executor and sole beneficiaries under the will, knew the petitioner lived in Boston and that he was the closest relative of the deceased and that they failed to give him any notice of her decease.

Petitioner avers that the deceased was of unsound mind when she executed her will and that it was procured by the undue influence of the respondents. Two affidavits attached to the petition tend to prove the facts set forth by the petitioner.

Petitioner claims that authority to grant his petition is conferred by § 5108, G.L. 1923, which reads, in part, that when any person is aggrieved by any decree of a probate court, and has failed to claim an appeal, he may petition the Supreme Court, within one year after the entry of such decree, for leave to appeal therefrom. He argues that the year within which his petition to this court must be filed did not commence to run until after the expiration of the forty days allowed by statute to claim an appeal from said decree and that his petition was filed within the year as thus extended.

The argument cannot be supported. The statute provides that a person must claim his appeal within forty days after the entry of the decree and that a petition for leave to claim an appeal from such decree must be filed within one year after its entry. §§ 5400, 5108, G.L. 1923. The decree is entered on the day it is made by the probate court and the time for claiming an appeal therefrom is computed from that date. Dugdale v. Chase, Ex. 52 R.I. 63. A petition for leave to file a belated appeal from such decree must be filed in this court within one year after the entry of such decree. Matteson v. Smith Co., 30 R.I. 424. See also Cohen v. Superior Court, 39 R.I. 272. As the petition was not filed within one year from the date of the entry of the decree in the probate court, this court has no jurisdiction to grant it.

Petitioner also claims jurisdiction is conferred upon this court to grant his petition by that portion of § 4619, G.L. 1923, which states that the Supreme Court shall have general supervision of all courts of inferior jurisdiction to correct and prevent errors and abuses therein when no other remedy is expressly provided. This statute does not apply as nothing has been alleged or shown which entitles petitioner to relief thereunder.

For the reasons given the petition is denied and dismissed.


Summaries of

Walquist v. Hodson

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Jun 10, 1933
53 R.I. 322 (R.I. 1933)
Case details for

Walquist v. Hodson

Case Details

Full title:NELS K. WALQUIST vs. RICHARD J. HODSON, Ex., et al

Court:Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Date published: Jun 10, 1933

Citations

53 R.I. 322 (R.I. 1933)
166 A. 546

Citing Cases

Waz v. Estate of Judge

The lower court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the matter under this motion. See Walquist v. Hodson, 53…

In re Estate of Garan

As an initial matter, it is undisputed that appellant filed her claim of appeal in the probate court within…